我在2015年为我的框架提出了一个解决方案。我把这种类型的承诺称为任务

function createPromise(handler){
  var resolve, reject;

  var promise = new Promise(function(_resolve, _reject){
    resolve = _resolve; 
    reject = _reject;
    if(handler) handler(resolve, reject);
  })
  
  promise.resolve = resolve;
  promise.reject = reject;
  return promise;
}


// create
var promise = createPromise()
promise.then(function(data){ alert(data) })

// resolve from outside
promise.resolve(200)

我正在使用一个辅助函数来创建我所谓的“扁平承诺”-

function flatPromise() {

    let resolve, reject;

    const promise = new Promise((res, rej) => {
      resolve = res;
      reject = rej;
    });

    return { promise, resolve, reject };
}

我是这样用的

function doSomethingAsync() {

    // Get your promise and callbacks
    const { resolve, reject, promise } = flatPromise();

    // Do something amazing...
    setTimeout(() => {
        resolve('done!');
    }, 500);

    // Pass your promise to the world
    return promise;

}

参见完整的工作示例-

function flatPromise() { let resolve, reject; const promise = new Promise((res, rej) => { resolve = res; reject = rej; }); return { promise, resolve, reject }; } function doSomethingAsync() { // Get your promise and callbacks const { resolve, reject, promise } = flatPromise(); // Do something amazing... setTimeout(() => { resolve('done!'); }, 500); // Pass your promise to the world return promise; } (async function run() { const result = await doSomethingAsync() .catch(err => console.error('rejected with', err)); console.log(result); })();

编辑: 我已经创建了一个名为flat-promise的NPM包，代码也可以在GitHub上获得。

我喜欢@JonJaques的回答，但我想更进一步。

如果你绑定并捕获Deferred对象，那么它完全实现了Promise API，你可以将它视为Promise并等待它等等。

⚠️ Editor's Note: I don't recommend this kind of pattern anymore since at the time of writing, Promise.prototype.finally was not a thing yet, then it became a thing… This could happen to other methods so I recommend you augment the promise instance with resolve and reject functions instead: function createDeferredPromise() { let resolve let reject const promise = new Promise((thisResolve, thisReject) => { resolve = thisResolve reject = thisReject }) return Object.assign(promise, {resolve, reject}) } Go upvote someone else's answer.

class DeferredPromise { constructor() { this._promise = new Promise((resolve, reject) => { // assign the resolve and reject functions to `this` // making them usable on the class instance this.resolve = resolve; this.reject = reject; }); // bind `then` and `catch` to implement the same interface as Promise this.then = this._promise.then.bind(this._promise); this.catch = this._promise.catch.bind(this._promise); this.finally = this._promise.finally.bind(this._promise); this[Symbol.toStringTag] = 'Promise'; } } const deferred = new DeferredPromise(); console.log('waiting 2 seconds...'); setTimeout(() => { deferred.resolve('whoa!'); }, 2000); async function someAsyncFunction() { const value = await deferred; console.log(value); } someAsyncFunction();

不，没有其他方法可以做到这一点——我唯一能说的是这个用例不是很常见。就像Felix在评论中说的那样——你所做的将始终有效。

值得一提的是，promise构造函数以这种方式运行的原因是抛出安全——如果当你的代码在promise构造函数中运行时发生了你没有预料到的异常，它将变成拒绝，这种形式的抛出安全——将抛出的错误转换为拒绝是很重要的，有助于维护可预测的代码。

出于这个抛出安全的原因，承诺构造函数被选择而不是延迟(延迟是一种允许你正在做的事情的替代承诺构造方法)——至于最佳实践——我将传递元素并使用承诺构造函数:

var p = new Promise(function(resolve, reject){
    this.onclick = resolve;
}.bind(this));

出于这个原因——只要可以使用promise构造函数而不是导出函数——我建议您使用它。无论何时你可以避免两者，避免两者和链。

注意，你永远不应该在if(condition)这样的情况下使用promise构造函数，第一个例子可以这样写:

var p = Promise[(someCondition)?"resolve":"reject"]();

类版本，在Typescript中:

export class Deferred<T> {
    public readonly promise: Promise<T>
    private resolveFn!: (value: T | PromiseLike<T>) => void
    private rejectFn!: (reason?: any) => void

    public constructor() {
        this.promise = new Promise<T>((resolve, reject) => {
            this.resolveFn = resolve
            this.rejectFn = reject
        })
    }

    public reject(reason?: any): void {
        this.rejectFn(reason)
    }

    public resolve(param: T): void {
        this.resolveFn(param)
    }
}

我为此写了一个小库。https://www.npmjs.com/package/@inf3rno/promise.exposed

我使用了别人写的工厂方法，但是我也重写了then, catch, finally方法，所以你也可以通过这些方法解决原来的承诺。

在没有外部执行人的情况下解决承诺:

const promise = Promise.exposed().then(console.log);
promise.resolve("This should show up in the console.");

从外部与执行器的setTimeout赛跑:

const promise = Promise.exposed(function (resolve, reject){
    setTimeout(function (){
        resolve("I almost fell asleep.")
    }, 100000);
}).then(console.log);

setTimeout(function (){
    promise.resolve("I don't want to wait that much.");
}, 100);

如果你不想污染全局命名空间，有一个无冲突模式:

const createExposedPromise = require("@inf3rno/promise.exposed/noConflict");
const promise = createExposedPromise().then(console.log);
promise.resolve("This should show up in the console.");