除了以上回答中给出的更通用的内存管理技术外，我总是尽可能地减小对象的大小。例如，我处理非常大但非常稀疏的矩阵，换句话说，大多数值为零的矩阵。使用“矩阵”包(大写很重要)，我能够将我的平均对象大小从~2GB减小到~200MB，简单如下:

my.matrix <- Matrix(my.matrix)

Matrix包包含的数据格式可以像常规矩阵一样使用(不需要更改其他代码)，但能够更有效地存储稀疏数据，无论是加载到内存中还是保存到磁盘中。

此外，我收到的原始文件是“长”格式的，其中每个数据点都有变量x, y, z, I。将数据转换为只有变量I的x * y * z维度数组更有效。

了解你的数据并使用一些常识。

我喜欢Dirk的.ls.objects()脚本，但我总是眯着眼睛数大小列中的字符。所以我做了一些丑陋的hack，使它呈现出漂亮的格式大小:

.ls.objects <- function (pos = 1, pattern, order.by,
                        decreasing=FALSE, head=FALSE, n=5) {
    napply <- function(names, fn) sapply(names, function(x)
                                         fn(get(x, pos = pos)))
    names <- ls(pos = pos, pattern = pattern)
    obj.class <- napply(names, function(x) as.character(class(x))[1])
    obj.mode <- napply(names, mode)
    obj.type <- ifelse(is.na(obj.class), obj.mode, obj.class)
    obj.size <- napply(names, object.size)
    obj.prettysize <- sapply(obj.size, function(r) prettyNum(r, big.mark = ",") )
    obj.dim <- t(napply(names, function(x)
                        as.numeric(dim(x))[1:2]))
    vec <- is.na(obj.dim)[, 1] & (obj.type != "function")
    obj.dim[vec, 1] <- napply(names, length)[vec]
    out <- data.frame(obj.type, obj.size,obj.prettysize, obj.dim)
    names(out) <- c("Type", "Size", "PrettySize", "Rows", "Columns")
    if (!missing(order.by))
        out <- out[order(out[[order.by]], decreasing=decreasing), ]
        out <- out[c("Type", "PrettySize", "Rows", "Columns")]
        names(out) <- c("Type", "Size", "Rows", "Columns")
    if (head)
        out <- head(out, n)
    out
}

这并没有增加上面的内容，而是以我喜欢的简单和大量注释的风格编写的。它生成一个对象大小排序表，但没有上面例子中给出的一些细节:

#Find the objects       
MemoryObjects = ls()    
#Create an array
MemoryAssessmentTable=array(NA,dim=c(length(MemoryObjects),2))
#Name the columns
colnames(MemoryAssessmentTable)=c("object","bytes")
#Define the first column as the objects
MemoryAssessmentTable[,1]=MemoryObjects
#Define a function to determine size        
MemoryAssessmentFunction=function(x){object.size(get(x))}
#Apply the function to the objects
MemoryAssessmentTable[,2]=t(t(sapply(MemoryAssessmentTable[,1],MemoryAssessmentFunction)))
#Produce a table with the largest objects first
noquote(MemoryAssessmentTable[rev(order(as.numeric(MemoryAssessmentTable[,2]))),])

Tip for dealing with objects requiring heavy intermediate calculation: When using objects that require a lot of heavy calculation and intermediate steps to create, I often find it useful to write a chunk of code with the function to create the object, and then a separate chunk of code that gives me the option either to generate and save the object as an rmd file, or load it externally from an rmd file I have already previously saved. This is especially easy to do in R Markdown using the following code-chunk structure.

```{r Create OBJECT}

COMPLICATED.FUNCTION <- function(...) { Do heavy calculations needing lots of memory;
                                        Output OBJECT; }

```
```{r Generate or load OBJECT}

LOAD <- TRUE
SAVE <- TRUE
#NOTE: Set LOAD to TRUE if you want to load saved file
#NOTE: Set LOAD to FALSE if you want to generate the object from scratch
#NOTE: Set SAVE to TRUE if you want to save the object externally

if(LOAD) { 
  OBJECT <- readRDS(file = 'MySavedObject.rds') 
} else {
  OBJECT <- COMPLICATED.FUNCTION(x, y, z)
  if (SAVE) { saveRDS(file = 'MySavedObject.rds', object = OBJECT) } }

```

With this code structure, all I need to do is to change LOAD depending on whether I want to generate the object, or load it directly from an existing saved file. (Of course, I have to generate it and save it the first time, but after this I have the option of loading it.) Setting LOAD <- TRUE bypasses use of my complicated function and avoids all of the heavy computation therein. This method still requires enough memory to store the object of interest, but it saves you from having to calculate it each time you run your code. For objects that require a lot of heavy calculation of intermediate steps (e.g., for calculations involving loops over large arrays) this can save a substantial amount of time and computation.

除了以上回答中给出的更通用的内存管理技术外，我总是尽可能地减小对象的大小。例如，我处理非常大但非常稀疏的矩阵，换句话说，大多数值为零的矩阵。使用“矩阵”包(大写很重要)，我能够将我的平均对象大小从~2GB减小到~200MB，简单如下:

my.matrix <- Matrix(my.matrix)

Matrix包包含的数据格式可以像常规矩阵一样使用(不需要更改其他代码)，但能够更有效地存储稀疏数据，无论是加载到内存中还是保存到磁盘中。

此外，我收到的原始文件是“长”格式的，其中每个数据点都有变量x, y, z, I。将数据转换为只有变量I的x * y * z维度数组更有效。

了解你的数据并使用一些常识。

请注意这些数据。table包的tables()似乎是Dirk的.ls.objects()自定义函数的一个很好的替代品(在前面的回答中有详细说明)，尽管只是针对data.frames/tables，而不是矩阵，数组，列表。