除了以上回答中给出的更通用的内存管理技术外，我总是尽可能地减小对象的大小。例如，我处理非常大但非常稀疏的矩阵，换句话说，大多数值为零的矩阵。使用“矩阵”包(大写很重要)，我能够将我的平均对象大小从~2GB减小到~200MB，简单如下:

my.matrix <- Matrix(my.matrix)

Matrix包包含的数据格式可以像常规矩阵一样使用(不需要更改其他代码)，但能够更有效地存储稀疏数据，无论是加载到内存中还是保存到磁盘中。

此外，我收到的原始文件是“长”格式的，其中每个数据点都有变量x, y, z, I。将数据转换为只有变量I的x * y * z维度数组更有效。

了解你的数据并使用一些常识。

我喜欢Dirk的.ls.objects()脚本，但我总是眯着眼睛数大小列中的字符。所以我做了一些丑陋的hack，使它呈现出漂亮的格式大小:

.ls.objects <- function (pos = 1, pattern, order.by,
                        decreasing=FALSE, head=FALSE, n=5) {
    napply <- function(names, fn) sapply(names, function(x)
                                         fn(get(x, pos = pos)))
    names <- ls(pos = pos, pattern = pattern)
    obj.class <- napply(names, function(x) as.character(class(x))[1])
    obj.mode <- napply(names, mode)
    obj.type <- ifelse(is.na(obj.class), obj.mode, obj.class)
    obj.size <- napply(names, object.size)
    obj.prettysize <- sapply(obj.size, function(r) prettyNum(r, big.mark = ",") )
    obj.dim <- t(napply(names, function(x)
                        as.numeric(dim(x))[1:2]))
    vec <- is.na(obj.dim)[, 1] & (obj.type != "function")
    obj.dim[vec, 1] <- napply(names, length)[vec]
    out <- data.frame(obj.type, obj.size,obj.prettysize, obj.dim)
    names(out) <- c("Type", "Size", "PrettySize", "Rows", "Columns")
    if (!missing(order.by))
        out <- out[order(out[[order.by]], decreasing=decreasing), ]
        out <- out[c("Type", "PrettySize", "Rows", "Columns")]
        names(out) <- c("Type", "Size", "Rows", "Columns")
    if (head)
        out <- head(out, n)
    out
}

For both speed and memory purposes, when building a large data frame via some complex series of steps, I'll periodically flush it (the in-progress data set being built) to disk, appending to anything that came before, and then restart it. This way the intermediate steps are only working on smallish data frames (which is good as, e.g., rbind slows down considerably with larger objects). The entire data set can be read back in at the end of the process, when all the intermediate objects have been removed.

dfinal <- NULL
first <- TRUE
tempfile <- "dfinal_temp.csv"
for( i in bigloop ) {
    if( !i %% 10000 ) { 
        print( i, "; flushing to disk..." )
        write.table( dfinal, file=tempfile, append=!first, col.names=first )
        first <- FALSE
        dfinal <- NULL   # nuke it
    }

    # ... complex operations here that add data to 'dfinal' data frame  
}
print( "Loop done; flushing to disk and re-reading entire data set..." )
write.table( dfinal, file=tempfile, append=TRUE, col.names=FALSE )
dfinal <- read.table( tempfile )

Unfortunately I did not have time to test it extensively but here is a memory tip that I have not seen before. For me the required memory was reduced with more than 50%. When you read stuff into R with for example read.csv they require a certain amount of memory. After this you can save them with save("Destinationfile",list=ls()) The next time you open R you can use load("Destinationfile") Now the memory usage might have decreased. It would be nice if anyone could confirm whether this produces similar results with a different dataset.

请注意这些数据。table包的tables()似乎是Dirk的.ls.objects()自定义函数的一个很好的替代品(在前面的回答中有详细说明)，尽管只是针对data.frames/tables，而不是矩阵，数组，列表。

运行

for (i in 1:10) 
    gc(reset = T)

还可以帮助R释放未使用但仍未释放的内存。