二进制信号量和互斥量之间有区别吗?或者它们本质上是相同的?
当前回答
互斥锁只能由获得它的线程释放。 二进制信号量可以由任何线程(或进程)发出信号。
因此,信号量更适合于一些同步问题,如生产者-消费者。
在Windows上,二进制信号量更像事件对象而不是互斥对象。
其他回答
在窗口,差异如下所示。 MUTEX:成功执行等待的进程必须执行一个信号,反之亦然。二进制信号量:不同的进程可以在一个信号量上执行等待或信号操作。
它们的同步语义非常不同:
互斥对象允许对给定资源的序列化访问,即多个线程等待一个锁,一次一个,正如前面所说,线程拥有锁,直到锁完成:只有这个特定的线程可以解锁它。 二进制信号量是一个值为0和1的计数器:任务阻塞在它上,直到任何任务执行sem_post。信号量宣布资源可用,并提供等待机制,直到发出可用信号。
因此,可以将互斥锁视为在任务之间传递的令牌,将信号量视为交通红灯(它向某人发出信号,表示可以继续进行)。
互斥量是任何想要解决临界区问题的算法都必须遵循的标准,而二进制信号量本身是一个可以取0和1值的变量。
互斥锁
Until recently, the only sleeping lock in the kernel was the semaphore. Most users of semaphores instantiated a semaphore with a count of one and treated them as a mutual exclusion lock—a sleeping version of the spin-lock. Unfortunately, semaphores are rather generic and do not impose any usage constraints. This makes them useful for managing exclusive access in obscure situations, such as complicated dances between the kernel and userspace. But it also means that simpler locking is harder to do, and the lack of enforced rules makes any sort of automated debugging or constraint enforcement impossible. Seeking a simpler sleeping lock, the kernel developers introduced the mutex.Yes, as you are now accustomed to, that is a confusing name. Let’s clarify.The term “mutex” is a generic name to refer to any sleeping lock that enforces mutual exclusion, such as a semaphore with a usage count of one. In recent Linux kernels, the proper noun “mutex” is now also a specific type of sleeping lock that implements mutual exclusion.That is, a mutex is a mutex.
互斥锁的简单性和效率来自于它在信号量要求之外强加给用户的附加约束。信号量是按照Dijkstra的原始设计来实现最基本的行为,而互斥锁则不同,它的用例更严格、更窄: n一次只能有一个任务持有互斥锁。也就是说,互斥锁的使用计数总是1。
Whoever locked a mutex must unlock it. That is, you cannot lock a mutex in one context and then unlock it in another. This means that the mutex isn’t suitable for more complicated synchronizations between kernel and user-space. Most use cases, however, cleanly lock and unlock from the same context. Recursive locks and unlocks are not allowed. That is, you cannot recursively acquire the same mutex, and you cannot unlock an unlocked mutex. A process cannot exit while holding a mutex. A mutex cannot be acquired by an interrupt handler or bottom half, even with mutex_trylock(). A mutex can be managed only via the official API: It must be initialized via the methods described in this section and cannot be copied, hand initialized, or reinitialized.
[1] Linux内核开发,第三版Robert Love
以上几乎所有人都说对了。如果有人还有疑问,让我来澄清一下。
互斥->用于序列化 信号- >同步。
两者的目的是不同的,但是,通过精心的编程,可以实现相同的功能。
标准示例->生产者消费者问题。
initial value of SemaVar=0
Producer Consumer
--- SemaWait()->decrement SemaVar
produce data
---
SemaSignal SemaVar or SemaVar++ --->consumer unblocks as SemVar is 1 now.
希望我能澄清。
推荐文章
- Trap和中断的区别是什么?
- 互斥实例/教程?
- 为什么Linux被称为单片内核?
- 如何检查Python的操作系统?
- 在Swift中,什么相当于Objective-C的“@synchronized”?
- 信号量和监视器——有什么不同?
- 如何使用JavaScript找到操作系统的详细信息?
- 我如何检查操作系统与预处理器指令?
- 如何在没有操作系统的情况下运行程序?
- 线程之间共享哪些资源?
- Windows、Mac OS X和Linux是用什么语言编写的?
- 什么时候应该使用自旋锁而不是互斥锁?
- context . start前台服务()没有调用service . start前台()
- 在c#中使用全局互斥锁的好模式是什么?
- 什么是信号量?