在你回答这个问题之前，我从来没有开发过任何流行到足以达到高服务器负载的东西。请把我当作(唉)一个刚刚登陆地球的外星人，尽管我知道PHP和一些优化技术。
我正在开发一个PHP工具，可以获得相当多的用户，如果它是正确的。然而，虽然我完全有能力开发程序，但当涉及到制作可以处理巨大流量的东西时，我几乎一无所知。所以这里有一些关于它的问题(也可以把这个问题变成一个资源线程)。
数据库
At the moment I plan to use the MySQLi features in PHP5. However how should I setup the databases in relation to users and content? Do I actually need multiple databases? At the moment everything's jumbled into one database - although I've been considering spreading user data to one, actual content to another and finally core site content (template masters etc.) to another. My reasoning behind this is that sending queries to different databases will ease up the load on them as one database = 3 load sources. Also would this still be effective if they were all on the same server?
缓存
我有一个用于构建页面和交换变量的模板系统。主模板存储在数据库中，每当一个模板被调用时，它的缓存副本(html文档)就会被调用。目前，我在这些模板中有两种类型的变量-静态变量和动态变量。静态变量通常是像页面名称，网站的名称-不经常改变的东西;动态变量是在每次页面加载时改变的东西。
我的问题是:
比如说我对不同的文章有评论。这是一个更好的解决方案:存储简单的注释模板，并在每次页面加载时呈现注释(来自DB调用)，或者将注释页面的缓存副本存储为html页面——每次添加/编辑/删除注释时，页面都会被重新检索。
最后
有人有任何提示/指针运行一个高负载的PHP网站。我很确定这是一种可行的语言——Facebook和Yahoo!优先考虑——但有什么经验是我应该注意的吗?
首先，正如Knuth所说，“过早的优化是万恶之源”。如果你现在不需要处理这些问题，那就不要去做，先专注于交付一些正确工作的东西。也就是说，如果优化不能等待。
试着分析你的数据库查询，找出什么是慢的，什么是经常发生的，并从中提出一个优化策略。
我会研究Memcached，因为很多高负载站点都使用它来有效地缓存所有类型的内容，而且它的PHP对象接口非常好。
在服务器之间分割数据库并使用某种负载平衡技术(例如，在具有必要数据的冗余数据库中生成1到#之间的随机数—并使用该数字确定要连接到哪个数据库服务器)也是提高效率的一种极好的方法。
在过去，对于一些相当高的负载站点，这些方法都非常有效。希望这能帮助你开始:-)
我在一些网站上工作过，这些网站都是由PHP和MySQL支持的，每个月都有数百万的点击率。以下是一些基本知识:
Cache, cache, cache. Caching is one of the simplest and most effective ways to reduce load on your webserver and database. Cache page content, queries, expensive computation, anything that is I/O bound. Memcache is dead simple and effective.
Use multiple servers once you are maxed out. You can have multiple web servers and multiple database servers (with replication).
Reduce overall # of request to your webservers. This entails caching JS, CSS and images using expires headers. You can also move your static content to a CDN, which will speed up your user's experience.
Measure & benchmark. Run Nagios on your production machines and load test on your dev/qa server. You need to know when your server will catch on fire so you can prevent it.
我推荐阅读《构建可扩展的网站》，它是由Flickr的一位工程师写的，是一个很好的参考。
看看我关于可伸缩性的博客文章，它有很多关于多种语言和平台可伸缩性的演示文稿的链接:
http://www.ryandoherty.net/2008/07/13/unicorns-and-scalability/
看来我错了。MySQLi仍在开发中。但是根据这篇文章，PDO_MySQL现在由MySQL团队贡献。摘自文章:
The MySQL Improved Extension - mysqli
- is the flagship. It supports all features of the MySQL Server including
Charsets, Prepared Statements and
Stored Procedures. The driver offers a
hybrid API: you can use a procedural
or object-oriented programming style
based on your preference. mysqli comes
with PHP 5 and up. Note that the End
of life for PHP 4 is 2008-08-08.
The PHP Data Objects (PDO) are a
database access abstraction layer. PDO
allows you to use the same API calls
for various databases. PDO does not
offer any degree of SQL abstraction.
PDO_MYSQL is a MySQL driver for PDO.
PDO_MYSQL comes with PHP 5. As of PHP
5.3 MySQL developers actively contribute to it. The PDO benefit of a
unified API comes at the price that
MySQL specific features, for example
multiple statements, are not fully
supported through the unified API.
Please stop using the first MySQL
driver for PHP ever published:
ext/mysql. Since the introduction of
the MySQL Improved Extension - mysqli
- in 2004 with PHP 5 there is no reason to still use the oldest driver
around. ext/mysql does not support
Charsets, Prepared Statements and
Stored Procedures. It is limited to
the feature set of MySQL 4.0. Note
that the Extended Support for MySQL
4.0 ends at 2008-12-31. Don't limit yourself to the feature set of such
old software! Upgrade to mysqli, see
also Converting_to_MySQLi. mysql is in
maintenance only mode from our point
of view.
对我来说，这篇文章似乎偏向MySQLi。我想我偏向于PDO。
我真的很喜欢PDO胜过MySQLi。这对我来说很简单。这个API更接近于我编写的其他语言。OO数据库接口似乎工作得更好。
我还没有遇到过任何PDO无法提供的MySQL特性。如果有的话，我才会惊讶呢。
