对，所以我有一个可枚举的，希望从中得到不同的值。
使用System.Linq，当然有一个名为Distinct的扩展方法。在简单的情况下，它可以不带参数使用，例如：
var distinctValues = myStringList.Distinct();
很好，但如果我有一个可枚举的对象，需要为其指定相等，唯一可用的重载是：
var distinctValues = myCustomerList.Distinct(someEqualityComparer);
相等比较器参数必须是IEqualityComparer＜T＞的实例。当然，我可以做到这一点，但这有点冗长，而且，嗯，包含了很多内容。
我所期望的是一个重载，它会接受lambda，比如Func<T，T，bool>：
var distinctValues = myCustomerList.Distinct((c1, c2) => c1.CustomerId == c2.CustomerId);
有人知道是否存在这样的扩展，或者是否存在等效的解决方法？还是我错过了什么？
或者，有没有一种方法可以内联指定IEqualityComparer（让我尴尬）？
使现代化
我在MSDN论坛上找到了Anders Hejlsberg对此主题的回复。他说：
您将遇到的问题是，当两个对象进行比较时相等，它们必须具有相同的GetHashCode返回值（或Distinct内部使用的哈希表将无法正常工作）。我们使用IEqualityComparer，因为它包兼容Equals和GetHashCode的实现集成到单个接口中。
我想这是有道理的。
IEnumerable lambda扩展名：
public static class ListExtensions
{
public static IEnumerable<T> Distinct<T>(this IEnumerable<T> list, Func<T, int> hashCode)
{
Dictionary<int, T> hashCodeDic = new Dictionary<int, T>();
list.ToList().ForEach(t =>
{
var key = hashCode(t);
if (!hashCodeDic.ContainsKey(key))
hashCodeDic.Add(key, t);
});
return hashCodeDic.Select(kvp => kvp.Value);
}
}
用法：
class Employee
{
public string Name { get; set; }
public int EmployeeID { get; set; }
}
//Add 5 employees to List
List<Employee> lst = new List<Employee>();
Employee e = new Employee { Name = "Shantanu", EmployeeID = 123456 };
lst.Add(e);
lst.Add(e);
Employee e1 = new Employee { Name = "Adam Warren", EmployeeID = 823456 };
lst.Add(e1);
//Add a space in the Name
Employee e2 = new Employee { Name = "Adam Warren", EmployeeID = 823456 };
lst.Add(e2);
//Name is different case
Employee e3 = new Employee { Name = "adam warren", EmployeeID = 823456 };
lst.Add(e3);
//Distinct (without IEqalityComparer<T>) - Returns 4 employees
var lstDistinct1 = lst.Distinct();
//Lambda Extension - Return 2 employees
var lstDistinct = lst.Distinct(employee => employee.EmployeeID.GetHashCode() ^ employee.Name.ToUpper().Replace(" ", "").GetHashCode());
在我看来，你想从MoreLINQ得到DistinctBy。然后你可以写：
var distinctValues = myCustomerList.DistinctBy(c => c.CustomerId);
这里是DistinctBy的简化版本（没有无效性检查，也没有指定自己的密钥比较器的选项）：
public static IEnumerable<TSource> DistinctBy<TSource, TKey>
(this IEnumerable<TSource> source, Func<TSource, TKey> keySelector)
{
HashSet<TKey> knownKeys = new HashSet<TKey>();
foreach (TSource element in source)
{
if (knownKeys.Add(keySelector(element)))
{
yield return element;
}
}
}
我用过的东西对我很有用。
/// <summary>
/// A class to wrap the IEqualityComparer interface into matching functions for simple implementation
/// </summary>
/// <typeparam name="T">The type of object to be compared</typeparam>
public class MyIEqualityComparer<T> : IEqualityComparer<T>
{
/// <summary>
/// Create a new comparer based on the given Equals and GetHashCode methods
/// </summary>
/// <param name="equals">The method to compute equals of two T instances</param>
/// <param name="getHashCode">The method to compute a hashcode for a T instance</param>
public MyIEqualityComparer(Func<T, T, bool> equals, Func<T, int> getHashCode)
{
if (equals == null)
throw new ArgumentNullException("equals", "Equals parameter is required for all MyIEqualityComparer instances");
EqualsMethod = equals;
GetHashCodeMethod = getHashCode;
}
/// <summary>
/// Gets the method used to compute equals
/// </summary>
public Func<T, T, bool> EqualsMethod { get; private set; }
/// <summary>
/// Gets the method used to compute a hash code
/// </summary>
public Func<T, int> GetHashCodeMethod { get; private set; }
bool IEqualityComparer<T>.Equals(T x, T y)
{
return EqualsMethod(x, y);
}
int IEqualityComparer<T>.GetHashCode(T obj)
{
if (GetHashCodeMethod == null)
return obj.GetHashCode();
return GetHashCodeMethod(obj);
}
}
