虽然这是一个老问题，但让我也谈谈我的看法。

abstract class: Inside abstract class we can declare instance variables, which are required to the child class Interface: Inside interface every variables is always public static and final we cannot declare instance variables abstract class: Abstract class can talk about state of object Interface: Interface can never talk about state of object abstract class: Inside Abstract class we can declare constructors Interface: Inside interface we cannot declare constructors as purpose of constructors is to initialize instance variables. So what is the need of constructor there if we cannot have instance variables in interfaces. abstract class: Inside abstract class we can declare instance and static blocks Interface: Interfaces cannot have instance and static blocks. abstract class: Abstract class cannot refer lambda expression Interfaces: Interfaces with single abstract method can refer lambda expression abstract class: Inside abstract class we can override OBJECT CLASS methods Interfaces: We cannot override OBJECT CLASS methods inside interfaces.

最后，我要指出:

Default method concepts/static method concepts in interface came just to save implementation classes but not to provide meaningful useful implementation. Default methods/static methods are kind of dummy implementation, "if you want you can use them or you can override them (in case of default methods) in implementation class" Thus saving us from implementing new methods in implementation classes whenever new methods in interfaces are added. Therefore interfaces can never be equal to abstract classes.

本文将对此进行描述。想想forEach of Collections。

List<?> list = …
list.forEach(…);

The forEach isn’t declared by java.util.List nor the java.util.Collection interface yet. One obvious solution would be to just add the new method to the existing interface and provide the implementation where required in the JDK. However, once published, it is impossible to add methods to an interface without breaking the existing implementation. The benefit that default methods bring is that now it’s possible to add a new default method to the interface and it doesn’t break the implementations.

这两个是完全不同的:

默认方法是在不改变现有类状态的情况下向其添加外部功能。

抽象类是一种普通的继承类型，它们是用于扩展的普通类。

抽象类比默认方法实现(如私有状态)要多得多，但从Java 8开始，无论何时您可以选择其中任何一种，都应该选择防御器(也就是私有状态)。默认)方法。

默认方法的限制是它只能通过调用其他接口方法来实现，而不能引用特定实现的状态。所以主要的用例是高级和方便的方法。

这个新特性的好处在于，以前您必须使用抽象类来实现方便的方法，从而将实现者限制为单一继承，现在您可以拥有一个真正干净的设计，只需要接口，并且强制程序员进行最少的实现工作。

向Java 8引入默认方法的最初动机是希望在不破坏任何现有实现的情况下，使用面向lambda的方法扩展集合框架接口。虽然这与公共图书馆的作者更相关，但您可能会发现相同的特性在您的项目中也很有用。您有一个集中的地方可以添加新的便利，而不必依赖于类型层次结构的其余部分。

什么时候应该使用缺省方法的接口，什么时候应该使用 抽象类被使用?

向后兼容性: 想象一下，你的接口是由数百个类实现的，修改这个接口将迫使所有用户实现新添加的方法，即使它对于实现你的接口的许多其他类来说可能不是必需的。另外，它允许你的接口成为一个功能接口

事实与限制:

1-只能在接口中声明，而不能在类或 抽象类。

2 .必须提供一个主体

它不像接口中使用的其他常规方法那样被认为是抽象的。

虽然这是一个老问题，但让我也谈谈我的看法。

abstract class: Inside abstract class we can declare instance variables, which are required to the child class Interface: Inside interface every variables is always public static and final we cannot declare instance variables abstract class: Abstract class can talk about state of object Interface: Interface can never talk about state of object abstract class: Inside Abstract class we can declare constructors Interface: Inside interface we cannot declare constructors as purpose of constructors is to initialize instance variables. So what is the need of constructor there if we cannot have instance variables in interfaces. abstract class: Inside abstract class we can declare instance and static blocks Interface: Interfaces cannot have instance and static blocks. abstract class: Abstract class cannot refer lambda expression Interfaces: Interfaces with single abstract method can refer lambda expression abstract class: Inside abstract class we can override OBJECT CLASS methods Interfaces: We cannot override OBJECT CLASS methods inside interfaces.

最后，我要指出:

Default method concepts/static method concepts in interface came just to save implementation classes but not to provide meaningful useful implementation. Default methods/static methods are kind of dummy implementation, "if you want you can use them or you can override them (in case of default methods) in implementation class" Thus saving us from implementing new methods in implementation classes whenever new methods in interfaces are added. Therefore interfaces can never be equal to abstract classes.