或者一气呵成:

  var obj:any = {}
  obj.prop = 5;

我倾向于把任何放在另一边，即var foo:IFoo = <任何>{};所以这样的东西仍然是类型安全的:

interface IFoo{
    bar:string;
    baz:string;
    boo:string;     
}

// How I tend to intialize 
var foo:IFoo = <any>{};

foo.bar = "asdf";
foo.baz = "boo";
foo.boo = "boo";

// the following is an error, 
// so you haven't lost type safety
foo.bar = 123; 

或者你可以将这些属性标记为可选:

interface IFoo{
    bar?:string;
    baz?:string;
    boo?:string;    
}

// Now your simple initialization works
var foo:IFoo = {};

在网上试试

为了保证类型是Object(即键值对)，使用:

const obj: {[x: string]: any} = {}
obj.prop = 'cool beans'

既然你不能这样做:

obj.prop = 'value';

如果你的TS编译器和linter没有严格要求你，你可以这样写:

obj['prop'] = 'value';

如果你的TS编译器或linter是严格的，另一个答案将是类型转换:

var obj = {};
obj = obj as unknown as { prop: string };
obj.prop = "value";

晚不过，简单回答

let prop = 'name';
let value = 'sampath';
this.obj = {
   ...this.obj,
   [prop]: value
};

我很惊讶没有一个答案引用Object。赋值，因为这是我在考虑JavaScript中的“组合”时使用的技术。

在TypeScript中，它可以像预期的那样工作:

interface IExisting {
    userName: string
}

interface INewStuff {
    email: string
}

const existingObject: IExisting = {
    userName: "jsmith"
}

const objectWithAllProps: IExisting & INewStuff = Object.assign({}, existingObject, {
    email: "jsmith@someplace.com"
})

console.log(objectWithAllProps.email); // jsmith@someplace.com

优势

始终保持类型安全，因为您根本不需要使用任何类型 使用TypeScript的聚合类型(在声明objectWithAllProps类型时用&表示)，这清楚地表明我们正在动态地(即动态地)组合一个新类型。

需要注意的事情

Object.assign has it's own unique aspects (that are well known to most experienced JS devs) that should be considered when writing TypeScript. It can be used in a mutable fashion, or an immutable manner (I demonstrate the immutable way above, which means that existingObject stays untouched and therefore doesn't have an email property. For most functional-style programmers, that's a good thing since the result is the only new change). Object.assign works the best when you have flatter objects. If you are combining two nested objects that contain nullable properties, you can end up overwriting truthy values with undefined. If you watch out for the order of the Object.assign arguments, you should be fine.