我也遇到了同样的问题，我想出了一个不使用ProgressDialog的解决方案，我得到了更快的结果。

我所做的是创建一个布局，其中有一个ProgressBar。

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<RelativeLayout
xmlns:android="http://schemas.android.com/apk/res/android"
android:layout_width="fill_parent"
android:layout_height="fill_parent">
<ProgressBar
    android:id="@+id/progressImage"
    android:layout_width="wrap_content"
    android:layout_height="wrap_content"
    android:layout_centerInParent="true"
    />
</RelativeLayout>

然后在onCreate方法中执行以下操作

public void onCreate(Bundle icicle) {
    super.onCreate(icicle);
    setContentView(R.layout.progress);
}

然后在线程中执行长任务，完成后使用Runnable将内容视图设置为您想要用于此活动的实际布局。

例如:

mHandler.post(new Runnable(){

public void run() {
        setContentView(R.layout.my_layout);
    } 
});

这就是我所做的，我发现它比显示ProgressDialog运行得更快，在我看来，它的侵入性更小，外观更好。

然而，如果你想要使用ProgressDialog，那么这个答案不适合你。

最初的问题是代码无法在屏幕方向改变时存活下来。显然，这是“解决”的程序处理屏幕方向变化本身，而不是让UI框架做它(通过调用onDestroy)。

I would submit that if the underlying problem is that the program will not survive onDestroy(), then the accepted solution is just a workaround that leaves the program with serious other problems and vulnerabilities. Remember that the Android framework specifically states that your activity is at risk for being destroyed almost at any time due to circumstances outside your control. Therefore, your activity must be able to survive onDestroy() and subsequent onCreate() for any reason, not just a screen orientation change.

如果你要接受自己处理屏幕方向变化来解决OP的问题，你需要验证onDestroy()的其他原因不会导致相同的错误。你能做到吗?如果不是，我会质疑这个“公认的”答案是否真的是一个很好的答案。

最简单和最灵活的解决方案是使用带有ProgressBar静态引用的AsyncTask。这为方向更改问题提供了一个封装的、因此可重用的解决方案。这个解决方案很好地帮助我完成了各种异步任务，包括互联网下载、与服务通信和文件系统扫描。该解决方案已经在多个安卓版本和手机型号上进行了良好的测试。完整的演示可以在DownloadFile.java中找到

下面是一个概念示例

public class SimpleAsync extends AsyncTask<String, Integer, String> {
    private static ProgressDialog mProgressDialog = null;
    private final Context mContext;

    public SimpleAsync(Context context) {
        mContext = context;
        if ( mProgressDialog != null ) {
            onPreExecute();
        }
    }

    @Override
    protected void onPreExecute() {
        mProgressDialog = new ProgressDialog( mContext );
        mProgressDialog.show();
    }

    @Override
    protected void onPostExecute(String result) {
        if ( mProgressDialog != null ) {
            mProgressDialog.dismiss();
            mProgressDialog = null;
        }
    }

    @Override
    protected void onProgressUpdate(Integer... progress) {
        mProgressDialog.setProgress( progress[0] );
    }

    @Override
    protected String doInBackground(String... sUrl) {
        // Do some work here
        publishProgress(1);
        return null;
    }

    public void dismiss() {
        if ( mProgressDialog != null ) {
            mProgressDialog.dismiss();
        }
    }
}

在Android Activity中的使用很简单

public class MainActivity extends Activity {
    DemoServiceClient mClient = null;
    DownloadFile mDownloadFile = null;

    @Override
    public void onCreate(Bundle savedInstanceState) {
        super.onCreate( savedInstanceState );
        setContentView( R.layout.main );
        mDownloadFile = new DownloadFile( this );

        Button downloadButton = (Button) findViewById( R.id.download_file_button );
        downloadButton.setOnClickListener( new View.OnClickListener() {
            @Override
            public void onClick(View view) {
                mDownloadFile.execute( "http://www.textfiles.com/food/bakebred.txt");
            }
        });
    }

    @Override
    public void onPause() {
        super.onPause();
        mDownloadFile.dismiss();
    }
}

我发现了一个更容易的解决方案来处理线程时，方向改变。你可以只保留一个静态引用到你的活动/片段，并在对ui进行操作之前验证它是否为空。我建议使用try catch:

 public class DashListFragment extends Fragment {
     private static DashListFragment ACTIVE_INSTANCE;

     @Override
     public void onCreate(Bundle savedInstanceState) {
        super.onCreate(savedInstanceState);

        ACTIVE_INSTANCE = this;

        new Handler().postDelayed(new Runnable() {
            public void run() {
                try {
                        if (ACTIVE_INSTANCE != null) {
                            setAdapter(); // this method do something on ui or use context
                        }
                }
                catch (Exception e) {}


            }
        }, 1500l);

    }

    @Override
    public void onDestroy() {
        super.onDestroy();

        ACTIVE_INSTANCE = null;
    }


}

这是我提出的解决方案:

Move the AsyncTask or Thread to a retained Fragment, as explained here. I believe it is a good practice to move all network calls to fragments. If you are already using fragments, one of them could be made responsible for the calls. Otherwise, you can create a fragment just for doing the request, as the linked article proposes. The fragment will use a listener interface to signal the task completion/failure. You don't have to worry for orientation changes there. The fragment will always have the correct link to the current activity and progress dialog can be safely resumed. Make your progress dialog a member of your class. In fact you should do that for all dialogs. In the onPause method you should dismiss them, otherwise you will leak a window on the configuration change. The busy state should be kept by the fragment. When the fragment is attached to the activity, you can bring up the progress dialog again, if the call is still running. A void showProgressDialog() method can be added to the fragment-activity listener interface for this purpose.

将长任务移动到单独的类中。将其实现为主题-观察者模式。每当创建活动时，注册并在关闭时注销任务类。任务类可以使用AsyncTask。