我认为使用async，可以有一个更优雅的解决方案，即使同时使用standardOutput和standardError也不会出现死锁:

using (Process process = new Process())
{
    process.StartInfo.FileName = filename;
    process.StartInfo.Arguments = arguments;
    process.StartInfo.UseShellExecute = false;
    process.StartInfo.RedirectStandardOutput = true;
    process.StartInfo.RedirectStandardError = true;

    process.Start();

    var tStandardOutput = process.StandardOutput.ReadToEndAsync();
    var tStandardError = process.StandardError.ReadToEndAsync();

    if (process.WaitForExit(timeout))
    {
        string output = await tStandardOutput;
        string errors = await tStandardError;

        // Process completed. Check process.ExitCode here.
    }
    else
    {
        // Timed out.
    }
}

这是基于Mark Byers的回答。 如果你不在异步方法中，你可以使用string output = tStandardOutput.result;而不是等待

我读了很多答案，并给出了自己的答案。不确定这个在任何情况下都会修复，但它在我的环境中修复了。我没有使用WaitForExit，而是使用WaitHandle。在输出和错误端信号上等待所有。如果有人能发现可能存在的问题，我会很高兴。或者它是否能帮助别人。对我来说更好，因为不用暂停。

private static int DoProcess(string workingDir, string fileName, string arguments)
{
    int exitCode;
    using (var process = new Process
    {
        StartInfo =
        {
            WorkingDirectory = workingDir,
            WindowStyle = ProcessWindowStyle.Hidden,
            CreateNoWindow = true,
            UseShellExecute = false,
            FileName = fileName,
            Arguments = arguments,
            RedirectStandardError = true,
            RedirectStandardOutput = true
        },
        EnableRaisingEvents = true
    })
    {
        using (var outputWaitHandle = new AutoResetEvent(false))
        using (var errorWaitHandle = new AutoResetEvent(false))
        {
            process.OutputDataReceived += (sender, args) =>
            {
                // ReSharper disable once AccessToDisposedClosure
                if (args.Data != null) Debug.Log(args.Data);
                else outputWaitHandle.Set();
            };
            process.ErrorDataReceived += (sender, args) =>
            {
                // ReSharper disable once AccessToDisposedClosure
                if (args.Data != null) Debug.LogError(args.Data);
                else errorWaitHandle.Set();
            };

            process.Start();
            process.BeginOutputReadLine();
            process.BeginErrorReadLine();

            WaitHandle.WaitAll(new WaitHandle[] { outputWaitHandle, errorWaitHandle });

            exitCode = process.ExitCode;
        }
    }
    return exitCode;
}

在阅读了这里所有的帖子之后，我确定了Marko avlijaovic的统一解决方案。 然而，它并没有解决我所有的问题。

在我们的环境中，我们有一个Windows服务，计划运行数百个不同的.bat .cmd .exe，…等等，这些文件积累了多年，由许多不同的人以不同的风格编写。我们无法控制程序和脚本的编写，我们只负责调度、运行和成功/失败的报告。

所以我尝试了这里所有的建议，并取得了不同程度的成功。Marko的回答几乎是完美的，但是当作为服务运行时，它并不总是捕获标准输出。我一直没搞清楚为什么不行。

我们发现在所有情况下都有效的唯一解决方案是:http://csharptest.net/319/using-the-processrunner-class/index.html

我试图通过考虑Mark Byers, Rob, stevejay的回答，创建一个类来解决你使用异步流读取的问题。这样做，我意识到有一个与异步流程输出流读取相关的错误。

我在微软报告了这个漏洞:https://connect.microsoft.com/VisualStudio/feedback/details/3119134

简介:

You can't do that: process.BeginOutputReadLine(); process.Start(); You will receive System.InvalidOperationException : StandardOut has not been redirected or the process hasn't started yet. ============================================================================================================================ Then you have to start asynchronous output read after the process is started: process.Start(); process.BeginOutputReadLine(); Doing so, make a race condition because the output stream can receive data before you set it to asynchronous:

process.Start(); 
// Here the operating system could give the cpu to another thread.  
// For example, the newly created thread (Process) and it could start writing to the output
// immediately before next line would execute. 
// That create a race condition.
process.BeginOutputReadLine();

============================================================================================================================ Then some people could say that you just have to read the stream before you set it to asynchronous. But the same problem occurs. There will be a race condition between the synchronous read and set the stream into asynchronous mode. ============================================================================================================================ There is no way to acheive safe asynchronous read of an output stream of a process in the actual way "Process" and "ProcessStartInfo" has been designed.

对于您的情况，您最好使用其他用户建议的异步读取。但是您应该意识到，由于竞态条件，您可能会错过一些信息。

https://stackoverflow.com/a/17600012/4151626的信用归于EM0

我的应用程序的其他解决方案(包括EM0)仍然处于死锁状态，这是由于内部超时以及派生应用程序同时使用StandardOutput和standderror。以下是对我有效的方法:

Process p = new Process()
{
  StartInfo = new ProcessStartInfo()
  {
    FileName = exe,
    Arguments = args,
    UseShellExecute = false,
    RedirectStandardOutput = true,
    RedirectStandardError = true
  }
};
p.Start();

string cv_error = null;
Thread et = new Thread(() => { cv_error = p.StandardError.ReadToEnd(); });
et.Start();

string cv_out = null;
Thread ot = new Thread(() => { cv_out = p.StandardOutput.ReadToEnd(); });
ot.Start();

p.WaitForExit();
ot.Join();
et.Join();

编辑:添加初始化StartInfo代码示例

我认为使用async，可以有一个更优雅的解决方案，即使同时使用standardOutput和standardError也不会出现死锁:

using (Process process = new Process())
{
    process.StartInfo.FileName = filename;
    process.StartInfo.Arguments = arguments;
    process.StartInfo.UseShellExecute = false;
    process.StartInfo.RedirectStandardOutput = true;
    process.StartInfo.RedirectStandardError = true;

    process.Start();

    var tStandardOutput = process.StandardOutput.ReadToEndAsync();
    var tStandardError = process.StandardError.ReadToEndAsync();

    if (process.WaitForExit(timeout))
    {
        string output = await tStandardOutput;
        string errors = await tStandardError;

        // Process completed. Check process.ExitCode here.
    }
    else
    {
        // Timed out.
    }
}

这是基于Mark Byers的回答。 如果你不在异步方法中，你可以使用string output = tStandardOutput.result;而不是等待