我有以下代码:
info = new System.Diagnostics.ProcessStartInfo("TheProgram.exe", String.Join(" ", args));
info.CreateNoWindow = true;
info.WindowStyle = System.Diagnostics.ProcessWindowStyle.Hidden;
info.RedirectStandardOutput = true;
info.UseShellExecute = false;
System.Diagnostics.Process p = System.Diagnostics.Process.Start(info);
p.WaitForExit();
Console.WriteLine(p.StandardOutput.ReadToEnd()); //need the StandardOutput contents
我知道我正在启动的进程的输出大约有7MB长。在Windows控制台中运行它可以正常工作。不幸的是,从编程的角度来看,它会无限期地挂在WaitForExit上。还要注意,对于较小的输出(比如3KB),这段代码不会挂起。
ProcessStartInfo中的内部StandardOutput是否可能不能缓冲7MB?如果是,我该怎么办?如果不是,我做错了什么?
上面的答案没有一个能起作用。
Rob解决方案挂起,“Mark Byers”解决方案获得已处理异常。(我尝试了其他答案的“解决方案”)。
所以我决定提出另一个解决方案:
public void GetProcessOutputWithTimeout(Process process, int timeoutSec, CancellationToken token, out string output, out int exitCode)
{
string outputLocal = ""; int localExitCode = -1;
var task = System.Threading.Tasks.Task.Factory.StartNew(() =>
{
outputLocal = process.StandardOutput.ReadToEnd();
process.WaitForExit();
localExitCode = process.ExitCode;
}, token);
if (task.Wait(timeoutSec, token))
{
output = outputLocal;
exitCode = localExitCode;
}
else
{
exitCode = -1;
output = "";
}
}
using (var process = new Process())
{
process.StartInfo = ...;
process.Start();
string outputUnicode; int exitCode;
GetProcessOutputWithTimeout(process, PROCESS_TIMEOUT, out outputUnicode, out exitCode);
}
这段代码经过调试,工作完美。
我也有同样的问题,但原因不同。但是在Windows 8下会发生,而在Windows 7下不会。下面这行似乎是导致这个问题的原因。
pProcess.StartInfo.UseShellExecute = False
解决方案是不禁用UseShellExecute。我现在收到一个Shell弹出窗口,这是不需要的,但比程序等待什么特别的事情发生要好得多。所以我添加了如下的解决方法:
pProcess.StartInfo.WindowStyle = ProcessWindowStyle.Hidden
现在唯一让我困扰的是为什么在Windows 8下会出现这种情况。
https://stackoverflow.com/a/17600012/4151626的信用归于EM0
我的应用程序的其他解决方案(包括EM0)仍然处于死锁状态,这是由于内部超时以及派生应用程序同时使用StandardOutput和standderror。以下是对我有效的方法:
Process p = new Process()
{
StartInfo = new ProcessStartInfo()
{
FileName = exe,
Arguments = args,
UseShellExecute = false,
RedirectStandardOutput = true,
RedirectStandardError = true
}
};
p.Start();
string cv_error = null;
Thread et = new Thread(() => { cv_error = p.StandardError.ReadToEnd(); });
et.Start();
string cv_out = null;
Thread ot = new Thread(() => { cv_out = p.StandardOutput.ReadToEnd(); });
ot.Start();
p.WaitForExit();
ot.Join();
et.Join();
编辑:添加初始化StartInfo代码示例
我最终使用的解决方案来避免所有的复杂性:
var outputFile = Path.GetTempFileName();
info = new System.Diagnostics.ProcessStartInfo("TheProgram.exe", String.Join(" ", args) + " > " + outputFile + " 2>&1");
info.CreateNoWindow = true;
info.WindowStyle = System.Diagnostics.ProcessWindowStyle.Hidden;
info.UseShellExecute = false;
System.Diagnostics.Process p = System.Diagnostics.Process.Start(info);
p.WaitForExit();
Console.WriteLine(File.ReadAllText(outputFile)); //need the StandardOutput contents
所以我创建了一个临时文件,通过使用> outputfile > 2>&1将输出和错误重定向到它,然后在进程完成后读取文件。
其他解决方案适用于希望对输出执行其他操作的场景,但对于简单的操作,这可以避免很多复杂性。
我试图通过考虑Mark Byers, Rob, stevejay的回答,创建一个类来解决你使用异步流读取的问题。这样做,我意识到有一个与异步流程输出流读取相关的错误。
我在微软报告了这个漏洞:https://connect.microsoft.com/VisualStudio/feedback/details/3119134
简介:
You can't do that:
process.BeginOutputReadLine(); process.Start();
You will receive System.InvalidOperationException : StandardOut has
not been redirected or the process hasn't started yet.
============================================================================================================================
Then you have to start asynchronous output read after the process is
started:
process.Start(); process.BeginOutputReadLine();
Doing so, make a race condition because the output stream can receive
data before you set it to asynchronous:
process.Start();
// Here the operating system could give the cpu to another thread.
// For example, the newly created thread (Process) and it could start writing to the output
// immediately before next line would execute.
// That create a race condition.
process.BeginOutputReadLine();
============================================================================================================================
Then some people could say that you just have to read the stream
before you set it to asynchronous. But the same problem occurs. There
will be a race condition between the synchronous read and set the
stream into asynchronous mode.
============================================================================================================================
There is no way to acheive safe asynchronous read of an output stream
of a process in the actual way "Process" and "ProcessStartInfo" has
been designed.
对于您的情况,您最好使用其他用户建议的异步读取。但是您应该意识到,由于竞态条件,您可能会错过一些信息。
我读了很多答案,并给出了自己的答案。不确定这个在任何情况下都会修复,但它在我的环境中修复了。我没有使用WaitForExit,而是使用WaitHandle。在输出和错误端信号上等待所有。如果有人能发现可能存在的问题,我会很高兴。或者它是否能帮助别人。对我来说更好,因为不用暂停。
private static int DoProcess(string workingDir, string fileName, string arguments)
{
int exitCode;
using (var process = new Process
{
StartInfo =
{
WorkingDirectory = workingDir,
WindowStyle = ProcessWindowStyle.Hidden,
CreateNoWindow = true,
UseShellExecute = false,
FileName = fileName,
Arguments = arguments,
RedirectStandardError = true,
RedirectStandardOutput = true
},
EnableRaisingEvents = true
})
{
using (var outputWaitHandle = new AutoResetEvent(false))
using (var errorWaitHandle = new AutoResetEvent(false))
{
process.OutputDataReceived += (sender, args) =>
{
// ReSharper disable once AccessToDisposedClosure
if (args.Data != null) Debug.Log(args.Data);
else outputWaitHandle.Set();
};
process.ErrorDataReceived += (sender, args) =>
{
// ReSharper disable once AccessToDisposedClosure
if (args.Data != null) Debug.LogError(args.Data);
else errorWaitHandle.Set();
};
process.Start();
process.BeginOutputReadLine();
process.BeginErrorReadLine();
WaitHandle.WaitAll(new WaitHandle[] { outputWaitHandle, errorWaitHandle });
exitCode = process.ExitCode;
}
}
return exitCode;
}