var str = "123456789";
var chunks = [];
var chunkSize = 2;

while (str) {
    if (str.length < chunkSize) {
        chunks.push(str);
        break;
    }
    else {
        chunks.push(str.substr(0, chunkSize));
        str = str.substr(chunkSize);
    }
}

alert(chunks); // chunks == 12,34,56,78,9

var l = str.length, lc = 0, chunks = [], c = 0, chunkSize = 2;
for (; lc < l; c++) {
  chunks[c] = str.slice(lc, lc += chunkSize);
}

    window.format = function(b, a) {
        if (!b || isNaN(+a)) return a;
        var a = b.charAt(0) == "-" ? -a : +a,
            j = a < 0 ? a = -a : 0,
            e = b.match(/[^\d\-\+#]/g),
            h = e && e[e.length - 1] || ".",
            e = e && e[1] && e[0] || ",",
            b = b.split(h),
            a = a.toFixed(b[1] && b[1].length),
            a = +a + "",
            d = b[1] && b[1].lastIndexOf("0"),
            c = a.split(".");
        if (!c[1] || c[1] && c[1].length <= d) a = (+a).toFixed(d + 1);
        d = b[0].split(e);
        b[0] = d.join("");
        var f = b[0] && b[0].indexOf("0");
        if (f > -1)
            for (; c[0].length < b[0].length - f;) c[0] = "0" + c[0];
        else +c[0] == 0 && (c[0] = "");
        a = a.split(".");
        a[0] = c[0];
        if (c = d[1] && d[d.length -
                1].length) {
            for (var d = a[0], f = "", k = d.length % c, g = 0, i = d.length; g < i; g++) f += d.charAt(g), !((g - k + 1) % c) && g < i - c && (f += e);
            a[0] = f
        }
        a[1] = b[1] && a[1] ? h + a[1] : "";
        return (j ? "-" : "") + a[0] + a[1]
    };

var str="1234567890";
var formatstr=format( "##,###.", str);
alert(formatstr);


This will split the string in reverse order with comma separated after 3 char's. If you want you can change the position.

那么下面这一小段代码呢:

function splitME(str, size) {
    let subStr = new RegExp('.{1,' + size + '}', 'g');
    return str.match(subStr);
};

function chunkString(str, length = 10) {
    let result = [],
        offset = 0;
    if (str.length <= length) return result.push(str) && result;
    while (offset < str.length) {
        result.push(str.substr(offset, length));
        offset += length;
    }
    return result;
}

比较match, slice, substr和substring 不同块大小的匹配和切片的比较 小块大小的匹配和切片的比较

底线:

match非常低效，slice更好，在Firefox上substr/substring更好 匹配对于短字符串来说效率更低(即使使用缓存的regex -可能是因为regex解析设置时间) 对于大块大小的匹配效率更低(可能是由于无法“跳跃”) 对于更长的字符串和非常小的块大小，match在旧的IE上优于slice，但在所有其他系统上仍然失败 jsperf岩石