@jordancpaul的答案修改后的解决方案。

var applyCtor = function(ctor, args)
{
    var instance = new ctor();
    ctor.prototype.constructor.apply(instance, args);
    return instance;
}; 

function FooFactory() {
    var prototype, F = function(){};

    function Foo() {
        var args = Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments),
            i;     
        for (i = 0, this.args = {}; i < args.length; i +=1) {
            this.args[i] = args[i];
        }
        this.bar = 'baz';
        this.print();

        return this;
    }

    prototype = Foo.prototype;
    prototype.print = function () {
        console.log(this.bar);
    };

    F.prototype = prototype;

    return Foo.apply(new F(), Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments));
}

var foo = FooFactory('a', 'b', 'c', 'd', {}, function (){});
console.log('foo:',foo);
foo.print();

如果您的环境支持ECMA Script 2015的扩展操作符(…)，您可以像这样简单地使用它

function Something() {
    // init stuff
}

function createSomething() {
    return new Something(...arguments);
}

注意:现在ECMA Script 2015的规范已经发布，大多数JavaScript引擎都在积极地实现它，这将是最好的方式。

您可以在这里查看在一些主要环境中对扩展操作符的支持。

Matthew Crumley在CoffeeScript中的解决方案:

construct = (constructor, args) ->
    F = -> constructor.apply this, args
    F.prototype = constructor.prototype
    new F

or

createSomething = (->
    F = (args) -> Something.apply this, args
    F.prototype = Something.prototype
    return -> new Something arguments
)()

这可能是一种低效的处理这个问题的方法，但我认为它对我来说足够简单易懂。

function createSomething(){
    // use 'new' operator to instantiate a 'Something' object
    var tmp = new Something(); 

    // If the interpreter supports [JavaScript 1.8.5][2], use 'Object.create'
    // var tmp = Object.create(Something.prototype); 

    // calling the constructor again to initialize the object
    Something.apply(tmp, arguments); 
    return tmp;
}

是的，我们可以，javascript在本质上更多的是原型继承。

function Actor(name, age){
  this.name = name;
  this.age = age;
}

Actor.prototype.name = "unknown";
Actor.prototype.age = "unknown";

Actor.prototype.getName = function() {
    return this.name;
};

Actor.prototype.getAge = function() {
    return this.age;
};

当我们创建一个带有"new"的对象时，我们创建的对象继承getAge()，但如果我们使用apply(…)或call(…)来调用Actor，那么我们为"this"传递了一个对象，但我们传递的对象不会继承自Actor.prototype

除非，我们直接通过apply或调用Actor。原型但是....“this”指向“Actor”。this.name将写入:actor。prototype.name。从而影响所有用Actor创建的其他对象…因为我们覆盖的是原型而不是实例

var rajini = new Actor('Rajinikanth', 31);
console.log(rajini);
console.log(rajini.getName());
console.log(rajini.getAge());

var kamal = new Actor('kamal', 18);
console.log(kamal);
console.log(kamal.getName());
console.log(kamal.getAge());

让我们试试apply

var vijay = Actor.apply(null, ["pandaram", 33]);
if (vijay === undefined) {
    console.log("Actor(....) didn't return anything 
           since we didn't call it with new");
}

var ajith = {};
Actor.apply(ajith, ['ajith', 25]);
console.log(ajith); //Object {name: "ajith", age: 25}
try {
    ajith.getName();
} catch (E) {
    console.log("Error since we didn't inherit ajith.prototype");
}
console.log(Actor.prototype.age); //Unknown
console.log(Actor.prototype.name); //Unknown

通过传递Actor。prototype to Actor.call()作为第一个参数，当Actor()函数运行时，它执行this.name=name，因为“this”将指向Actor。原型,this.name =名称;意味着Actor.prototype.name =名称;

var simbhu = Actor.apply(Actor.prototype, ['simbhu', 28]);
if (simbhu === undefined) {
    console.log("Still undefined since the function didn't return anything.");
}
console.log(Actor.prototype.age); //simbhu
console.log(Actor.prototype.name); //28

var copy = Actor.prototype;
var dhanush = Actor.apply(copy, ["dhanush", 11]);
console.log(dhanush);
console.log("But now we've corrupted Parent.prototype in order to inherit");
console.log(Actor.prototype.age); //11
console.log(Actor.prototype.name); //dhanush

回到最初的问题，如何使用新的操作符与应用，这里是我的....

Function.prototype.new = function(){
    var constructor = this;
    function fn() {return constructor.apply(this, args)}
    var args = Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments);
    fn.prototype = this.prototype;
    return new fn
};

var thalaivar = Actor.new.apply(Parent, ["Thalaivar", 30]);
console.log(thalaivar);