是的，我们可以，javascript在本质上更多的是原型继承。

function Actor(name, age){
  this.name = name;
  this.age = age;
}

Actor.prototype.name = "unknown";
Actor.prototype.age = "unknown";

Actor.prototype.getName = function() {
    return this.name;
};

Actor.prototype.getAge = function() {
    return this.age;
};

当我们创建一个带有"new"的对象时，我们创建的对象继承getAge()，但如果我们使用apply(…)或call(…)来调用Actor，那么我们为"this"传递了一个对象，但我们传递的对象不会继承自Actor.prototype

除非，我们直接通过apply或调用Actor。原型但是....“this”指向“Actor”。this.name将写入:actor。prototype.name。从而影响所有用Actor创建的其他对象…因为我们覆盖的是原型而不是实例

var rajini = new Actor('Rajinikanth', 31);
console.log(rajini);
console.log(rajini.getName());
console.log(rajini.getAge());

var kamal = new Actor('kamal', 18);
console.log(kamal);
console.log(kamal.getName());
console.log(kamal.getAge());

让我们试试apply

var vijay = Actor.apply(null, ["pandaram", 33]);
if (vijay === undefined) {
    console.log("Actor(....) didn't return anything 
           since we didn't call it with new");
}

var ajith = {};
Actor.apply(ajith, ['ajith', 25]);
console.log(ajith); //Object {name: "ajith", age: 25}
try {
    ajith.getName();
} catch (E) {
    console.log("Error since we didn't inherit ajith.prototype");
}
console.log(Actor.prototype.age); //Unknown
console.log(Actor.prototype.name); //Unknown

通过传递Actor。prototype to Actor.call()作为第一个参数，当Actor()函数运行时，它执行this.name=name，因为“this”将指向Actor。原型,this.name =名称;意味着Actor.prototype.name =名称;

var simbhu = Actor.apply(Actor.prototype, ['simbhu', 28]);
if (simbhu === undefined) {
    console.log("Still undefined since the function didn't return anything.");
}
console.log(Actor.prototype.age); //simbhu
console.log(Actor.prototype.name); //28

var copy = Actor.prototype;
var dhanush = Actor.apply(copy, ["dhanush", 11]);
console.log(dhanush);
console.log("But now we've corrupted Parent.prototype in order to inherit");
console.log(Actor.prototype.age); //11
console.log(Actor.prototype.name); //dhanush

回到最初的问题，如何使用新的操作符与应用，这里是我的....

Function.prototype.new = function(){
    var constructor = this;
    function fn() {return constructor.apply(this, args)}
    var args = Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments);
    fn.prototype = this.prototype;
    return new fn
};

var thalaivar = Actor.new.apply(Parent, ["Thalaivar", 30]);
console.log(thalaivar);

function createSomething() {
    var args = Array.prototype.concat.apply([null], arguments);
    return new (Function.prototype.bind.apply(Something, args));
}

如果您的目标浏览器不支持ECMAScript 5。绑定，代码将无法工作。这是不太可能的，但见兼容性表。

如果您对基于求值的解决方案感兴趣

function createSomething() {
    var q = [];
    for(var i = 0; i < arguments.length; i++)
        q.push("arguments[" + i + "]");
    return eval("new Something(" + q.join(",") + ")");
}

这种构造函数方法在使用或不使用new关键字时都有效:

function Something(foo, bar){
  if (!(this instanceof Something)){
    var obj = Object.create(Something.prototype);
    return Something.apply(obj, arguments);
  }
  this.foo = foo;
  this.bar = bar;
  return this;
}

它假设支持Object。创建，但如果你支持旧的浏览器，你总是可以填充它。请参阅MDN上的支持表。

下面是一个JSBin，可以看到它在控制台输出中的作用。

看看CoffeeScript是如何做到的。

([a,b,c]…)

就变成:

var s;
s = (function(func, args, ctor) {
  ctor.prototype = func.prototype;
  var child = new ctor, result = func.apply(child, args);
  return Object(result) === result ? result : child;
})(Something, [a, b, c], function(){});

在ES6中，Reflect.construct()非常方便:

Reflect.construct(F, args)