是的，我们可以，javascript在本质上更多的是原型继承。

function Actor(name, age){
  this.name = name;
  this.age = age;
}

Actor.prototype.name = "unknown";
Actor.prototype.age = "unknown";

Actor.prototype.getName = function() {
    return this.name;
};

Actor.prototype.getAge = function() {
    return this.age;
};

当我们创建一个带有"new"的对象时，我们创建的对象继承getAge()，但如果我们使用apply(…)或call(…)来调用Actor，那么我们为"this"传递了一个对象，但我们传递的对象不会继承自Actor.prototype

除非，我们直接通过apply或调用Actor。原型但是....“this”指向“Actor”。this.name将写入:actor。prototype.name。从而影响所有用Actor创建的其他对象…因为我们覆盖的是原型而不是实例

var rajini = new Actor('Rajinikanth', 31);
console.log(rajini);
console.log(rajini.getName());
console.log(rajini.getAge());

var kamal = new Actor('kamal', 18);
console.log(kamal);
console.log(kamal.getName());
console.log(kamal.getAge());

让我们试试apply

var vijay = Actor.apply(null, ["pandaram", 33]);
if (vijay === undefined) {
    console.log("Actor(....) didn't return anything 
           since we didn't call it with new");
}

var ajith = {};
Actor.apply(ajith, ['ajith', 25]);
console.log(ajith); //Object {name: "ajith", age: 25}
try {
    ajith.getName();
} catch (E) {
    console.log("Error since we didn't inherit ajith.prototype");
}
console.log(Actor.prototype.age); //Unknown
console.log(Actor.prototype.name); //Unknown

通过传递Actor。prototype to Actor.call()作为第一个参数，当Actor()函数运行时，它执行this.name=name，因为“this”将指向Actor。原型,this.name =名称;意味着Actor.prototype.name =名称;

var simbhu = Actor.apply(Actor.prototype, ['simbhu', 28]);
if (simbhu === undefined) {
    console.log("Still undefined since the function didn't return anything.");
}
console.log(Actor.prototype.age); //simbhu
console.log(Actor.prototype.name); //28

var copy = Actor.prototype;
var dhanush = Actor.apply(copy, ["dhanush", 11]);
console.log(dhanush);
console.log("But now we've corrupted Parent.prototype in order to inherit");
console.log(Actor.prototype.age); //11
console.log(Actor.prototype.name); //dhanush

回到最初的问题，如何使用新的操作符与应用，这里是我的....

Function.prototype.new = function(){
    var constructor = this;
    function fn() {return constructor.apply(this, args)}
    var args = Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments);
    fn.prototype = this.prototype;
    return new fn
};

var thalaivar = Actor.new.apply(Parent, ["Thalaivar", 30]);
console.log(thalaivar);

如果您的环境支持ECMA Script 2015的扩展操作符(…)，您可以像这样简单地使用它

function Something() {
    // init stuff
}

function createSomething() {
    return new Something(...arguments);
}

注意:现在ECMA Script 2015的规范已经发布，大多数JavaScript引擎都在积极地实现它，这将是最好的方式。

您可以在这里查看在一些主要环境中对扩展操作符的支持。

感谢这里的帖子，我这样使用它:

SomeClass = function(arg1, arg2) {
    // ...
}

ReflectUtil.newInstance('SomeClass', 5, 7);

和实现:

/**
 * @param strClass:
 *          class name
 * @param optionals:
 *          constructor arguments
 */
ReflectUtil.newInstance = function(strClass) {
    var args = Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments, 1);
    var clsClass = eval(strClass);
    function F() {
        return clsClass.apply(this, args);
    }
    F.prototype = clsClass.prototype;
    return new F();
};

假设你有一个Items构造函数，它吸收了你给它的所有参数:

function Items () {
    this.elems = [].slice.call(arguments);
}

Items.prototype.sum = function () {
    return this.elems.reduce(function (sum, x) { return sum + x }, 0);
};

你可以用Object.create()创建一个实例，然后用.apply()创建该实例:

var items = Object.create(Items.prototype);
Items.apply(items, [ 1, 2, 3, 4 ]);

console.log(items.sum());

当运行时输出10，因为1 + 2 + 3 + 4 == 10:

$ node t.js
10

其实最简单的方法是:

function Something (a, b) {
  this.a = a;
  this.b = b;
}
function createSomething(){
    return Something;
}
s = new (createSomething())(1, 2); 
// s == Something {a: 1, b: 2}

这一行代码可以做到:

new (Function.prototype.bind.apply(Something, [null].concat(arguments)));