isinstance工作原理:

if isinstance(obj, MyClass): do_foo(obj)

但是，请记住:如果它看起来像鸭子，如果它听起来像鸭子，它就是鸭子。

编辑:对于None类型，你可以简单地做:

if obj is None: obj = MyClass()

我想这个就可以了

if isinstance(obj, str)

首先，避免所有类型比较。它们很少是必要的。有时，它们有助于检查函数中的参数类型——即使这种情况也很少见。错误类型的数据将引发异常，而这正是您所需要的。

所有基本转换函数都将映射为类型函数。

type(9) is int
type(2.5) is float
type('x') is str
type(u'x') is unicode
type(2+3j) is complex

还有其他一些情况。

isinstance( 'x', basestring )
isinstance( u'u', basestring )
isinstance( 9, int )
isinstance( 2.5, float )
isinstance( (2+3j), complex )

顺便说一句，None从来不需要任何这种类型的检查。None是唯一的实例。None对象是一个单例对象。只检查None

variable is None

顺便说一下，一般情况下不要使用上述方法。使用普通异常和Python本身的自然多态。

我用type(x) == type(y)

例如，如果我想检查一个数组:

type( x ) == type( [] )

字符串检查:

type( x ) == type( '' ) or type( x ) == type( u'' )

如果您想检查None，请使用is

x is None

isinstance()

在你的例子中，isinstance("this is a string"， str)将返回True。

你可能还想读这个:http://www.canonical.org/~kragen/isinstance/

要获取类型，使用__class__成员，如unknown_thing.__class__

Talk of duck-typing is useless here because it doesn't answer a perfectly good question. In my application code I never need to know the type of something, but it's still useful to have a way to learn an object's type. Sometimes I need to get the actual class to validate a unit test. Duck typing gets in the way there because all possible objects have the same API, but only one is correct. Also, sometimes I'm maintaining somebody else's code, and I have no idea what kind of object I've been passed. This is my biggest problem with dynamically typed languages like Python. Version 1 is very easy and quick to develop. Version 2 is a pain in the buns, especially if you didn't write version 1. So sometimes, when I'm working with a function I didn't write, I need to know the type of a parameter, just so I know what methods I can call on it.

这就是__class__参数派上用场的地方。这(据我所知)是获取对象类型的最佳方法(可能是唯一的方法)。