我处理过同样的问题，但在我的情况下，毫秒是四舍五入而不是截断的，这很重要

from datetime import datetime, timedelta

def strftime_ms(datetime_obj):
    y,m,d,H,M,S = datetime_obj.timetuple()[:6]
    ms = timedelta(microseconds = round(datetime_obj.microsecond/1000.0)*1000)
    ms_date = datetime(y,m,d,H,M,S) + ms
    return ms_date.strftime('%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S.%f')[:-3]

datetime
t = datetime.datetime.now()
ms = '%s.%i' % (t.strftime('%H:%M:%S'), t.microsecond/1000)
print(ms)
14:44:37.134

使用strftime:

>>> from datetime import datetime
>>> datetime.utcnow().strftime('%Y%m%d%H%M%S%f')
'20220402055654344968'

我假设您的意思是您正在寻找比datetime.datetime.strftime()更快的东西，并且实际上是从utc时间戳中剥离非alpha字符。

你的方法稍微快一点，我认为你可以通过切片字符串来加快速度:

>>> import timeit
>>> t=timeit.Timer('datetime.utcnow().strftime("%Y%m%d%H%M%S%f")','''
... from datetime import datetime''')
>>> t.timeit(number=10000000)
116.15451288223267

>>> def replaceutc(s):
...     return s\
...         .replace('-','') \
...         .replace(':','') \
...         .replace('.','') \
...         .replace(' ','') \
...         .strip()
... 
>>> t=timeit.Timer('replaceutc(str(datetime.datetime.utcnow()))','''
... from __main__ import replaceutc
... import datetime''')
>>> t.timeit(number=10000000)
77.96774983406067

>>> def sliceutc(s):
...     return s[:4] + s[5:7] + s[8:10] + s[11:13] + s[14:16] + s[17:19] + s[20:]
... 
>>> t=timeit.Timer('sliceutc(str(datetime.utcnow()))','''
... from __main__ import sliceutc
... from datetime import datetime''')
>>> t.timeit(number=10000000)
62.378515005111694

@Cabbi提出了一个问题，在一些系统上(带有Python 2.7的Windows)，微秒格式%f可能会错误地给出“0”，所以简单地修改最后三个字符是不可移植的。这样的系统不遵循文档中指定的行为:

下面的代码小心地以毫秒为单位格式化时间戳:

>>> from datetime import datetime
>>> (dt, micro) = datetime.utcnow().strftime('%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S.%f').split('.')
>>> "%s.%03d" % (dt, int(micro) / 1000)
'2016-02-26 04:37:53.133'

为了得到OP想要的准确输出，我们必须去掉标点符号:

>>> from datetime import datetime
>>> (dt, micro) = datetime.utcnow().strftime('%Y%m%d%H%M%S.%f').split('.')
>>> "%s%03d" % (dt, int(micro) / 1000)
'20160226043839901'

from datetime import datetime
from time import clock

t = datetime.utcnow()
print 't == %s    %s\n\n' % (t,type(t))

n = 100000

te = clock()
for i in xrange(1):
    t_stripped = t.strftime('%Y%m%d%H%M%S%f')
print clock()-te
print t_stripped," t.strftime('%Y%m%d%H%M%S%f')"

print

te = clock()
for i in xrange(1):
    t_stripped = str(t).replace('-','').replace(':','').replace('.','').replace(' ','')
print clock()-te
print t_stripped," str(t).replace('-','').replace(':','').replace('.','').replace(' ','')"

print

te = clock()
for i in xrange(n):
    t_stripped = str(t).translate(None,' -:.')
print clock()-te
print t_stripped," str(t).translate(None,' -:.')"

print

te = clock()
for i in xrange(n):
    s = str(t)
    t_stripped = s[:4] + s[5:7] + s[8:10] + s[11:13] + s[14:16] + s[17:19] + s[20:] 
print clock()-te
print t_stripped," s[:4] + s[5:7] + s[8:10] + s[11:13] + s[14:16] + s[17:19] + s[20:] "

结果

t == 2011-09-28 21:31:45.562000    <type 'datetime.datetime'>


3.33410112179
20110928212155046000  t.strftime('%Y%m%d%H%M%S%f')

1.17067364707
20110928212130453000 str(t).replace('-','').replace(':','').replace('.','').replace(' ','')

0.658806915404
20110928212130453000 str(t).translate(None,' -:.')

0.645189262881
20110928212130453000 s[:4] + s[5:7] + s[8:10] + s[11:13] + s[14:16] + s[17:19] + s[20:]

translate()和slicing方法的使用同时运行 Translate()的优点是可以在一行中使用

在第一个的基础上比较时间:

1.000 * t.strftime('%Y%m%d%H% m% S%f') 0.351 * str (t) .replace(‘-’,”).replace(‘:’,”).replace(‘。’,”).replace (' “,”) 0.198 * str(t)。翻译(,):。) 0.194 * s[4] +[7] +[8:10] +年代[11:13]+[十四16]+年代(十七19)+ 年代(20:)