没有完美的正则表达式，但我认为，基于对RFC5322的研究，这个正则表达式相当强大。用c#字符串插值，我认为也很容易理解。

const string atext = @"a-zA-Z\d!#\$%&'\*\+-/=\?\^_`\{\|\}~";
var localPart = $"[{atext}]+(\\.[{atext}]+)*";
var domain = $"[{atext}]+(\\.[{atext}]+)*";
Assert.That(() => EmailRegex = new Regex($"^{localPart}@{domain}$", Compiled), 
Throws.Nothing);

用NUnit 2.x检查。

这并不满足rfc 5321和5322的所有要求，但它适用于以下定义。

@"^([0-9a-zA-Z]([\+\-_\.][0-9a-zA-Z]+)*)+"@(([0-9a-zA-Z][-\w]*[0-9a-zA-Z]*\.)+[a-zA-Z0-9]{2,17})$";

下面是代码

const String pattern =
   @"^([0-9a-zA-Z]" + //Start with a digit or alphabetical
   @"([\+\-_\.][0-9a-zA-Z]+)*" + // No continuous or ending +-_. chars in email
   @")+" +
   @"@(([0-9a-zA-Z][-\w]*[0-9a-zA-Z]*\.)+[a-zA-Z0-9]{2,17})$";

var validEmails = new[] {
        "ma@hostname.com",
        "ma@hostname.comcom",
        "MA@hostname.coMCom",
        "m.a@hostname.co",
        "m_a1a@hostname.com",
        "ma-a@hostname.com",
        "ma-a@hostname.com.edu",
        "ma-a.aa@hostname.com.edu",
        "ma.h.saraf.onemore@hostname.com.edu",
        "ma12@hostname.com",
        "12@hostname.com",
};
var invalidEmails = new[] {
        "Abc.example.com",     // No `@`
        "A@b@c@example.com",   // multiple `@`
        "ma...ma@jjf.co",      // continuous multiple dots in name
        "ma@jjf.c",            // only 1 char in extension
        "ma@jjf..com",         // continuous multiple dots in domain
        "ma@@jjf.com",         // continuous multiple `@`
        "@majjf.com",          // nothing before `@`
        "ma.@jjf.com",         // nothing after `.`
        "ma_@jjf.com",         // nothing after `_`
        "ma_@jjf",             // no domain extension 
        "ma_@jjf.",            // nothing after `_` and .
        "ma@jjf.",             // nothing after `.`
    };

foreach (var str in validEmails)
{
    Console.WriteLine("{0} - {1} ", str, Regex.IsMatch(str, pattern));
}
foreach (var str in invalidEmails)
{
    Console.WriteLine("{0} - {1} ", str, Regex.IsMatch(str, pattern));
}

没有完美的正则表达式，但我认为，基于对RFC5322的研究，这个正则表达式相当强大。用c#字符串插值，我认为也很容易理解。

const string atext = @"a-zA-Z\d!#\$%&'\*\+-/=\?\^_`\{\|\}~";
var localPart = $"[{atext}]+(\\.[{atext}]+)*";
var domain = $"[{atext}]+(\\.[{atext}]+)*";
Assert.That(() => EmailRegex = new Regex($"^{localPart}@{domain}$", Compiled), 
Throws.Nothing);

用NUnit 2.x检查。

我创建了一个FormValidationUtils类来验证电子邮件:

public static class FormValidationUtils
{
    const string ValidEmailAddressPattern = "^[A-Z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Z0-9.-]+\\.[A-Z]{2,6}$";

    public static bool IsEmailValid(string email)
    {
        var regex = new Regex(ValidEmailAddressPattern, RegexOptions.IgnoreCase);
        return regex.IsMatch(email);
    }
}

我使用:

public bool ValidateEmail(string email)
{
   Regex regex = new Regex("^[a-z0-9!#$%&'*+/=?^_`{|}~-]+(?:\\.[a-z0-9!#$%&'*+/=?^_`{|}~-]+)*@(?:[a-z0-9](?:[a-z0-9-]*[a-z0-9])?\\.)+[a-z0-9](?:[a-z0-9-]*[a-z0-9])?$");
   if (regex.IsMatch(email))
      return true;

     return false;
}

这可以防止其他人在评论中提到的无效邮件:

Abc.@example.com
Abc..123@example.com
name@hotmail
toms.email.@gmail.com
test@-online.com

它还可以防止带有双点的电子邮件:

hello..world@example..com

试着用尽可能多的无效电子邮件地址进行测试。

using System.Text.RegularExpressions;

public static bool IsValidEmail(string email)
{
    return Regex.IsMatch(email, @"\A[a-z0-9]+([-._][a-z0-9]+)*@([a-z0-9]+(-[a-z0-9]+)*\.)+[a-z]{2,4}\z")
        && Regex.IsMatch(email, @"^(?=.{1,64}@.{4,64}$)(?=.{6,100}$).*");
}

请参阅在c#中使用正则表达式验证电子邮件地址。