public static bool ValidateEmail(string str)
{                       
     return Regex.IsMatch(str, @"\w+([-+.']\w+)*@\w+([-.]\w+)*\.\w+([-.]\w+)*");
}

我使用上面的代码来验证电子邮件地址。

new System.ComponentModel.DataAnnotations.EmailAddressAttribute().IsValid(input)

以上反应的组合。我会使用微软首选的方法使用MailAddress，但实现为字符串的扩展:

public static bool IsValidEmailAddress(this string emailaddress)
    {
        try
        {
            MailAddress m = new MailAddress(emailaddress);
            return true;
        }
        catch (FormatException)
        {
            return false;
        }
    }

然后只需验证任何字符串作为电子邮件地址:

string customerEmailAddress = "bert@potato.com";
customerEmailAddress.IsValidEmailAddress()

清洁简单，便于携带。希望它能帮助到别人。电子邮件的正则表达式很乱。

也就是说，MattSwanson有一个关于这个主题的博客，他强烈建议不要使用正则表达式，而是只检查“@”abd可能是一个点。点击这里阅读他的解释:https://mdswanson.com/blog/2013/10/14/how-not-to-validate-email-addresses.html

以下代码是基于微软在github上的数据注释实现的，我认为这是对电子邮件最完整的验证:

public static Regex EmailValidation()
{
    const string pattern = @"^((([a-z]|\d|[!#\$%&'\*\+\-\/=\?\^_`{\|}~]|[\u00A0-\uD7FF\uF900-\uFDCF\uFDF0-\uFFEF])+(\.([a-z]|\d|[!#\$%&'\*\+\-\/=\?\^_`{\|}~]|[\u00A0-\uD7FF\uF900-\uFDCF\uFDF0-\uFFEF])+)*)|((\x22)((((\x20|\x09)*(\x0d\x0a))?(\x20|\x09)+)?(([\x01-\x08\x0b\x0c\x0e-\x1f\x7f]|\x21|[\x23-\x5b]|[\x5d-\x7e]|[\u00A0-\uD7FF\uF900-\uFDCF\uFDF0-\uFFEF])|(\\([\x01-\x09\x0b\x0c\x0d-\x7f]|[\u00A0-\uD7FF\uF900-\uFDCF\uFDF0-\uFFEF]))))*(((\x20|\x09)*(\x0d\x0a))?(\x20|\x09)+)?(\x22)))@((([a-z]|\d|[\u00A0-\uD7FF\uF900-\uFDCF\uFDF0-\uFFEF])|(([a-z]|\d|[\u00A0-\uD7FF\uF900-\uFDCF\uFDF0-\uFFEF])([a-z]|\d|-|\.|_|~|[\u00A0-\uD7FF\uF900-\uFDCF\uFDF0-\uFFEF])*([a-z]|\d|[\u00A0-\uD7FF\uF900-\uFDCF\uFDF0-\uFFEF])))\.)+(([a-z]|[\u00A0-\uD7FF\uF900-\uFDCF\uFDF0-\uFFEF])|(([a-z]|[\u00A0-\uD7FF\uF900-\uFDCF\uFDF0-\uFFEF])([a-z]|\d|-|\.|_|~|[\u00A0-\uD7FF\uF900-\uFDCF\uFDF0-\uFFEF])*([a-z]|[\u00A0-\uD7FF\uF900-\uFDCF\uFDF0-\uFFEF])))\.?$";
    const RegexOptions options = RegexOptions.Compiled | RegexOptions.IgnoreCase | RegexOptions.ExplicitCapture;

    // Set explicit regex match timeout, sufficient enough for email parsing
    // Unless the global REGEX_DEFAULT_MATCH_TIMEOUT is already set
    TimeSpan matchTimeout = TimeSpan.FromSeconds(2);

    try
    {
        if (AppDomain.CurrentDomain.GetData("REGEX_DEFAULT_MATCH_TIMEOUT") == null)
        {
            return new Regex(pattern, options, matchTimeout);
        }
    }
    catch
    {
        // Fallback on error
    }

    // Legacy fallback (without explicit match timeout)
    return new Regex(pattern, options);
}

以下是我从这里收集信息和微软文档后的解决方案:

/// <summary>
/// * TLD support from 2 to 5 chars (modify the values as you want)
/// * Supports: abc@gmail.com.us
/// * Non-sensitive case 
/// * Stops operation if takes longer than 250ms and throw a detailed exception
/// </summary>
/// <param name="email"></param>
/// <returns>valid: true | invalid: false </returns>
/// <exception cref="ArgumentException"></exception>

private bool validateEmailPattern(string email) {
    try {
        return Regex.IsMatch(email,
            @"^([\w\.\-]+)@([\w\-]+)((\.(\w){2,5})+)$",
            RegexOptions.None, TimeSpan.FromMilliseconds(250));
    } catch (RegexMatchTimeoutException) {
        // throw an exception explaining the task was failed 
        _ = email ?? throw new ArgumentException("email, Timeout/failed regexr processing.", nameof(email));
    }
}

Visual studio已经有很多年了。

\w+([-+.']\w+)*@\w+([-.]\w+)*\.\w+([-.]\w+)*

希望这能有所帮助!