你可以在Node.js中使用一个(丑陋的)黑客，直到一个本地方法被提供:

util = require('util');

var promise1 = new Promise (function (resolve) {
}

var promise2 = new Promise (function (resolve) {

    resolve ('foo');
}

state1 = util.inspect (promise1);
state2 = util.inspect (promise2);

if (state1 === 'Promise { <pending> }') {

    console.log('pending'); // pending
}

if (state2 === "Promise { 'foo' }") {

    console.log ('foo') // foo
}

你可以和Promise.resolve赛跑 它不是同步的，但现在就发生了

function promiseState(p, isPending, isResolved, isRejected) {
  Promise.race([p, Promise.resolve('a value that p should not return')]).then(function(value) {
    if (value == 'a value that p should not return') {
      (typeof(isPending) === 'function') && isPending();
    }else {
      (typeof(isResolved) === 'function') && isResolved(value);
    }
  }, function(reason) {
    (typeof(isRejected) === 'function') && isRejected(reason);
  });
}

一个用于测试的小脚本，并理解异步的含义

var startTime = Date.now() - 100000;//padding trick "100001".slice(1) => 00001
function log(msg) {
  console.log((""+(Date.now() - startTime)).slice(1) + ' ' + msg);
  return msg;//for chaining promises
};

function prefix(pref) { return function (value) { log(pref + value); return value; };}

function delay(ms) {
  return function (value) {
    var startTime = Date.now();
    while(Date.now() - startTime < ms) {}
    return value;//for chaining promises
  };
}
setTimeout(log, 0,'timeOut 0 ms');
setTimeout(log, 100,'timeOut 100 ms');
setTimeout(log, 200,'timeOut 200 ms');

var p1 = Promise.resolve('One');
var p2 = new Promise(function(resolve, reject) { setTimeout(resolve, 100, "Two"); });
var p3 = Promise.reject("Three");

p3.catch(delay(200)).then(delay(100)).then(prefix('delayed L3 : '));

promiseState(p1, prefix('p1 Is Pending '), prefix('p1 Is Resolved '), prefix('p1 Is Rejected '));
promiseState(p2, prefix('p2 Is Pending '), prefix('p2 Is Resolved '), prefix('p2 Is Rejected '));
promiseState(p3, prefix('p3 Is Pending '), prefix('p3 Is Resolved '), prefix('p3 Is Rejected '));

p1.then(prefix('Level 1 : ')).then(prefix('Level 2 : ')).then(prefix('Level 3 : '));
p2.then(prefix('Level 1 : ')).then(prefix('Level 2 : ')).then(prefix('Level 3 : '));
p3.catch(prefix('Level 1 : ')).then(prefix('Level 2 : ')).then(prefix('Level 3 : '));
log('end of promises');
delay(100)();
log('end of script');

延迟(0)的结果(注释在延迟中的while)

00001 end of promises
00001 end of script
00001 Level 1 : One
00001 Level 1 : Three
00001 p1 Is Resolved One
00001 p2 Is Pending undefined
00001 p3 Is Rejected Three
00001 Level 2 : One
00001 Level 2 : Three
00001 delayed L3 : Three
00002 Level 3 : One
00002 Level 3 : Three
00006 timeOut 0 ms
00100 timeOut 100 ms
00100 Level 1 : Two
00100 Level 2 : Two
00101 Level 3 : Two
00189 timeOut 200 ms

与firefox(chrome保持顺序)测试的结果

00000 end of promises
00100 end of script
00300 Level 1 : One
00300 Level 1 : Three
00400 p1 Is Resolved One
00400 p2 Is Pending undefined
00400 p3 Is Rejected Three
00400 Level 2 : One
00400 Level 2 : Three
00400 delayed L3 : Three
00400 Level 3 : One
00400 Level 3 : Three
00406 timeOut 0 ms
00406 timeOut 100 ms
00406 timeOut 200 ms
00406 Level 1 : Two
00407 Level 2 : Two
00407 Level 3 : Two

promise estate make .race and .then:第二级

注意:此方法使用未文档化的Node.js内部构件，可以在没有警告的情况下进行更改。

在Node中，你可以使用process.binding('util')来同步确定promise的状态。getPromiseDetails(/* promise */);

这将返回:

[0，]表示未决，

[1， /* value */]表示已实现，或

[2， /* value */]表示拒绝。

const pending = new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(() => resolve('yakko')));;
const fulfilled = Promise.resolve('wakko');
const rejected = Promise.reject('dot');

[pending, fulfilled, rejected].forEach(promise => {
  console.log(process.binding('util').getPromiseDetails(promise));
});

// pending:   [0, ]
// fulfilled: [1, 'wakko']
// rejected:  [2, 'dot']

将其包装到一个helper函数中:

const getStatus = promise => ['pending', 'fulfilled', 'rejected'][
  process.binding('util').getPromiseDetails(promise)[0]
];

getStatus(pending); // pending
getStatus(fulfilled); // fulfilled
getStatus(rejected); // rejected

使用惯用的原型，等待@jib的答案的使用。

Object.defineProperty(Promise.prototype, "state", {
    get: function(){
        const o = {};
        return Promise.race([this, o]).then(
            v => v === o ? "pending" : "resolved",
            () => "rejected");
    }
});

// usage: console.log(await <Your Promise>.state);
(async () => {
    console.log(await Promise.resolve(2).state);  // "resolved"
    console.log(await Promise.reject(0).state);   // "rejected"
    console.log(await new Promise(()=>{}).state); // "pending"
})();

注意，这个异步函数像同步函数一样“几乎”立即执行(或者实际上可能立即执行)。

警告:process.binding(“跑龙套”)。节点16上的getPromiseDetails未定义!

基准:

候选人:

/**
 * https://stackoverflow.com/a/47009572/5318303
 */
const isPromisePending1 = (() => { // noinspection JSUnresolvedFunction
    const util = process.binding('util')  // noinspection JSUnresolvedFunction
    return promise => !util.getPromiseDetails(promise)[0]
})()

/**
 * https://stackoverflow.com/a/35852666/5318303
 */
const isPromisePending2 = (promise) => util.inspect(promise) === 'Promise { <pending> }'

/**
 * https://stackoverflow.com/a/35820220/5318303
 */
const isPromisePending3 = (promise) => {
    const t = {}
    return Promise.race([promise, t])
            .then(v => v === t, () => false)
}

测试的承诺:

const a = Promise.resolve()
const b = Promise.reject()
const c = new Promise(() => {})
const x = (async () => 1)()

运行基准:

const n = 1000000

console.time('isPromisePending1')
for (let i = 0; i < n; i++) {
    isPromisePending1(a)
    isPromisePending1(b)
    isPromisePending1(c)
    isPromisePending1(x)
}
console.timeEnd('isPromisePending1')

console.time('isPromisePending2')
for (let i = 0; i < n; i++) {
    isPromisePending2(a)
    isPromisePending2(b)
    isPromisePending2(c)
    isPromisePending2(x)
}
console.timeEnd('isPromisePending2')

console.time('isPromisePending3')
for (let i = 0; i < n; i++) {
    await isPromisePending3(a)
    await isPromisePending3(b)
    await isPromisePending3(c)
    await isPromisePending3(x)
}
console.timeEnd('isPromisePending3')

结果:

isPromisePending1: 440.694ms
isPromisePending2: 3.354s
isPromisePending3: 4.761s

显然isPromisePending1()太快了(8~10倍)!但它在节点16上不可用!(见上述警告)。

我发现这个解决方案很简单，并且允许我继续使用本机承诺，但添加了有用的同步检查。我也不需要动用整个承诺库。

注意:只有在当前执行线程中出现某种中断，允许promise在检查同步结构之前执行时，这才有效。这使得它比我最初想象的用处更有限——尽管对我的用例仍然有用(感谢Benjamin Gruenbaum指出这一点)。

/**
 * This function allow you to modify a JS Promise by adding some status properties.
 * Based on: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/21485545/is-there-a-way-to-tell-if-an-es6-promise-is-fulfilled-rejected-resolved
 * But modified according to the specs of promises : https://promisesaplus.com/
 */
function MakeQuerablePromise(promise) {
    // Don't modify any promise that has been already modified.
    if (promise.isFulfilled) return promise;

    // Set initial state
    var isPending = true;
    var isRejected = false;
    var isFulfilled = false;

    // Observe the promise, saving the fulfillment in a closure scope.
    var result = promise.then(
        function(v) {
            isFulfilled = true;
            isPending = false;
            return v; 
        }, 
        function(e) {
            isRejected = true;
            isPending = false;
            throw e; 
        }
    );

    result.isFulfilled = function() { return isFulfilled; };
    result.isPending = function() { return isPending; };
    result.isRejected = function() { return isRejected; };
    return result;
}

wrappedPromise = MakeQueryablePromise(Promise.resolve(3)); 
setTimeout(function() {console.log(wrappedPromise.isFulfilled())}, 1);

来自https://ourcodeworld.com/articles/read/317/how-to-check-if-a-javascript-promise-has-been-fulfilled-rejected-or-resolved，他们的答案是:是否有一种方法来判断一个ES6承诺是否被履行/拒绝/解决?