当我不小心试图更新对象而不是保存时，我得到了这个问题!

我有

 if (IsNewSchema(model))
            unitOfWork.SchemaRepository.Update(schema);
        else
            unitOfWork.SchemaRepository.Insert(schema);

我本应该这样做的

 if (IsNewSchema(model))
            unitOfWork.SchemaRepository.Insert(schema);
        else
            unitOfWork.SchemaRepository.Update(schema);

该问题是由以下两种原因之一引起的:-

You tried to update a row with one or more properties are Concurrency Mode: Fixed .. and the Optimistic Concurrency prevented the data from being saved. Ie. some changed the row data between the time you received the server data and when you saved your server data. You tried to update or delete a row but the row doesn't exist. Another example of someone changing the data (in this case, removing) in between a retrieve then save OR you're flat our trying to update a field which is not an Identity (ie. StoreGeneratedPattern = Computed) and that row doesn't exist.

我在使用Telerik的RadGrid时遇到了这个问题。我将主键设置为只读的绑定列。如果列是display="false"，它会工作得很好，但readonly="true"导致了问题。我通过将绑定列display=false并添加一个单独的模板列来解决这个问题

<telerik:GridBoundColumn HeaderText="Shouldnt see" Display="false" 
     UniqueName="Id" DataField="Id">
</telerik:GridBoundColumn>
<telerik:GridTemplateColumn HeaderText="Id" UniqueName="IdDisplay">
    <ItemTemplate>
        <asp:Label ID="IDLabel" runat="server" 
            Text='<%# Eval("Id") %>'></asp:Label>                               
    </ItemTemplate>
</telerik:GridTemplateColumn> 

我也有同样的问题。但这是我自己的失误。实际上，我是保存一个对象，而不是添加它。这就是矛盾所在。

行[DatabaseGenerated(System.ComponentModel.DataAnnotations.DatabaseGeneratedOption.None)]在我的例子中发挥了作用:

using System.ComponentModel.DataAnnotations;
using System.ComponentModel.DataAnnotations.Schema;


[Key]
[DatabaseGenerated(DatabaseGeneratedOption.None)]
public int? SomeNumber { get; set; }

我们忘记提到“enctype”，发布“多部分”表单数据。我刚刚面对的另一个场景是…