我如何使Python字典成员访问通过点“。”?
例如,我想写mydict.val而不是mydict['val']。
我还想以这种方式访问嵌套字典。例如
mydict.mydict2.val
会提到
mydict = { 'mydict2': { 'val': ... } }
我如何使Python字典成员访问通过点“。”?
例如,我想写mydict.val而不是mydict['val']。
我还想以这种方式访问嵌套字典。例如
mydict.mydict2.val
会提到
mydict = { 'mydict2': { 'val': ... } }
当前回答
Fabric有一个非常好的、最小的实现。将其扩展为允许嵌套访问,我们可以使用defaultdict,结果看起来像这样:
from collections import defaultdict
class AttributeDict(defaultdict):
def __init__(self):
super(AttributeDict, self).__init__(AttributeDict)
def __getattr__(self, key):
try:
return self[key]
except KeyError:
raise AttributeError(key)
def __setattr__(self, key, value):
self[key] = value
可以这样使用它:
keys = AttributeDict()
keys.abc.xyz.x = 123
keys.abc.xyz.a.b.c = 234
这详细阐述了Kugel的回答“从dict和派生并实现__getattr__和__setattr__”。现在你知道怎么做了!
其他回答
不喜欢。在Python中,属性访问和索引是分开的事情,您不应该希望它们执行相同的操作。创建一个类(可能是由namedtuple创建的),如果你有一些应该具有可访问属性的东西,并使用[]符号从字典中获取一个项。
我的观点:出于我自己的目的,我开发了minydra,一个简单的命令行解析器,包括一个自定义类MinyDict(灵感来自addict):
In [1]: from minydra import MinyDict
In [2]: args = MinyDict({"foo": "bar", "yes.no.maybe": "idontknow"}).pretty_print(); args
╭──────────────────────────────╮
│ foo : bar │
│ yes.no.maybe : idontknow │
╰──────────────────────────────╯
Out[2]: {'foo': 'bar', 'yes.no.maybe': 'idontknow'}
In [3]: args.resolve().pretty_print(); args
╭──────────────────────────╮
│ foo : bar │
│ yes │
│ │no │
│ │ │maybe : idontknow │
╰──────────────────────────╯
Out[3]: {'foo': 'bar', 'yes': {'no': {'maybe': 'idontknow'}}}
In [4]: args.yes.no.maybe
Out[4]: "idontknow"
In [5]: "foo" in args
Out[5]: True
In [6]: "rick" in args
Out[6]: False
In [7]: args.morty is None
Out[7]: True
In [8]: args.items()
Out[8]: dict_items([('foo', 'bar'), ('yes', {'no': {'maybe': 'idontknow'}})])
它通过向json yaml和pickle添加转储/加载方法来上瘾,并且在MinyDict.update()中也有一个严格的模式来防止创建新键(这对于防止命令行中的错字很有用)
I ended up trying BOTH the AttrDict and the Bunch libraries and found them to be way to slow for my uses. After a friend and I looked into it, we found that the main method for writing these libraries results in the library aggressively recursing through a nested object and making copies of the dictionary object throughout. With this in mind, we made two key changes. 1) We made attributes lazy-loaded 2) instead of creating copies of a dictionary object, we create copies of a light-weight proxy object. This is the final implementation. The performance increase of using this code is incredible. When using AttrDict or Bunch, these two libraries alone consumed 1/2 and 1/3 respectively of my request time(what!?). This code reduced that time to almost nothing(somewhere in the range of 0.5ms). This of course depends on your needs, but if you are using this functionality quite a bit in your code, definitely go with something simple like this.
class DictProxy(object):
def __init__(self, obj):
self.obj = obj
def __getitem__(self, key):
return wrap(self.obj[key])
def __getattr__(self, key):
try:
return wrap(getattr(self.obj, key))
except AttributeError:
try:
return self[key]
except KeyError:
raise AttributeError(key)
# you probably also want to proxy important list properties along like
# items(), iteritems() and __len__
class ListProxy(object):
def __init__(self, obj):
self.obj = obj
def __getitem__(self, key):
return wrap(self.obj[key])
# you probably also want to proxy important list properties along like
# __iter__ and __len__
def wrap(value):
if isinstance(value, dict):
return DictProxy(value)
if isinstance(value, (tuple, list)):
return ListProxy(value)
return value
参见https://stackoverflow.com/users/704327/michael-merickel的原始实现。
另一件需要注意的事情是,这个实现非常简单,并且没有实现您可能需要的所有方法。您需要根据需要在DictProxy或ListProxy对象上写入这些内容。
这是一个老问题,但我最近发现sklearn有一个可通过键访问的实现版本字典,即Bunch https://scikit-learn.org/stable/modules/generated/sklearn.utils.Bunch.html#sklearn.utils.Bunch
我一直把它保存在util文件中。您也可以在自己的类中使用它作为mixin。
class dotdict(dict):
"""dot.notation access to dictionary attributes"""
__getattr__ = dict.get
__setattr__ = dict.__setitem__
__delattr__ = dict.__delitem__
mydict = {'val':'it works'}
nested_dict = {'val':'nested works too'}
mydict = dotdict(mydict)
mydict.val
# 'it works'
mydict.nested = dotdict(nested_dict)
mydict.nested.val
# 'nested works too'