使用SimpleNamespace:

>>> from types import SimpleNamespace   
>>> d = dict(x=[1, 2], y=['a', 'b'])
>>> ns = SimpleNamespace(**d)
>>> ns.x
[1, 2]
>>> ns
namespace(x=[1, 2], y=['a', 'b'])

@derek73的答案非常简洁，但它不能被pickle或(深度)复制，并且它在缺少键时返回None。下面的代码修复了这个问题。

编辑:我没有看到上面的答案解决了完全相同的问题(点赞)。我把答案留在这里供参考。

class dotdict(dict):
    __setattr__ = dict.__setitem__
    __delattr__ = dict.__delitem__

    def __getattr__(self, name):
        try:
            return self[name]
        except KeyError:
            raise AttributeError(name)

这是一个老问题，但我最近发现sklearn有一个可通过键访问的实现版本字典，即Bunch https://scikit-learn.org/stable/modules/generated/sklearn.utils.Bunch.html#sklearn.utils.Bunch

一个很微妙的解

class DotDict(dict):

    __setattr__ = dict.__setitem__
    __delattr__ = dict.__delitem__

    def __getattr__(self, key):

        def typer(candidate):
            if isinstance(candidate, dict):
                return DotDict(candidate)

            if isinstance(candidate, str):  # iterable but no need to iter
                return candidate

            try:  # other iterable are processed as list
                return [typer(item) for item in candidate]
            except TypeError:
                return candidate

            return candidate

        return typer(dict.get(self, key))

I ended up trying BOTH the AttrDict and the Bunch libraries and found them to be way to slow for my uses. After a friend and I looked into it, we found that the main method for writing these libraries results in the library aggressively recursing through a nested object and making copies of the dictionary object throughout. With this in mind, we made two key changes. 1) We made attributes lazy-loaded 2) instead of creating copies of a dictionary object, we create copies of a light-weight proxy object. This is the final implementation. The performance increase of using this code is incredible. When using AttrDict or Bunch, these two libraries alone consumed 1/2 and 1/3 respectively of my request time(what!?). This code reduced that time to almost nothing(somewhere in the range of 0.5ms). This of course depends on your needs, but if you are using this functionality quite a bit in your code, definitely go with something simple like this.

class DictProxy(object):
    def __init__(self, obj):
        self.obj = obj

    def __getitem__(self, key):
        return wrap(self.obj[key])

    def __getattr__(self, key):
        try:
            return wrap(getattr(self.obj, key))
        except AttributeError:
            try:
                return self[key]
            except KeyError:
                raise AttributeError(key)

    # you probably also want to proxy important list properties along like
    # items(), iteritems() and __len__

class ListProxy(object):
    def __init__(self, obj):
        self.obj = obj

    def __getitem__(self, key):
        return wrap(self.obj[key])

    # you probably also want to proxy important list properties along like
    # __iter__ and __len__

def wrap(value):
    if isinstance(value, dict):
        return DictProxy(value)
    if isinstance(value, (tuple, list)):
        return ListProxy(value)
    return value

参见https://stackoverflow.com/users/704327/michael-merickel的原始实现。

另一件需要注意的事情是，这个实现非常简单，并且没有实现您可能需要的所有方法。您需要根据需要在DictProxy或ListProxy对象上写入这些内容。

您可以使用SimpleNamespace来实现这一点

from types import SimpleNamespace
# Assign values
args = SimpleNamespace()
args.username = 'admin'

# Retrive values
print(args.username)  # output: admin