如果你已经在使用pandas，你可以构造一个pandas Series或DataFrame，从中你可以通过点语法访问项目:

1级字典:

import pandas as pd

my_dictionary = pd.Series({
  'key1': 'value1',
  'key2': 'value2'
})

print(my_dictionary.key1)
# Output: value1

2级字典:

import pandas as pd

my_dictionary = pd.DataFrame({
  'key1': {
    'inner_key1': 'value1'
  },
  'key2': {
    'inner_key2': 'value2'
  }
})

print(my_dictionary.key1.inner_key1)
# Output: value1

请注意，这可能在规范化数据结构(其中每个字典条目都具有相同的结构)下工作得更好。在上面的第二个例子中，得到的DataFrame是:

              key1    key2
inner_key1  value1     NaN
inner_key2     NaN  value2

def dict_to_object(dick):
    # http://stackoverflow.com/a/1305663/968442

    class Struct:
        def __init__(self, **entries):
            self.__dict__.update(entries)

    return Struct(**dick)

如果一个人决定永久地将字典转换为对象，这应该做到。您可以在访问之前创建一个丢弃对象。

d = dict_to_object(d)

派生自dict和并实现__getattr__和__setattr__。

或者你也可以用Bunch，非常相似。

我不认为这是可能的monkeypatch内置字典类。

我喜欢Munch，它提供了很多方便的选项在点访问。

进口蒙克 Temp_1 = {'person': {' fname': 'senthil'， 'lname': 'ramalingam'}} Dict_munch = munch.munchify(temp_1) dict_munch.person.fname

如果你已经在使用pandas，你可以构造一个pandas Series或DataFrame，从中你可以通过点语法访问项目:

1级字典:

import pandas as pd

my_dictionary = pd.Series({
  'key1': 'value1',
  'key2': 'value2'
})

print(my_dictionary.key1)
# Output: value1

2级字典:

import pandas as pd

my_dictionary = pd.DataFrame({
  'key1': {
    'inner_key1': 'value1'
  },
  'key2': {
    'inner_key2': 'value2'
  }
})

print(my_dictionary.key1.inner_key1)
# Output: value1

请注意，这可能在规范化数据结构(其中每个字典条目都具有相同的结构)下工作得更好。在上面的第二个例子中，得到的DataFrame是:

              key1    key2
inner_key1  value1     NaN
inner_key2     NaN  value2

I ended up trying BOTH the AttrDict and the Bunch libraries and found them to be way to slow for my uses. After a friend and I looked into it, we found that the main method for writing these libraries results in the library aggressively recursing through a nested object and making copies of the dictionary object throughout. With this in mind, we made two key changes. 1) We made attributes lazy-loaded 2) instead of creating copies of a dictionary object, we create copies of a light-weight proxy object. This is the final implementation. The performance increase of using this code is incredible. When using AttrDict or Bunch, these two libraries alone consumed 1/2 and 1/3 respectively of my request time(what!?). This code reduced that time to almost nothing(somewhere in the range of 0.5ms). This of course depends on your needs, but if you are using this functionality quite a bit in your code, definitely go with something simple like this.

class DictProxy(object):
    def __init__(self, obj):
        self.obj = obj

    def __getitem__(self, key):
        return wrap(self.obj[key])

    def __getattr__(self, key):
        try:
            return wrap(getattr(self.obj, key))
        except AttributeError:
            try:
                return self[key]
            except KeyError:
                raise AttributeError(key)

    # you probably also want to proxy important list properties along like
    # items(), iteritems() and __len__

class ListProxy(object):
    def __init__(self, obj):
        self.obj = obj

    def __getitem__(self, key):
        return wrap(self.obj[key])

    # you probably also want to proxy important list properties along like
    # __iter__ and __len__

def wrap(value):
    if isinstance(value, dict):
        return DictProxy(value)
    if isinstance(value, (tuple, list)):
        return ListProxy(value)
    return value

参见https://stackoverflow.com/users/704327/michael-merickel的原始实现。

另一件需要注意的事情是，这个实现非常简单，并且没有实现您可能需要的所有方法。您需要根据需要在DictProxy或ListProxy对象上写入这些内容。