I ended up trying BOTH the AttrDict and the Bunch libraries and found them to be way to slow for my uses. After a friend and I looked into it, we found that the main method for writing these libraries results in the library aggressively recursing through a nested object and making copies of the dictionary object throughout. With this in mind, we made two key changes. 1) We made attributes lazy-loaded 2) instead of creating copies of a dictionary object, we create copies of a light-weight proxy object. This is the final implementation. The performance increase of using this code is incredible. When using AttrDict or Bunch, these two libraries alone consumed 1/2 and 1/3 respectively of my request time(what!?). This code reduced that time to almost nothing(somewhere in the range of 0.5ms). This of course depends on your needs, but if you are using this functionality quite a bit in your code, definitely go with something simple like this.

class DictProxy(object):
    def __init__(self, obj):
        self.obj = obj

    def __getitem__(self, key):
        return wrap(self.obj[key])

    def __getattr__(self, key):
        try:
            return wrap(getattr(self.obj, key))
        except AttributeError:
            try:
                return self[key]
            except KeyError:
                raise AttributeError(key)

    # you probably also want to proxy important list properties along like
    # items(), iteritems() and __len__

class ListProxy(object):
    def __init__(self, obj):
        self.obj = obj

    def __getitem__(self, key):
        return wrap(self.obj[key])

    # you probably also want to proxy important list properties along like
    # __iter__ and __len__

def wrap(value):
    if isinstance(value, dict):
        return DictProxy(value)
    if isinstance(value, (tuple, list)):
        return ListProxy(value)
    return value

参见https://stackoverflow.com/users/704327/michael-merickel的原始实现。

另一件需要注意的事情是，这个实现非常简单，并且没有实现您可能需要的所有方法。您需要根据需要在DictProxy或ListProxy对象上写入这些内容。

派生自dict和并实现__getattr__和__setattr__。

或者你也可以用Bunch，非常相似。

我不认为这是可能的monkeypatch内置字典类。

通过pip安装dotmap

pip install dotmap

它能做你想让它做的所有事情，并继承dict的子类，所以它的操作就像一个普通的字典:

from dotmap import DotMap

m = DotMap()
m.hello = 'world'
m.hello
m.hello += '!'
# m.hello and m['hello'] now both return 'world!'
m.val = 5
m.val2 = 'Sam'

最重要的是，你可以将它转换为dict对象:

d = m.toDict()
m = DotMap(d) # automatic conversion in constructor

这意味着如果你想访问的东西已经是字典形式的，你可以把它转换成DotMap来方便访问:

import json
jsonDict = json.loads(text)
data = DotMap(jsonDict)
print data.location.city

最后，它会自动创建新的子DotMap实例，你可以这样做:

m = DotMap()
m.people.steve.age = 31

与Bunch的比较

完全公开:我是DotMap的创造者。我创建它是因为Bunch缺少这些功能

记住添加的顺序项并按此顺序迭代 自动创建子DotMap，当你有很多层次结构时，这节省了时间，并使代码更干净 从字典构造并递归地将所有子字典实例转换为DotMap

不喜欢。在Python中，属性访问和索引是分开的事情，您不应该希望它们执行相同的操作。创建一个类(可能是由namedtuple创建的)，如果你有一些应该具有可访问属性的东西，并使用[]符号从字典中获取一个项。

用于无限级别的字典、列表、字典的列表和列表的字典的嵌套。

它还支持酸洗

这是这个答案的延伸。

class DotDict(dict):
    # https://stackoverflow.com/a/70665030/913098
    """
    Example:
    m = Map({'first_name': 'Eduardo'}, last_name='Pool', age=24, sports=['Soccer'])

    Iterable are assumed to have a constructor taking list as input.
    """

    def __init__(self, *args, **kwargs):
        super(DotDict, self).__init__(*args, **kwargs)

        args_with_kwargs = []
        for arg in args:
            args_with_kwargs.append(arg)
        args_with_kwargs.append(kwargs)
        args = args_with_kwargs

        for arg in args:
            if isinstance(arg, dict):
                for k, v in arg.items():
                    self[k] = v
                    if isinstance(v, dict):
                        self[k] = DotDict(v)
                    elif isinstance(v, str) or isinstance(v, bytes):
                        self[k] = v
                    elif isinstance(v, Iterable):
                        klass = type(v)
                        map_value: List[Any] = []
                        for e in v:
                            map_e = DotDict(e) if isinstance(e, dict) else e
                            map_value.append(map_e)
                        self[k] = klass(map_value)



    def __getattr__(self, attr):
        return self.get(attr)

    def __setattr__(self, key, value):
        self.__setitem__(key, value)

    def __setitem__(self, key, value):
        super(DotDict, self).__setitem__(key, value)
        self.__dict__.update({key: value})

    def __delattr__(self, item):
        self.__delitem__(item)

    def __delitem__(self, key):
        super(DotDict, self).__delitem__(key)
        del self.__dict__[key]

    def __getstate__(self):
        return self.__dict__

    def __setstate__(self, d):
        self.__dict__.update(d)


if __name__ == "__main__":
    import pickle
    def test_map():
        d = {
            "a": 1,
            "b": {
                "c": "d",
                "e": 2,
                "f": None
            },
            "g": [],
            "h": [1, "i"],
            "j": [1, "k", {}],
            "l":
                [
                    1,
                    "m",
                    {
                        "n": [3],
                        "o": "p",
                        "q": {
                            "r": "s",
                            "t": ["u", 5, {"v": "w"}, ],
                            "x": ("z", 1)
                        }
                    }
                ],
        }
        map_d = DotDict(d)
        w = map_d.l[2].q.t[2].v
        assert w == "w"

        pickled = pickle.dumps(map_d)
        unpickled = pickle.loads(pickled)
        assert unpickled == map_d

        kwargs_check = DotDict(a=1, b=[dict(c=2, d="3"), 5])
        assert kwargs_check.b[0].d == "3"

        kwargs_and_args_check = DotDict(d, a=1, b=[dict(c=2, d="3"), 5])
        assert kwargs_and_args_check.l[2].q.t[2].v == "w"
        assert kwargs_and_args_check.b[0].d == "3"



    test_map()

可以使用dotsi来支持完整列表、dict和递归，并使用一些扩展方法

pip install dotsi

and

>>> import dotsi
>>> 
>>> d = dotsi.Dict({"foo": {"bar": "baz"}})     # Basic
>>> d.foo.bar
'baz'
>>> d.users = [{"id": 0, "name": "Alice"}]   # List
>>> d.users[0].name
'Alice'
>>> d.users.append({"id": 1, "name": "Becca"}); # Append
>>> d.users[1].name
'Becca'
>>> d.users += [{"id": 2, "name": "Cathy"}];    # `+=`
>>> d.users[2].name
'Cathy'
>>> d.update({"tasks": [{"id": "a", "text": "Task A"}]});
>>> d.tasks[0].text
'Task A'
>>> d.tasks[0].tags = ["red", "white", "blue"];
>>> d.tasks[0].tags[2];
'blue'
>>> d.tasks[0].pop("tags")                      # `.pop()`
['red', 'white', 'blue']
>>> 
>>> import pprint
>>> pprint.pprint(d)
{'foo': {'bar': 'baz'},
 'tasks': [{'id': 'a', 'text': 'Task A'}],
 'users': [{'id': 0, 'name': 'Alice'},
           {'id': 1, 'name': 'Becca'},
           {'id': 2, 'name': 'Cathy'}]}
>>> 
>>> type(d.users)       # dotsi.Dict (AKA dotsi.DotsiDict)
<class 'dotsi.DotsiList'>
>>> type(d.users[0])    # dotsi.List (AKA dotsi.DotsiList)
<class 'dotsi.DotsiDict'> 
>>>