I ended up trying BOTH the AttrDict and the Bunch libraries and found them to be way to slow for my uses. After a friend and I looked into it, we found that the main method for writing these libraries results in the library aggressively recursing through a nested object and making copies of the dictionary object throughout. With this in mind, we made two key changes. 1) We made attributes lazy-loaded 2) instead of creating copies of a dictionary object, we create copies of a light-weight proxy object. This is the final implementation. The performance increase of using this code is incredible. When using AttrDict or Bunch, these two libraries alone consumed 1/2 and 1/3 respectively of my request time(what!?). This code reduced that time to almost nothing(somewhere in the range of 0.5ms). This of course depends on your needs, but if you are using this functionality quite a bit in your code, definitely go with something simple like this.

class DictProxy(object):
    def __init__(self, obj):
        self.obj = obj

    def __getitem__(self, key):
        return wrap(self.obj[key])

    def __getattr__(self, key):
        try:
            return wrap(getattr(self.obj, key))
        except AttributeError:
            try:
                return self[key]
            except KeyError:
                raise AttributeError(key)

    # you probably also want to proxy important list properties along like
    # items(), iteritems() and __len__

class ListProxy(object):
    def __init__(self, obj):
        self.obj = obj

    def __getitem__(self, key):
        return wrap(self.obj[key])

    # you probably also want to proxy important list properties along like
    # __iter__ and __len__

def wrap(value):
    if isinstance(value, dict):
        return DictProxy(value)
    if isinstance(value, (tuple, list)):
        return ListProxy(value)
    return value

参见https://stackoverflow.com/users/704327/michael-merickel的原始实现。

另一件需要注意的事情是，这个实现非常简单，并且没有实现您可能需要的所有方法。您需要根据需要在DictProxy或ListProxy对象上写入这些内容。

您可以使用SimpleNamespace来实现这一点

from types import SimpleNamespace
# Assign values
args = SimpleNamespace()
args.username = 'admin'

# Retrive values
print(args.username)  # output: admin

使用namedtuple允许点访问。

它就像一个轻量级对象，也具有元组的属性。

它允许定义属性并使用点操作符访问它们。

from collections import namedtuple
Data = namedtuple('Data', ['key1', 'key2'])

dataObj = Data(val1, key2=val2) # can instantiate using keyword arguments and positional arguments

使用点运算符访问

dataObj.key1 # Gives val1
datObj.key2 # Gives val2

使用元组索引进行访问

dataObj[0] # Gives val1
dataObj[1] # Gives val2

但记住这是一个元组;不是字典。因此下面的代码将给出错误

dataObj['key1'] # Gives TypeError: tuple indices must be integers or slices, not str

参考:namedtuple

不是对OP问题的直接回答，但受到启发，也许对一些人有用。我已经创建了一个基于对象的解决方案使用内部__dict__(在任何方式优化代码)

payload = {
    "name": "John",
    "location": {
        "lat": 53.12312312,
        "long": 43.21345112
    },
    "numbers": [
        {
            "role": "home",
            "number": "070-12345678"
        },
        {
            "role": "office",
            "number": "070-12345679"
        }
    ]
}


class Map(object):
    """
    Dot style access to object members, access raw values
    with an underscore e.g.

    class Foo(Map):
        def foo(self):
            return self.get('foo') + 'bar'

    obj = Foo(**{'foo': 'foo'})

    obj.foo => 'foobar'
    obj._foo => 'foo'

    """

    def __init__(self, *args, **kwargs):
        for arg in args:
            if isinstance(arg, dict):
                for k, v in arg.iteritems():
                    self.__dict__[k] = v
                    self.__dict__['_' + k] = v

        if kwargs:
            for k, v in kwargs.iteritems():
                self.__dict__[k] = v
                self.__dict__['_' + k] = v

    def __getattribute__(self, attr):
        if hasattr(self, 'get_' + attr):
            return object.__getattribute__(self, 'get_' + attr)()
        else:
            return object.__getattribute__(self, attr)

    def get(self, key):
        try:
            return self.__dict__.get('get_' + key)()
        except (AttributeError, TypeError):
            return self.__dict__.get(key)

    def __repr__(self):
        return u"<{name} object>".format(
            name=self.__class__.__name__
        )


class Number(Map):
    def get_role(self):
        return self.get('role')

    def get_number(self):
        return self.get('number')


class Location(Map):
    def get_latitude(self):
        return self.get('lat') + 1

    def get_longitude(self):
        return self.get('long') + 1


class Item(Map):
    def get_name(self):
        return self.get('name') + " Doe"

    def get_location(self):
        return Location(**self.get('location'))

    def get_numbers(self):
        return [Number(**n) for n in self.get('numbers')]


# Tests

obj = Item({'foo': 'bar'}, **payload)

assert type(obj) == Item
assert obj._name == "John"
assert obj.name == "John Doe"
assert type(obj.location) == Location
assert obj.location._lat == 53.12312312
assert obj.location._long == 43.21345112
assert obj.location.latitude == 54.12312312
assert obj.location.longitude == 44.21345112

for n in obj.numbers:
    assert type(n) == Number
    if n.role == 'home':
        assert n.number == "070-12345678"
    if n.role == 'office':
        assert n.number == "070-12345679"

我不喜欢在(超过)10年前的火灾中添加另一个日志，但我也会检查dotwiz库，它是我最近发布的——实际上就在今年。

它是一个相对较小的库，在基准测试中，它在get(访问)和设置(创建)时间方面也表现得非常好，至少与其他备选方案相比是这样。

通过pip安装dotwiz

pip install dotwiz

它能做你想让它做的所有事情，并继承dict的子类，所以它的操作就像一个普通的字典:

from dotwiz import DotWiz

dw = DotWiz()
dw.hello = 'world'
dw.hello
dw.hello += '!'
# dw.hello and dw['hello'] now both return 'world!'
dw.val = 5
dw.val2 = 'Sam'

最重要的是，你可以将它转换为dict对象:

d = dw.to_dict()
dw = DotWiz(d) # automatic conversion in constructor

这意味着如果你想访问的东西已经是dict形式的，你可以把它变成一个dotwz来方便访问:

import json
json_dict = json.loads(text)
data = DotWiz(json_dict)
print data.location.city

最后，我正在做的一些令人兴奋的事情是一个现有的特性请求，这样它就会自动创建新的子DotWiz实例，这样你就可以做这样的事情:

dw = DotWiz()
dw['people.steve.age'] = 31

dw
# ✫(people=✫(steve=✫(age=31)))

与点图比较

我在下面添加了一个快速而粗略的性能比较。

首先，用pip安装两个库:

pip install dotwiz dotmap

为了进行基准测试，我编写了以下代码:

from timeit import timeit

from dotwiz import DotWiz
from dotmap import DotMap


d = {'hey': {'so': [{'this': {'is': {'pretty': {'cool': True}}}}]}}

dw = DotWiz(d)
# ✫(hey=✫(so=[✫(this=✫(is=✫(pretty={'cool'})))]))

dm = DotMap(d)
# DotMap(hey=DotMap(so=[DotMap(this=DotMap(is=DotMap(pretty={'cool'})))]))

assert dw.hey.so[0].this['is'].pretty.cool == dm.hey.so[0].this['is'].pretty.cool

n = 100_000

print('dotwiz (create):  ', round(timeit('DotWiz(d)', number=n, globals=globals()), 3))
print('dotmap (create):  ', round(timeit('DotMap(d)', number=n, globals=globals()), 3))
print('dotwiz (get):  ', round(timeit("dw.hey.so[0].this['is'].pretty.cool", number=n, globals=globals()), 3))
print('dotmap (get):  ', round(timeit("dm.hey.so[0].this['is'].pretty.cool", number=n, globals=globals()), 3))

结果，在我的M1 Mac上运行Python 3.10:

dotwiz (create):   0.189
dotmap (create):   1.085
dotwiz (get):   0.014
dotmap (get):   0.335

Fabric有一个非常好的、最小的实现。将其扩展为允许嵌套访问，我们可以使用defaultdict，结果看起来像这样:

from collections import defaultdict

class AttributeDict(defaultdict):
    def __init__(self):
        super(AttributeDict, self).__init__(AttributeDict)

    def __getattr__(self, key):
        try:
            return self[key]
        except KeyError:
            raise AttributeError(key)

    def __setattr__(self, key, value):
        self[key] = value

可以这样使用它:

keys = AttributeDict()
keys.abc.xyz.x = 123
keys.abc.xyz.a.b.c = 234

这详细阐述了Kugel的回答“从dict和派生并实现__getattr__和__setattr__”。现在你知道怎么做了!