我如何使Python字典成员访问通过点“。”?
例如,我想写mydict.val而不是mydict['val']。
我还想以这种方式访问嵌套字典。例如
mydict.mydict2.val
会提到
mydict = { 'mydict2': { 'val': ... } }
我如何使Python字典成员访问通过点“。”?
例如,我想写mydict.val而不是mydict['val']。
我还想以这种方式访问嵌套字典。例如
mydict.mydict2.val
会提到
mydict = { 'mydict2': { 'val': ... } }
当前回答
用于无限级别的字典、列表、字典的列表和列表的字典的嵌套。
它还支持酸洗
这是这个答案的延伸。
class DotDict(dict):
# https://stackoverflow.com/a/70665030/913098
"""
Example:
m = Map({'first_name': 'Eduardo'}, last_name='Pool', age=24, sports=['Soccer'])
Iterable are assumed to have a constructor taking list as input.
"""
def __init__(self, *args, **kwargs):
super(DotDict, self).__init__(*args, **kwargs)
args_with_kwargs = []
for arg in args:
args_with_kwargs.append(arg)
args_with_kwargs.append(kwargs)
args = args_with_kwargs
for arg in args:
if isinstance(arg, dict):
for k, v in arg.items():
self[k] = v
if isinstance(v, dict):
self[k] = DotDict(v)
elif isinstance(v, str) or isinstance(v, bytes):
self[k] = v
elif isinstance(v, Iterable):
klass = type(v)
map_value: List[Any] = []
for e in v:
map_e = DotDict(e) if isinstance(e, dict) else e
map_value.append(map_e)
self[k] = klass(map_value)
def __getattr__(self, attr):
return self.get(attr)
def __setattr__(self, key, value):
self.__setitem__(key, value)
def __setitem__(self, key, value):
super(DotDict, self).__setitem__(key, value)
self.__dict__.update({key: value})
def __delattr__(self, item):
self.__delitem__(item)
def __delitem__(self, key):
super(DotDict, self).__delitem__(key)
del self.__dict__[key]
def __getstate__(self):
return self.__dict__
def __setstate__(self, d):
self.__dict__.update(d)
if __name__ == "__main__":
import pickle
def test_map():
d = {
"a": 1,
"b": {
"c": "d",
"e": 2,
"f": None
},
"g": [],
"h": [1, "i"],
"j": [1, "k", {}],
"l":
[
1,
"m",
{
"n": [3],
"o": "p",
"q": {
"r": "s",
"t": ["u", 5, {"v": "w"}, ],
"x": ("z", 1)
}
}
],
}
map_d = DotDict(d)
w = map_d.l[2].q.t[2].v
assert w == "w"
pickled = pickle.dumps(map_d)
unpickled = pickle.loads(pickled)
assert unpickled == map_d
kwargs_check = DotDict(a=1, b=[dict(c=2, d="3"), 5])
assert kwargs_check.b[0].d == "3"
kwargs_and_args_check = DotDict(d, a=1, b=[dict(c=2, d="3"), 5])
assert kwargs_and_args_check.l[2].q.t[2].v == "w"
assert kwargs_and_args_check.b[0].d == "3"
test_map()
其他回答
I ended up trying BOTH the AttrDict and the Bunch libraries and found them to be way to slow for my uses. After a friend and I looked into it, we found that the main method for writing these libraries results in the library aggressively recursing through a nested object and making copies of the dictionary object throughout. With this in mind, we made two key changes. 1) We made attributes lazy-loaded 2) instead of creating copies of a dictionary object, we create copies of a light-weight proxy object. This is the final implementation. The performance increase of using this code is incredible. When using AttrDict or Bunch, these two libraries alone consumed 1/2 and 1/3 respectively of my request time(what!?). This code reduced that time to almost nothing(somewhere in the range of 0.5ms). This of course depends on your needs, but if you are using this functionality quite a bit in your code, definitely go with something simple like this.
class DictProxy(object):
def __init__(self, obj):
self.obj = obj
def __getitem__(self, key):
return wrap(self.obj[key])
def __getattr__(self, key):
try:
return wrap(getattr(self.obj, key))
except AttributeError:
try:
return self[key]
except KeyError:
raise AttributeError(key)
# you probably also want to proxy important list properties along like
# items(), iteritems() and __len__
class ListProxy(object):
def __init__(self, obj):
self.obj = obj
def __getitem__(self, key):
return wrap(self.obj[key])
# you probably also want to proxy important list properties along like
# __iter__ and __len__
def wrap(value):
if isinstance(value, dict):
return DictProxy(value)
if isinstance(value, (tuple, list)):
return ListProxy(value)
return value
参见https://stackoverflow.com/users/704327/michael-merickel的原始实现。
另一件需要注意的事情是,这个实现非常简单,并且没有实现您可能需要的所有方法。您需要根据需要在DictProxy或ListProxy对象上写入这些内容。
我最近遇到了“Box”库,它也做同样的事情。
安装命令:pip install python-box
例子:
from box import Box
mydict = {"key1":{"v1":0.375,
"v2":0.625},
"key2":0.125,
}
mydict = Box(mydict)
print(mydict.key1.v1)
我发现它比其他现有的库(如dotmap)更有效,当你有大量嵌套字典时,dotmap会产生python递归错误。
链接到图书馆和详细信息:https://pypi.org/project/python-box/
我试了一下:
class dotdict(dict):
def __getattr__(self, name):
return self[name]
你也可以尝试__getattribute__。
使每个字典都是一种类型的dotdict就足够了,如果你想从多层字典初始化它,也可以尝试实现__init__。
获得点访问(但不是数组访问)的一个简单方法是在Python中使用一个普通对象。是这样的:
class YourObject:
def __init__(self, *args, **kwargs):
for k, v in kwargs.items():
setattr(self, k, v)
...像这样使用它:
>>> obj = YourObject(key="value")
>>> print(obj.key)
"value"
... 把它转换成字典:
>>> print(obj.__dict__)
{"key": "value"}
语言本身不支持这一点,但有时这仍然是一个有用的需求。除了Bunch recipe,你还可以写一个小方法,可以使用虚线字符串访问字典:
def get_var(input_dict, accessor_string):
"""Gets data from a dictionary using a dotted accessor-string"""
current_data = input_dict
for chunk in accessor_string.split('.'):
current_data = current_data.get(chunk, {})
return current_data
这将支持如下内容:
>> test_dict = {'thing': {'spam': 12, 'foo': {'cheeze': 'bar'}}}
>> output = get_var(test_dict, 'thing.spam.foo.cheeze')
>> print output
'bar'
>>