不喜欢。在Python中，属性访问和索引是分开的事情，您不应该希望它们执行相同的操作。创建一个类(可能是由namedtuple创建的)，如果你有一些应该具有可访问属性的东西，并使用[]符号从字典中获取一个项。

用于无限级别的字典、列表、字典的列表和列表的字典的嵌套。

它还支持酸洗

这是这个答案的延伸。

class DotDict(dict):
    # https://stackoverflow.com/a/70665030/913098
    """
    Example:
    m = Map({'first_name': 'Eduardo'}, last_name='Pool', age=24, sports=['Soccer'])

    Iterable are assumed to have a constructor taking list as input.
    """

    def __init__(self, *args, **kwargs):
        super(DotDict, self).__init__(*args, **kwargs)

        args_with_kwargs = []
        for arg in args:
            args_with_kwargs.append(arg)
        args_with_kwargs.append(kwargs)
        args = args_with_kwargs

        for arg in args:
            if isinstance(arg, dict):
                for k, v in arg.items():
                    self[k] = v
                    if isinstance(v, dict):
                        self[k] = DotDict(v)
                    elif isinstance(v, str) or isinstance(v, bytes):
                        self[k] = v
                    elif isinstance(v, Iterable):
                        klass = type(v)
                        map_value: List[Any] = []
                        for e in v:
                            map_e = DotDict(e) if isinstance(e, dict) else e
                            map_value.append(map_e)
                        self[k] = klass(map_value)



    def __getattr__(self, attr):
        return self.get(attr)

    def __setattr__(self, key, value):
        self.__setitem__(key, value)

    def __setitem__(self, key, value):
        super(DotDict, self).__setitem__(key, value)
        self.__dict__.update({key: value})

    def __delattr__(self, item):
        self.__delitem__(item)

    def __delitem__(self, key):
        super(DotDict, self).__delitem__(key)
        del self.__dict__[key]

    def __getstate__(self):
        return self.__dict__

    def __setstate__(self, d):
        self.__dict__.update(d)


if __name__ == "__main__":
    import pickle
    def test_map():
        d = {
            "a": 1,
            "b": {
                "c": "d",
                "e": 2,
                "f": None
            },
            "g": [],
            "h": [1, "i"],
            "j": [1, "k", {}],
            "l":
                [
                    1,
                    "m",
                    {
                        "n": [3],
                        "o": "p",
                        "q": {
                            "r": "s",
                            "t": ["u", 5, {"v": "w"}, ],
                            "x": ("z", 1)
                        }
                    }
                ],
        }
        map_d = DotDict(d)
        w = map_d.l[2].q.t[2].v
        assert w == "w"

        pickled = pickle.dumps(map_d)
        unpickled = pickle.loads(pickled)
        assert unpickled == map_d

        kwargs_check = DotDict(a=1, b=[dict(c=2, d="3"), 5])
        assert kwargs_check.b[0].d == "3"

        kwargs_and_args_check = DotDict(d, a=1, b=[dict(c=2, d="3"), 5])
        assert kwargs_and_args_check.l[2].q.t[2].v == "w"
        assert kwargs_and_args_check.b[0].d == "3"



    test_map()

不是对OP问题的直接回答，但受到启发，也许对一些人有用。我已经创建了一个基于对象的解决方案使用内部__dict__(在任何方式优化代码)

payload = {
    "name": "John",
    "location": {
        "lat": 53.12312312,
        "long": 43.21345112
    },
    "numbers": [
        {
            "role": "home",
            "number": "070-12345678"
        },
        {
            "role": "office",
            "number": "070-12345679"
        }
    ]
}


class Map(object):
    """
    Dot style access to object members, access raw values
    with an underscore e.g.

    class Foo(Map):
        def foo(self):
            return self.get('foo') + 'bar'

    obj = Foo(**{'foo': 'foo'})

    obj.foo => 'foobar'
    obj._foo => 'foo'

    """

    def __init__(self, *args, **kwargs):
        for arg in args:
            if isinstance(arg, dict):
                for k, v in arg.iteritems():
                    self.__dict__[k] = v
                    self.__dict__['_' + k] = v

        if kwargs:
            for k, v in kwargs.iteritems():
                self.__dict__[k] = v
                self.__dict__['_' + k] = v

    def __getattribute__(self, attr):
        if hasattr(self, 'get_' + attr):
            return object.__getattribute__(self, 'get_' + attr)()
        else:
            return object.__getattribute__(self, attr)

    def get(self, key):
        try:
            return self.__dict__.get('get_' + key)()
        except (AttributeError, TypeError):
            return self.__dict__.get(key)

    def __repr__(self):
        return u"<{name} object>".format(
            name=self.__class__.__name__
        )


class Number(Map):
    def get_role(self):
        return self.get('role')

    def get_number(self):
        return self.get('number')


class Location(Map):
    def get_latitude(self):
        return self.get('lat') + 1

    def get_longitude(self):
        return self.get('long') + 1


class Item(Map):
    def get_name(self):
        return self.get('name') + " Doe"

    def get_location(self):
        return Location(**self.get('location'))

    def get_numbers(self):
        return [Number(**n) for n in self.get('numbers')]


# Tests

obj = Item({'foo': 'bar'}, **payload)

assert type(obj) == Item
assert obj._name == "John"
assert obj.name == "John Doe"
assert type(obj.location) == Location
assert obj.location._lat == 53.12312312
assert obj.location._long == 43.21345112
assert obj.location.latitude == 54.12312312
assert obj.location.longitude == 44.21345112

for n in obj.numbers:
    assert type(n) == Number
    if n.role == 'home':
        assert n.number == "070-12345678"
    if n.role == 'office':
        assert n.number == "070-12345679"

kaggle_environments使用的实现是一个名为structify的函数。

class Struct(dict):
    def __init__(self, **entries):
        entries = {k: v for k, v in entries.items() if k != "items"}
        dict.__init__(self, entries)
        self.__dict__.update(entries)

    def __setattr__(self, attr, value):
        self.__dict__[attr] = value
        self[attr] = value

# Added benefit of cloning lists and dicts.
def structify(o):
    if isinstance(o, list):
        return [structify(o[i]) for i in range(len(o))]
    elif isinstance(o, dict):
        return Struct(**{k: structify(v) for k, v in o.items()})
    return o

https://github.com/Kaggle/kaggle-environments/blob/master/kaggle_environments/utils.py

这可能有助于在《ConnectX》等游戏中测试AI模拟代理

from kaggle_environments import structify

obs  = structify({ 'remainingOverageTime': 60, 'step': 0, 'mark': 1, 'board': [0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0]})
conf = structify({ 'timeout': 2, 'actTimeout': 2, 'agentTimeout': 60, 'episodeSteps': 1000, 'runTimeout': 1200, 'columns': 7, 'rows': 6, 'inarow': 4, '__raw_path__': '/kaggle_simulations/agent/main.py' })

def agent(obs, conf):
  action = obs.step % conf.columns
  return action

如果你已经在使用pandas，你可以构造一个pandas Series或DataFrame，从中你可以通过点语法访问项目:

1级字典:

import pandas as pd

my_dictionary = pd.Series({
  'key1': 'value1',
  'key2': 'value2'
})

print(my_dictionary.key1)
# Output: value1

2级字典:

import pandas as pd

my_dictionary = pd.DataFrame({
  'key1': {
    'inner_key1': 'value1'
  },
  'key2': {
    'inner_key2': 'value2'
  }
})

print(my_dictionary.key1.inner_key1)
# Output: value1

请注意，这可能在规范化数据结构(其中每个字典条目都具有相同的结构)下工作得更好。在上面的第二个例子中，得到的DataFrame是:

              key1    key2
inner_key1  value1     NaN
inner_key2     NaN  value2

我不喜欢在(超过)10年前的火灾中添加另一个日志，但我也会检查dotwiz库，它是我最近发布的——实际上就在今年。

它是一个相对较小的库，在基准测试中，它在get(访问)和设置(创建)时间方面也表现得非常好，至少与其他备选方案相比是这样。

通过pip安装dotwiz

pip install dotwiz

它能做你想让它做的所有事情，并继承dict的子类，所以它的操作就像一个普通的字典:

from dotwiz import DotWiz

dw = DotWiz()
dw.hello = 'world'
dw.hello
dw.hello += '!'
# dw.hello and dw['hello'] now both return 'world!'
dw.val = 5
dw.val2 = 'Sam'

最重要的是，你可以将它转换为dict对象:

d = dw.to_dict()
dw = DotWiz(d) # automatic conversion in constructor

这意味着如果你想访问的东西已经是dict形式的，你可以把它变成一个dotwz来方便访问:

import json
json_dict = json.loads(text)
data = DotWiz(json_dict)
print data.location.city

最后，我正在做的一些令人兴奋的事情是一个现有的特性请求，这样它就会自动创建新的子DotWiz实例，这样你就可以做这样的事情:

dw = DotWiz()
dw['people.steve.age'] = 31

dw
# ✫(people=✫(steve=✫(age=31)))

与点图比较

我在下面添加了一个快速而粗略的性能比较。

首先，用pip安装两个库:

pip install dotwiz dotmap

为了进行基准测试，我编写了以下代码:

from timeit import timeit

from dotwiz import DotWiz
from dotmap import DotMap


d = {'hey': {'so': [{'this': {'is': {'pretty': {'cool': True}}}}]}}

dw = DotWiz(d)
# ✫(hey=✫(so=[✫(this=✫(is=✫(pretty={'cool'})))]))

dm = DotMap(d)
# DotMap(hey=DotMap(so=[DotMap(this=DotMap(is=DotMap(pretty={'cool'})))]))

assert dw.hey.so[0].this['is'].pretty.cool == dm.hey.so[0].this['is'].pretty.cool

n = 100_000

print('dotwiz (create):  ', round(timeit('DotWiz(d)', number=n, globals=globals()), 3))
print('dotmap (create):  ', round(timeit('DotMap(d)', number=n, globals=globals()), 3))
print('dotwiz (get):  ', round(timeit("dw.hey.so[0].this['is'].pretty.cool", number=n, globals=globals()), 3))
print('dotmap (get):  ', round(timeit("dm.hey.so[0].this['is'].pretty.cool", number=n, globals=globals()), 3))

结果，在我的M1 Mac上运行Python 3.10:

dotwiz (create):   0.189
dotmap (create):   1.085
dotwiz (get):   0.014
dotmap (get):   0.335