我有一个foreach循环,需要执行一些逻辑时,最后一项是从列表中选择,例如:
foreach (Item result in Model.Results)
{
//if current result is the last item in Model.Results
//then do something in the code
}
我可以知道哪个循环是最后没有使用循环和计数器吗?
我有一个foreach循环,需要执行一些逻辑时,最后一项是从列表中选择,例如:
foreach (Item result in Model.Results)
{
//if current result is the last item in Model.Results
//then do something in the code
}
我可以知道哪个循环是最后没有使用循环和计数器吗?
当前回答
还有更简单的方法吗?
Item last = null;
foreach (Item result in Model.Results)
{
// do something with each item
last = result;
}
//Here Item 'last' contains the last object that came in the last of foreach loop.
DoSomethingOnLastElement(last);
其他回答
如果你只需要对最后一个元素做一些事情(而不是对最后一个元素做一些不同的事情),那么在这里使用LINQ会有所帮助:
Item last = Model.Results.Last();
// do something with last
如果你需要对最后一个元素做一些不同的事情,那么你需要这样的东西:
Item last = Model.Results.Last();
foreach (Item result in Model.Results)
{
// do something with each item
if (result.Equals(last))
{
// do something different with the last item
}
else
{
// do something different with every item but the last
}
}
不过,您可能需要编写一个自定义比较器,以确保您可以判断该项与Last()返回的项相同。
这种方法应该谨慎使用,因为Last可能必须遍历集合。虽然这对于小型集合可能不是问题,但如果它变得很大,可能会对性能产生影响。如果列表包含重复的项,也会失败。在这种情况下,这样的语句可能更合适:
int totalCount = result.Count();
for (int count = 0; count < totalCount; count++)
{
Item result = Model.Results[count];
// do something with each item
if ((count + 1) == totalCount)
{
// do something different with the last item
}
else
{
// do something different with every item but the last
}
}
正如Shimmy所指出的,使用Last()可能会导致性能问题,例如,如果您的集合是LINQ表达式的实时结果。为了防止多次迭代,你可以使用“ForEach”扩展方法,如下所示:
var elements = new[] { "A", "B", "C" };
elements.ForEach((element, info) => {
if (!info.IsLast) {
Console.WriteLine(element);
} else {
Console.WriteLine("Last one: " + element);
}
});
扩展方法看起来像这样(作为额外的奖励,它还会告诉你索引,如果你在看第一个元素):
public static class EnumerableExtensions {
public delegate void ElementAction<in T>(T element, ElementInfo info);
public static void ForEach<T>(this IEnumerable<T> elements, ElementAction<T> action) {
using (IEnumerator<T> enumerator = elements.GetEnumerator())
{
bool isFirst = true;
bool hasNext = enumerator.MoveNext();
int index = 0;
while (hasNext)
{
T current = enumerator.Current;
hasNext = enumerator.MoveNext();
action(current, new ElementInfo(index, isFirst, !hasNext));
isFirst = false;
index++;
}
}
}
public struct ElementInfo {
public ElementInfo(int index, bool isFirst, bool isLast)
: this() {
Index = index;
IsFirst = isFirst;
IsLast = isLast;
}
public int Index { get; private set; }
public bool IsFirst { get; private set; }
public bool IsLast { get; private set; }
}
}
根据@Shimmy的回复,我创建了一个扩展方法,这是每个人都想要的解决方案。它很简单,易于使用,并且只循环遍历集合一次。
internal static class EnumerableExtensions
{
public static void ForEachLast<T>(this IEnumerable<T> collection, Action<T>? actionExceptLast = null, Action<T>? actionOnLast = null)
{
using var enumerator = collection.GetEnumerator();
var isNotLast = enumerator.MoveNext();
while (isNotLast)
{
var current = enumerator.Current;
isNotLast = enumerator.MoveNext();
var action = isNotLast ? actionExceptLast : actionOnLast;
action?.Invoke(current);
}
}
}
这适用于任何IEnumerable< t>。用法如下:
var items = new[] {1, 2, 3, 4, 5};
items.ForEachLast(i => Console.WriteLine($"{i},"), i => Console.WriteLine(i));
输出如下:
1,
2,
3,
4,
5
此外,您还可以将其设置为Select样式方法。然后,在ForEach中重用该扩展。代码是这样的:
internal static class EnumerableExtensions
{
public static void ForEachLast<T>(this IEnumerable<T> collection, Action<T>? actionExceptLast = null, Action<T>? actionOnLast = null) =>
// ReSharper disable once IteratorMethodResultIsIgnored
collection.SelectLast(i => { actionExceptLast?.Invoke(i); return true; }, i => { actionOnLast?.Invoke(i); return true; }).ToArray();
public static IEnumerable<TResult> SelectLast<T, TResult>(this IEnumerable<T> collection, Func<T, TResult>? selectorExceptLast = null, Func<T, TResult>? selectorOnLast = null)
{
using var enumerator = collection.GetEnumerator();
var isNotLast = enumerator.MoveNext();
while (isNotLast)
{
var current = enumerator.Current;
isNotLast = enumerator.MoveNext();
var selector = isNotLast ? selectorExceptLast : selectorOnLast;
//https://stackoverflow.com/a/32580613/294804
if (selector != null)
{
yield return selector.Invoke(current);
}
}
}
}
最好的方法可能是在循环之后执行该步骤:
foreach(Item result in Model.Results)
{
//loop logic
}
//Post execution logic
或者如果你需要对最后的结果做些什么
foreach(Item result in Model.Results)
{
//loop logic
}
Item lastItem = Model.Results[Model.Results.Count - 1];
//Execute logic on lastItem here
List<int> ListInt = new List<int> { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 };
int count = ListInt.Count;
int index = 1;
foreach (var item in ListInt)
{
if (index != count)
{
Console.WriteLine("do something at index number " + index);
}
else
{
Console.WriteLine("Foreach loop, this is the last iteration of the loop " + index);
}
index++;
}
//OR
int count = ListInt.Count;
int index = 1;
foreach (var item in ListInt)
{
if (index < count)
{
Console.WriteLine("do something at index number " + index);
}
else
{
Console.WriteLine("Foreach loop, this is the last iteration of the loop " + index);
}
index++;
}