我想从Bash函数返回一个字符串。
我将用java写这个例子来说明我想做什么:
public String getSomeString() {
return "tadaa";
}
String variable = getSomeString();
下面的示例可以在bash中工作,但是是否有更好的方法来做到这一点?
function getSomeString {
echo "tadaa"
}
VARIABLE=$(getSomeString)
我想从Bash函数返回一个字符串。
我将用java写这个例子来说明我想做什么:
public String getSomeString() {
return "tadaa";
}
String variable = getSomeString();
下面的示例可以在bash中工作,但是是否有更好的方法来做到这一点?
function getSomeString {
echo "tadaa"
}
VARIABLE=$(getSomeString)
当前回答
#实现一个通用的函数返回堆栈:
STACK=()
push() {
STACK+=( "${1}" )
}
pop() {
export $1="${STACK[${#STACK[@]}-1]}"
unset 'STACK[${#STACK[@]}-1]';
}
#用法:
my_func() {
push "Hello world!"
push "Hello world2!"
}
my_func ; pop MESSAGE2 ; pop MESSAGE1
echo ${MESSAGE1} ${MESSAGE2}
其他回答
如前所述,从函数返回字符串的“正确”方法是使用命令替换。如果函数也需要输出到控制台(如@Mani上面提到的),在函数的开头创建一个临时fd并重定向到控制台。在返回字符串之前关闭临时fd。
#!/bin/bash
# file: func_return_test.sh
returnString() {
exec 3>&1 >/dev/tty
local s=$1
s=${s:="some default string"}
echo "writing directly to console"
exec 3>&-
echo "$s"
}
my_string=$(returnString "$*")
echo "my_string: [$my_string]"
执行没有参数的脚本会产生…
# ./func_return_test.sh
writing directly to console
my_string: [some default string]
希望这能帮助到人们
安迪
Bash模式返回标量和数组值对象:
定义
url_parse() { # parse 'url' into: 'url_host', 'url_port', ...
local "$@" # inject caller 'url' argument in local scope
local url_host="..." url_path="..." # calculate 'url_*' components
declare -p ${!url_*} # return only 'url_*' object fields to the caller
}
调用
main() { # invoke url parser and inject 'url_*' results in local scope
eval "$(url_parse url=http://host/path)" # parse 'url'
echo "host=$url_host path=$url_path" # use 'url_*' components
}
您可以回显字符串,但通过将函数(|)连接到其他函数来捕获它。
您可以使用expr来实现,不过ShellCheck报告这种用法已弃用。
Bash自2014年2月4.3版(?)起,除了“eval”之外,还明确支持引用变量或名称引用(namerefs),具有相同的性能和间接效果,并且在你的脚本中可能更清晰,也更难“忘记'eval'而不得不修复此错误”:
declare [-aAfFgilnrtux] [-p] [name[=value] ...]
typeset [-aAfFgilnrtux] [-p] [name[=value] ...]
Declare variables and/or give them attributes
...
-n Give each name the nameref attribute, making it a name reference
to another variable. That other variable is defined by the value
of name. All references and assignments to name, except for⋅
changing the -n attribute itself, are performed on the variable
referenced by name's value. The -n attribute cannot be applied to
array variables.
...
When used in a function, declare and typeset make each name local,
as with the local command, unless the -g option is supplied...
还有:
PARAMETERS A variable can be assigned the nameref attribute using the -n option to the declare or local builtin commands (see the descriptions of declare and local below) to create a nameref, or a reference to another variable. This allows variables to be manipulated indirectly. Whenever the nameref variable is⋅ referenced or assigned to, the operation is actually performed on the variable specified by the nameref variable's value. A nameref is commonly used within shell functions to refer to a variable whose name is passed as an argument to⋅ the function. For instance, if a variable name is passed to a shell function as its first argument, running declare -n ref=$1 inside the function creates a nameref variable ref whose value is the variable name passed as the first argument. References and assignments to ref are treated as references and assignments to the variable whose name was passed as⋅ $1. If the control variable in a for loop has the nameref attribute, the list of words can be a list of shell variables, and a name reference will be⋅ established for each word in the list, in turn, when the loop is executed. Array variables cannot be given the -n attribute. However, nameref variables can reference array variables and subscripted array variables. Namerefs can be⋅ unset using the -n option to the unset builtin. Otherwise, if unset is executed with the name of a nameref variable as an argument, the variable referenced by⋅ the nameref variable will be unset.
例如(EDIT 2:(谢谢你Ron)在函数内部变量名的命名空间(前缀),以最小化外部变量冲突,这最终应该正确地回答了Karsten在评论中提出的问题):
# $1 : string; your variable to contain the return value
function return_a_string () {
declare -n ret=$1
local MYLIB_return_a_string_message="The date is "
MYLIB_return_a_string_message+=$(date)
ret=$MYLIB_return_a_string_message
}
测试这个例子:
$ return_a_string result; echo $result
The date is 20160817
请注意,bash“declare”内置在函数中使用时,默认情况下会使声明的变量为“local”,并且“-n”也可以与“local”一起使用。
我更喜欢区分“重要的声明”变量和“无聊的本地”变量,因此以这种方式使用“声明”和“本地”作为文档。
编辑1 -(对Karsten下面的评论的回应)-我不能再在下面添加评论了,但Karsten的评论让我思考,所以我做了以下测试,工作良好,AFAICT - Karsten如果你读了这篇文章,请从命令行提供一组准确的测试步骤,显示你假设存在的问题,因为以下步骤工作得很好:
$ return_a_string ret; echo $ret
The date is 20170104
(我刚刚将上面的函数粘贴到bash术语中后运行了这个程序——正如您所看到的,结果运行得很好。)
最直接和健壮的解决方案是使用命令替换,就像其他人写的那样:
assign()
{
local x
x="Test"
echo "$x"
}
x=$(assign) # This assigns string "Test" to x
缺点是性能,因为这需要一个单独的过程。
本主题中建议的另一种技术,即传递要赋值的变量的名称作为参数,有副作用,我不推荐它的基本形式。问题是,你可能需要函数中的一些变量来计算返回值,可能发生的情况是,用于存储返回值的变量的名称会干扰其中一个:
assign()
{
local x
x="Test"
eval "$1=\$x"
}
assign y # This assigns string "Test" to y, as expected
assign x # This will NOT assign anything to x in this scope
# because the name "x" is declared as local inside the function
当然,您可以不将函数的内部变量声明为局部变量,但您确实应该始终这样做,否则另一方面,如果存在同名的父作用域,则可能会意外地覆盖父作用域中不相关的变量。
一个可能的解决方法是显式声明传递的变量为全局变量:
assign()
{
local x
eval declare -g $1
x="Test"
eval "$1=\$x"
}
If name "x" is passed as an argument, the second row of the function body will overwrite the previous local declaration. But the names themselves might still interfere, so if you intend to use the value previously stored in the passed variable prior to write the return value there, be aware that you must copy it into another local variable at the very beginning; otherwise the result will be unpredictable! Besides, this will only work in the most recent version of BASH, namely 4.2. More portable code might utilize explicit conditional constructs with the same effect:
assign()
{
if [[ $1 != x ]]; then
local x
fi
x="Test"
eval "$1=\$x"
}
也许最优雅的解决方案是为函数返回值和保留一个全局名称 在您编写的每个函数中一致地使用它。