c++用什么方法把字符串(char *)解析成int?健壮和清晰的错误处理是一个加分项(而不是返回零)。
当前回答
c++ String工具箱库(StrTk)有以下解决方案:
static const std::size_t digit_table_symbol_count = 256;
static const unsigned char digit_table[digit_table_symbol_count] = {
0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, // 0xFF - 0x07
0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, // 0x08 - 0x0F
0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, // 0x10 - 0x17
0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, // 0x18 - 0x1F
0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, // 0x20 - 0x27
0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, // 0x28 - 0x2F
0x00, 0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, // 0x30 - 0x37
0x08, 0x09, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, // 0x38 - 0x3F
0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, // 0x40 - 0x47
0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, // 0x48 - 0x4F
0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, // 0x50 - 0x57
0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, // 0x58 - 0x5F
0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, // 0x60 - 0x67
0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, // 0x68 - 0x6F
0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, // 0x70 - 0x77
0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, // 0x78 - 0x7F
0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, // 0x80 - 0x87
0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, // 0x88 - 0x8F
0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, // 0x90 - 0x97
0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, // 0x98 - 0x9F
0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, // 0xA0 - 0xA7
0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, // 0xA8 - 0xAF
0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, // 0xB0 - 0xB7
0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, // 0xB8 - 0xBF
0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, // 0xC0 - 0xC7
0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, // 0xC8 - 0xCF
0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, // 0xD0 - 0xD7
0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, // 0xD8 - 0xDF
0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, // 0xE0 - 0xE7
0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, // 0xE8 - 0xEF
0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, // 0xF0 - 0xF7
0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF // 0xF8 - 0xFF
};
template<typename InputIterator, typename T>
inline bool string_to_signed_type_converter_impl_itr(InputIterator begin, InputIterator end, T& v)
{
if (0 == std::distance(begin,end))
return false;
v = 0;
InputIterator it = begin;
bool negative = false;
if ('+' == *it)
++it;
else if ('-' == *it)
{
++it;
negative = true;
}
if (end == it)
return false;
while(end != it)
{
const T digit = static_cast<T>(digit_table[static_cast<unsigned int>(*it++)]);
if (0xFF == digit)
return false;
v = (10 * v) + digit;
}
if (negative)
v *= -1;
return true;
}
InputIterator可以是unsigned char*、char*或std::string迭代器，T应该是signed int，例如signed int、int或long
其他回答
传统的C方式仍然有效。我推荐散步或散步。在返回状态和'endPtr'之间，您可以给出良好的诊断输出。它还可以很好地处理多个碱基。
你可以使用stringstream的
int str2int (const string &str) {
stringstream ss(str);
int num;
ss >> num;
return num;
}
从c++ 17开始，你可以从<charconv>头文件中使用std::from_chars。
例如:
#include <iostream>
#include <charconv>
#include <array>
int main()
{
char const * str = "42";
int value = 0;
std::from_chars_result result = std::from_chars(std::begin(str), std::end(str), value);
if(result.error == std::errc::invalid_argument)
{
std::cout << "Error, invalid format";
}
else if(result.error == std::errc::result_out_of_range)
{
std::cout << "Error, value too big for int range";
}
else
{
std::cout << "Success: " << result;
}
}
另外，它还可以处理其他进制，比如十六进制。
在C中，你可以使用int atoi (const char * str)，
解析c字串str，将其内容解释为整数，该整数作为int类型的值返回。
我知道这是一个老问题，但我已经遇到过很多次了，到目前为止，仍然没有找到一个具有以下特征的良好模板解决方案:
可以转换任何基(并检测基类型) 将检测错误的数据(即确保整个字符串，更少的前导/尾随空格，被转换消耗) 将确保无论转换为哪种类型，字符串值的范围都是可接受的。
So, here is mine, with a test strap. Because it uses the C functions strtoull/strtoll under the hood, it always converts first to the largest type available. Then, if you are not using the largest type, it will perform additional range checks to verify your type was not over(under)flowed. For this, it is a little less performant than if one properly chose strtol/strtoul. However, it also works for shorts/chars and, to the best of my knowledge, there exists no standard library function that does that, too.
享受;希望有人觉得它有用。
#include <cstdlib>
#include <cerrno>
#include <limits>
#include <stdexcept>
#include <sstream>
static const int DefaultBase = 10;
template<typename T>
static inline T CstrtoxllWrapper(const char *str, int base = DefaultBase)
{
while (isspace(*str)) str++; // remove leading spaces; verify there's data
if (*str == '\0') { throw std::invalid_argument("str; no data"); } // nothing to convert
// NOTE: for some reason strtoull allows a negative sign, we don't; if
// converting to an unsigned then it must always be positive!
if (!std::numeric_limits<T>::is_signed && *str == '-')
{ throw std::invalid_argument("str; negative"); }
// reset errno and call fn (either strtoll or strtoull)
errno = 0;
char *ePtr;
T tmp = std::numeric_limits<T>::is_signed ? strtoll(str, &ePtr, base)
: strtoull(str, &ePtr, base);
// check for any C errors -- note these are range errors on T, which may
// still be out of the range of the actual type we're using; the caller
// may need to perform additional range checks.
if (errno != 0)
{
if (errno == ERANGE) { throw std::range_error("str; out of range"); }
else if (errno == EINVAL) { throw std::invalid_argument("str; EINVAL"); }
else { throw std::invalid_argument("str; unknown errno"); }
}
// verify everything converted -- extraneous spaces are allowed
if (ePtr != NULL)
{
while (isspace(*ePtr)) ePtr++;
if (*ePtr != '\0') { throw std::invalid_argument("str; bad data"); }
}
return tmp;
}
template<typename T>
T StringToSigned(const char *str, int base = DefaultBase)
{
static const long long max = std::numeric_limits<T>::max();
static const long long min = std::numeric_limits<T>::min();
long long tmp = CstrtoxllWrapper<typeof(tmp)>(str, base); // use largest type
// final range check -- only needed if not long long type; a smart compiler
// should optimize this whole thing out
if (sizeof(T) == sizeof(tmp)) { return tmp; }
if (tmp < min || tmp > max)
{
std::ostringstream err;
err << "str; value " << tmp << " out of " << sizeof(T) * 8
<< "-bit signed range (";
if (sizeof(T) != 1) err << min << ".." << max;
else err << (int) min << ".." << (int) max; // don't print garbage chars
err << ")";
throw std::range_error(err.str());
}
return tmp;
}
template<typename T>
T StringToUnsigned(const char *str, int base = DefaultBase)
{
static const unsigned long long max = std::numeric_limits<T>::max();
unsigned long long tmp = CstrtoxllWrapper<typeof(tmp)>(str, base); // use largest type
// final range check -- only needed if not long long type; a smart compiler
// should optimize this whole thing out
if (sizeof(T) == sizeof(tmp)) { return tmp; }
if (tmp > max)
{
std::ostringstream err;
err << "str; value " << tmp << " out of " << sizeof(T) * 8
<< "-bit unsigned range (0..";
if (sizeof(T) != 1) err << max;
else err << (int) max; // don't print garbage chars
err << ")";
throw std::range_error(err.str());
}
return tmp;
}
template<typename T>
inline T
StringToDecimal(const char *str, int base = DefaultBase)
{
return std::numeric_limits<T>::is_signed ? StringToSigned<T>(str, base)
: StringToUnsigned<T>(str, base);
}
template<typename T>
inline T
StringToDecimal(T &out_convertedVal, const char *str, int base = DefaultBase)
{
return out_convertedVal = StringToDecimal<T>(str, base);
}
/*============================== [ Test Strap ] ==============================*/
#include <inttypes.h>
#include <iostream>
static bool _g_anyFailed = false;
template<typename T>
void TestIt(const char *tName,
const char *s, int base,
bool successExpected = false, T expectedValue = 0)
{
#define FAIL(s) { _g_anyFailed = true; std::cout << s; }
T x;
std::cout << "converting<" << tName << ">b:" << base << " [" << s << "]";
try
{
StringToDecimal<T>(x, s, base);
// get here on success only
if (!successExpected)
{
FAIL(" -- TEST FAILED; SUCCESS NOT EXPECTED!" << std::endl);
}
else
{
std::cout << " -> ";
if (sizeof(T) != 1) std::cout << x;
else std::cout << (int) x; // don't print garbage chars
if (x != expectedValue)
{
FAIL("; FAILED (expected value:" << expectedValue << ")!");
}
std::cout << std::endl;
}
}
catch (std::exception &e)
{
if (successExpected)
{
FAIL( " -- TEST FAILED; EXPECTED SUCCESS!"
<< " (got:" << e.what() << ")" << std::endl);
}
else
{
std::cout << "; expected exception encounterd: [" << e.what() << "]" << std::endl;
}
}
}
#define TEST(t, s, ...) \
TestIt<t>(#t, s, __VA_ARGS__);
int main()
{
std::cout << "============ variable base tests ============" << std::endl;
TEST(int, "-0xF", 0, true, -0xF);
TEST(int, "+0xF", 0, true, 0xF);
TEST(int, "0xF", 0, true, 0xF);
TEST(int, "-010", 0, true, -010);
TEST(int, "+010", 0, true, 010);
TEST(int, "010", 0, true, 010);
TEST(int, "-10", 0, true, -10);
TEST(int, "+10", 0, true, 10);
TEST(int, "10", 0, true, 10);
std::cout << "============ base-10 tests ============" << std::endl;
TEST(int, "-010", 10, true, -10);
TEST(int, "+010", 10, true, 10);
TEST(int, "010", 10, true, 10);
TEST(int, "-10", 10, true, -10);
TEST(int, "+10", 10, true, 10);
TEST(int, "10", 10, true, 10);
TEST(int, "00010", 10, true, 10);
std::cout << "============ base-8 tests ============" << std::endl;
TEST(int, "777", 8, true, 0777);
TEST(int, "-0111 ", 8, true, -0111);
TEST(int, "+0010 ", 8, true, 010);
std::cout << "============ base-16 tests ============" << std::endl;
TEST(int, "DEAD", 16, true, 0xDEAD);
TEST(int, "-BEEF", 16, true, -0xBEEF);
TEST(int, "+C30", 16, true, 0xC30);
std::cout << "============ base-2 tests ============" << std::endl;
TEST(int, "-10011001", 2, true, -153);
TEST(int, "10011001", 2, true, 153);
std::cout << "============ irregular base tests ============" << std::endl;
TEST(int, "Z", 36, true, 35);
TEST(int, "ZZTOP", 36, true, 60457993);
TEST(int, "G", 17, true, 16);
TEST(int, "H", 17);
std::cout << "============ space deliminated tests ============" << std::endl;
TEST(int, "1337 ", 10, true, 1337);
TEST(int, " FEAD", 16, true, 0xFEAD);
TEST(int, " 0711 ", 0, true, 0711);
std::cout << "============ bad data tests ============" << std::endl;
TEST(int, "FEAD", 10);
TEST(int, "1234 asdfklj", 10);
TEST(int, "-0xF", 10);
TEST(int, "+0xF", 10);
TEST(int, "0xF", 10);
TEST(int, "-F", 10);
TEST(int, "+F", 10);
TEST(int, "12.4", 10);
TEST(int, "ABG", 16);
TEST(int, "10011002", 2);
std::cout << "============ int8_t range tests ============" << std::endl;
TEST(int8_t, "7F", 16, true, std::numeric_limits<int8_t>::max());
TEST(int8_t, "80", 16);
TEST(int8_t, "-80", 16, true, std::numeric_limits<int8_t>::min());
TEST(int8_t, "-81", 16);
TEST(int8_t, "FF", 16);
TEST(int8_t, "100", 16);
std::cout << "============ uint8_t range tests ============" << std::endl;
TEST(uint8_t, "7F", 16, true, std::numeric_limits<int8_t>::max());
TEST(uint8_t, "80", 16, true, std::numeric_limits<int8_t>::max()+1);
TEST(uint8_t, "-80", 16);
TEST(uint8_t, "-81", 16);
TEST(uint8_t, "FF", 16, true, std::numeric_limits<uint8_t>::max());
TEST(uint8_t, "100", 16);
std::cout << "============ int16_t range tests ============" << std::endl;
TEST(int16_t, "7FFF", 16, true, std::numeric_limits<int16_t>::max());
TEST(int16_t, "8000", 16);
TEST(int16_t, "-8000", 16, true, std::numeric_limits<int16_t>::min());
TEST(int16_t, "-8001", 16);
TEST(int16_t, "FFFF", 16);
TEST(int16_t, "10000", 16);
std::cout << "============ uint16_t range tests ============" << std::endl;
TEST(uint16_t, "7FFF", 16, true, std::numeric_limits<int16_t>::max());
TEST(uint16_t, "8000", 16, true, std::numeric_limits<int16_t>::max()+1);
TEST(uint16_t, "-8000", 16);
TEST(uint16_t, "-8001", 16);
TEST(uint16_t, "FFFF", 16, true, std::numeric_limits<uint16_t>::max());
TEST(uint16_t, "10000", 16);
std::cout << "============ int32_t range tests ============" << std::endl;
TEST(int32_t, "7FFFFFFF", 16, true, std::numeric_limits<int32_t>::max());
TEST(int32_t, "80000000", 16);
TEST(int32_t, "-80000000", 16, true, std::numeric_limits<int32_t>::min());
TEST(int32_t, "-80000001", 16);
TEST(int32_t, "FFFFFFFF", 16);
TEST(int32_t, "100000000", 16);
std::cout << "============ uint32_t range tests ============" << std::endl;
TEST(uint32_t, "7FFFFFFF", 16, true, std::numeric_limits<int32_t>::max());
TEST(uint32_t, "80000000", 16, true, std::numeric_limits<int32_t>::max()+1);
TEST(uint32_t, "-80000000", 16);
TEST(uint32_t, "-80000001", 16);
TEST(uint32_t, "FFFFFFFF", 16, true, std::numeric_limits<uint32_t>::max());
TEST(uint32_t, "100000000", 16);
std::cout << "============ int64_t range tests ============" << std::endl;
TEST(int64_t, "7FFFFFFFFFFFFFFF", 16, true, std::numeric_limits<int64_t>::max());
TEST(int64_t, "8000000000000000", 16);
TEST(int64_t, "-8000000000000000", 16, true, std::numeric_limits<int64_t>::min());
TEST(int64_t, "-8000000000000001", 16);
TEST(int64_t, "FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF", 16);
TEST(int64_t, "10000000000000000", 16);
std::cout << "============ uint64_t range tests ============" << std::endl;
TEST(uint64_t, "7FFFFFFFFFFFFFFF", 16, true, std::numeric_limits<int64_t>::max());
TEST(uint64_t, "8000000000000000", 16, true, std::numeric_limits<int64_t>::max()+1);
TEST(uint64_t, "-8000000000000000", 16);
TEST(uint64_t, "-8000000000000001", 16);
TEST(uint64_t, "FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF", 16, true, std::numeric_limits<uint64_t>::max());
TEST(uint64_t, "10000000000000000", 16);
std::cout << std::endl << std::endl
<< (_g_anyFailed ? "!! SOME TESTS FAILED !!" : "ALL TESTS PASSED")
<< std::endl;
return _g_anyFailed;
}
StringToDecimal是user-land方法;它是重载的，所以可以像这样调用它:
int a; a = StringToDecimal<int>("100");
或:
int a; StringToDecimal(a, "100");
我讨厌重复int类型，所以更喜欢后者。这确保了如果“a”的类型发生了变化，也不会得到不好的结果。我希望编译器能像这样计算出来:
int a; a = StringToDecimal("100");
.．.但是，c++不推导模板返回类型，所以这是我能得到的最好的。
实现非常简单:
CstrtoxllWrapper包装strtoull和strtoll，根据模板类型的有符号性调用其中一个，并提供一些额外的保证(例如，如果无符号，则不允许负输入，它确保整个字符串被转换)。
CstrtoxllWrapper由StringToSigned和StringToUnsigned使用，具有编译器可用的最大类型(long long/unsigned long long);这允许执行最大的转换。然后，如果有必要，StringToSigned/StringToUnsigned对底层类型执行最后的范围检查。最后，端点方法StringToDecimal根据底层类型的符号性决定调用哪一个StringTo*模板方法。
我认为大多数垃圾可以被编译器优化掉;几乎所有东西都应该是编译时确定的。任何关于这方面的评论对我来说都很有趣!
