我有一个Python脚本，它把一个整数列表作为输入，我需要一次处理四个整数。不幸的是，我无法控制输入，否则我将它作为一个四元素元组列表传入。目前，我以这种方式迭代它:
for i in range(0, len(ints), 4):
# dummy op for example code
foo += ints[i] * ints[i + 1] + ints[i + 2] * ints[i + 3]
不过，它看起来很像“C-think”，这让我怀疑有一种更python的方式来处理这种情况。该列表在迭代后被丢弃，因此不需要保留。也许这样会更好?
while ints:
foo += ints[0] * ints[1] + ints[2] * ints[3]
ints[0:4] = []
不过，感觉还是不太对。: - /
相关问题:在Python中如何将列表分割成大小均匀的块?
当前回答
使用小的函数和东西真的不吸引我;我更喜欢使用切片:
data = [...]
chunk_size = 10000 # or whatever
chunks = [data[i:i+chunk_size] for i in xrange(0,len(data),chunk_size)]
for chunk in chunks:
...
其他回答
关于J.F. Sebastian给出的解决方案:
def chunker(iterable, chunksize):
return zip(*[iter(iterable)]*chunksize)
它很聪明，但有一个缺点——总是返回元组。如何获得字符串代替? 当然，你可以写“.join(chunker(…))”，但无论如何都要构造临时元组。
你可以通过编写自己的zip来摆脱临时元组，就像这样:
class IteratorExhausted(Exception):
pass
def translate_StopIteration(iterable, to=IteratorExhausted):
for i in iterable:
yield i
raise to # StopIteration would get ignored because this is generator,
# but custom exception can leave the generator.
def custom_zip(*iterables, reductor=tuple):
iterators = tuple(map(translate_StopIteration, iterables))
while True:
try:
yield reductor(next(i) for i in iterators)
except IteratorExhausted: # when any of iterators get exhausted.
break
Then
def chunker(data, size, reductor=tuple):
return custom_zip(*[iter(data)]*size, reductor=reductor)
使用示例:
>>> for i in chunker('12345', 2):
... print(repr(i))
...
('1', '2')
('3', '4')
>>> for i in chunker('12345', 2, ''.join):
... print(repr(i))
...
'12'
'34'
下面是我的go works on lists,iter和range…懒洋洋地:
def chunker(it,size):
rv = []
for i,el in enumerate(it,1) :
rv.append(el)
if i % size == 0 :
yield rv
rv = []
if rv : yield rv
几乎变成了一句俏皮话;(
In [95]: list(chunker(range(9),2) )
Out[95]: [[0, 1], [2, 3], [4, 5], [6, 7], [8]]
In [96]: list(chunker([1,2,3,4,5],2) )
Out[96]: [[1, 2], [3, 4], [5]]
In [97]: list(chunker(iter(range(9)),2) )
Out[97]: [[0, 1], [2, 3], [4, 5], [6, 7], [8]]
In [98]: list(chunker(range(9),25) )
Out[98]: [[0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8]]
In [99]: list(chunker(range(9),1) )
Out[99]: [[0], [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8]]
In [101]: %timeit list(chunker(range(101),2) )
11.3 µs ± 68.2 ns per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 100000 loops each)
我喜欢这种方法。它感觉简单而不神奇，支持所有可迭代类型，并且不需要导入。
def chunk_iter(iterable, chunk_size):
it = iter(iterable)
while True:
chunk = tuple(next(it) for _ in range(chunk_size))
if not chunk:
break
yield chunk
要避免所有到列表的转换，请导入itertools和:
>>> for k, g in itertools.groupby(xrange(35), lambda x: x/10):
... list(g)
生产:
...
0 [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]
1 [10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19]
2 [20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29]
3 [30, 31, 32, 33, 34]
>>>
我检查了groupby，它不转换为列表或使用len，所以我(认为)这将延迟每个值的解析，直到它实际使用。不幸的是，没有一个现成的答案(在这个时候)似乎提供了这种变化。
显然，如果你需要依次处理每一项，在g上嵌套一个for循环:
for k,g in itertools.groupby(xrange(35), lambda x: x/10):
for i in g:
# do what you need to do with individual items
# now do what you need to do with the whole group
我对此特别感兴趣的是需要消耗一个生成器，以批量提交最多1000个更改到gmail API:
messages = a_generator_which_would_not_be_smart_as_a_list
for idx, batch in groupby(messages, lambda x: x/1000):
batch_request = BatchHttpRequest()
for message in batch:
batch_request.add(self.service.users().messages().modify(userId='me', id=message['id'], body=msg_labels))
http = httplib2.Http()
self.credentials.authorize(http)
batch_request.execute(http=http)
如果列表很大，执行效率最高的方法是使用生成器:
def get_chunk(iterable, chunk_size):
result = []
for item in iterable:
result.append(item)
if len(result) == chunk_size:
yield tuple(result)
result = []
if len(result) > 0:
yield tuple(result)
for x in get_chunk([1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10], 3):
print x
(1, 2, 3)
(4, 5, 6)
(7, 8, 9)
(10,)
