答案是平台特定的，取决于你的目标。但这里是Mozilla Javascript崩溃函数，我认为这说明了很多挑战，使这个工作:

static JS_NEVER_INLINE void
CrashInJS()
{
    /*
     * We write 123 here so that the machine code for this function is
     * unique. Otherwise the linker, trying to be smart, might use the
     * same code for CrashInJS and for some other function. That
     * messes up the signature in minidumps.
     */

#if defined(WIN32)
    /*
     * We used to call DebugBreak() on Windows, but amazingly, it causes
     * the MSVS 2010 debugger not to be able to recover a call stack.
     */
    *((int *) NULL) = 123;
    exit(3);
#elif defined(__APPLE__)
    /*
     * On Mac OS X, Breakpad ignores signals. Only real Mach exceptions are
     * trapped.
     */
    *((int *) NULL) = 123;  /* To continue from here in GDB: "return" then "continue". */
    raise(SIGABRT);  /* In case above statement gets nixed by the optimizer. */
#else
    raise(SIGABRT);  /* To continue from here in GDB: "signal 0". */
#endif
}

abort()函数可能是最好的选择。它是C标准库的一部分，被定义为“导致异常程序终止”(例如，致命错误或崩溃)。

*( ( char* ) NULL ) = 0;

这将产生一个分割错误。

写入只读内存会导致分割错误，除非你的系统不支持只读内存块。

int main() {
    (int&)main = 0;
}

我在Windows 7上用MingGW 5.3.0测试了它，在Linux Mint上用GCC测试了它。我认为其他编译器和系统也会有类似的效果。

int main()
{
    int *p=3;
    int s;
    while(1) {
        s=*p;
        p++;
    }
}

这是Breakpad中谷歌提供的代码片段。

  volatile int* a = reinterpret_cast<volatile int*>(NULL);
  *a = 1;