我如何才能找到(遍历)有向图中从/到给定节点的所有周期?
例如,我想要这样的东西:
A->B->A
A->B->C->A
而不是: B - > C > B
我如何才能找到(遍历)有向图中从/到给定节点的所有周期?
例如,我想要这样的东西:
A->B->A
A->B->C->A
而不是: B - > C > B
当前回答
我在搜索中找到了这个页面,由于循环与强连接组件不相同,我继续搜索,最后,我找到了一个高效的算法,它列出了有向图的所有(基本)循环。这篇论文来自唐纳德·b·约翰逊(Donald B. Johnson),可以在以下链接中找到:
http://www.cs.tufts.edu/comp/150GA/homeworks/hw1/Johnson%2075.PDF
java实现可以在下面找到:
http://normalisiert.de/code/java/elementaryCycles.zip
约翰逊算法的Mathematica演示可以在这里找到,实现可以从右边下载(“下载作者代码”)。
注:实际上,这个问题有很多算法。本文列举了其中一些:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1137/0205007
根据文章,Johnson的算法是最快的。
其他回答
我发现解决这个问题的最简单的选择是使用名为networkx的python库。
它实现了这个问题的最佳答案中提到的约翰逊算法,但它的执行非常简单。
简而言之,你需要以下几点:
import networkx as nx
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
# Create Directed Graph
G=nx.DiGraph()
# Add a list of nodes:
G.add_nodes_from(["a","b","c","d","e"])
# Add a list of edges:
G.add_edges_from([("a","b"),("b","c"), ("c","a"), ("b","d"), ("d","e"), ("e","a")])
#Return a list of cycles described as a list o nodes
list(nx.simple_cycles(G))
答案:[['a', 'b', 'd', 'e'], ['a', 'b', 'c']]
关于你关于排列周期的问题,请在这里阅读更多: https://www.codechef.com/problems/PCYCLE
您可以尝试以下代码(输入大小和数字number):
# include<cstdio>
using namespace std;
int main()
{
int n;
scanf("%d",&n);
int num[1000];
int visited[1000]={0};
int vindex[2000];
for(int i=1;i<=n;i++)
scanf("%d",&num[i]);
int t_visited=0;
int cycles=0;
int start=0, index;
while(t_visited < n)
{
for(int i=1;i<=n;i++)
{
if(visited[i]==0)
{
vindex[start]=i;
visited[i]=1;
t_visited++;
index=start;
break;
}
}
while(true)
{
index++;
vindex[index]=num[vindex[index-1]];
if(vindex[index]==vindex[start])
break;
visited[vindex[index]]=1;
t_visited++;
}
vindex[++index]=0;
start=index+1;
cycles++;
}
printf("%d\n",cycles,vindex[0]);
for(int i=0;i<(n+2*cycles);i++)
{
if(vindex[i]==0)
printf("\n");
else
printf("%d ",vindex[i]);
}
}
如果你想要在图中找到所有基本电路,你可以使用JAMES C. TIERNAN的EC算法,该算法在1970年的一篇论文中发现。
非常原始的EC算法,因为我设法在php中实现它(希望没有错误如下所示)。如果有循环,它也可以找到。这个实现中的电路(试图克隆原始电路)是非零元素。0在这里代表不存在(我们知道它是空的)。
除此之外,下面的实现使算法更具独立性,这意味着节点可以从任何地方开始,甚至从负数开始,例如-4,-3,-2,..等。
在这两种情况下,都要求节点是顺序的。
你可能需要研究原始论文,James C. Tiernan基本电路算法
<?php
echo "<pre><br><br>";
$G = array(
1=>array(1,2,3),
2=>array(1,2,3),
3=>array(1,2,3)
);
define('N',key(array_slice($G, -1, 1, true)));
$P = array(1=>0,2=>0,3=>0,4=>0,5=>0);
$H = array(1=>$P, 2=>$P, 3=>$P, 4=>$P, 5=>$P );
$k = 1;
$P[$k] = key($G);
$Circ = array();
#[Path Extension]
EC2_Path_Extension:
foreach($G[$P[$k]] as $j => $child ){
if( $child>$P[1] and in_array($child, $P)===false and in_array($child, $H[$P[$k]])===false ){
$k++;
$P[$k] = $child;
goto EC2_Path_Extension;
} }
#[EC3 Circuit Confirmation]
if( in_array($P[1], $G[$P[$k]])===true ){//if PATH[1] is not child of PATH[current] then don't have a cycle
$Circ[] = $P;
}
#[EC4 Vertex Closure]
if($k===1){
goto EC5_Advance_Initial_Vertex;
}
//afou den ksana theoreitai einai asfales na svisoume
for( $m=1; $m<=N; $m++){//H[P[k], m] <- O, m = 1, 2, . . . , N
if( $H[$P[$k-1]][$m]===0 ){
$H[$P[$k-1]][$m]=$P[$k];
break(1);
}
}
for( $m=1; $m<=N; $m++ ){//H[P[k], m] <- O, m = 1, 2, . . . , N
$H[$P[$k]][$m]=0;
}
$P[$k]=0;
$k--;
goto EC2_Path_Extension;
#[EC5 Advance Initial Vertex]
EC5_Advance_Initial_Vertex:
if($P[1] === N){
goto EC6_Terminate;
}
$P[1]++;
$k=1;
$H=array(
1=>array(1=>0,2=>0,3=>0,4=>0,5=>0),
2=>array(1=>0,2=>0,3=>0,4=>0,5=>0),
3=>array(1=>0,2=>0,3=>0,4=>0,5=>0),
4=>array(1=>0,2=>0,3=>0,4=>0,5=>0),
5=>array(1=>0,2=>0,3=>0,4=>0,5=>0)
);
goto EC2_Path_Extension;
#[EC5 Advance Initial Vertex]
EC6_Terminate:
print_r($Circ);
?>
然后这是另一个实现,更独立于图形,没有goto和数组值,而是使用数组键,路径,图形和电路存储为数组键(如果你喜欢使用数组值,只需更改所需的行)。示例图从-4开始,以显示其独立性。
<?php
$G = array(
-4=>array(-4=>true,-3=>true,-2=>true),
-3=>array(-4=>true,-3=>true,-2=>true),
-2=>array(-4=>true,-3=>true,-2=>true)
);
$C = array();
EC($G,$C);
echo "<pre>";
print_r($C);
function EC($G, &$C){
$CNST_not_closed = false; // this flag indicates no closure
$CNST_closed = true; // this flag indicates closure
// define the state where there is no closures for some node
$tmp_first_node = key($G); // first node = first key
$tmp_last_node = $tmp_first_node-1+count($G); // last node = last key
$CNST_closure_reset = array();
for($k=$tmp_first_node; $k<=$tmp_last_node; $k++){
$CNST_closure_reset[$k] = $CNST_not_closed;
}
// define the state where there is no closure for all nodes
for($k=$tmp_first_node; $k<=$tmp_last_node; $k++){
$H[$k] = $CNST_closure_reset; // Key in the closure arrays represent nodes
}
unset($tmp_first_node);
unset($tmp_last_node);
# Start algorithm
foreach($G as $init_node => $children){#[Jump to initial node set]
#[Initial Node Set]
$P = array(); // declare at starup, remove the old $init_node from path on loop
$P[$init_node]=true; // the first key in P is always the new initial node
$k=$init_node; // update the current node
// On loop H[old_init_node] is not cleared cause is never checked again
do{#Path 1,3,7,4 jump here to extend father 7
do{#Path from 1,3,8,5 became 2,4,8,5,6 jump here to extend child 6
$new_expansion = false;
foreach( $G[$k] as $child => $foo ){#Consider each child of 7 or 6
if( $child>$init_node and isset($P[$child])===false and $H[$k][$child]===$CNST_not_closed ){
$P[$child]=true; // add this child to the path
$k = $child; // update the current node
$new_expansion=true;// set the flag for expanding the child of k
break(1); // we are done, one child at a time
} } }while(($new_expansion===true));// Do while a new child has been added to the path
# If the first node is child of the last we have a circuit
if( isset($G[$k][$init_node])===true ){
$C[] = $P; // Leaving this out of closure will catch loops to
}
# Closure
if($k>$init_node){ //if k>init_node then alwaya count(P)>1, so proceed to closure
$new_expansion=true; // $new_expansion is never true, set true to expand father of k
unset($P[$k]); // remove k from path
end($P); $k_father = key($P); // get father of k
$H[$k_father][$k]=$CNST_closed; // mark k as closed
$H[$k] = $CNST_closure_reset; // reset k closure
$k = $k_father; // update k
} } while($new_expansion===true);//if we don't wnter the if block m has the old k$k_father_old = $k;
// Advance Initial Vertex Context
}//foreach initial
}//function
?>
我已经分析并记录了EC,但不幸的是,文档是希腊语。
澄清:
Strongly Connected Components will find all subgraphs that have at least one cycle in them, not all possible cycles in the graph. e.g. if you take all strongly connected components and collapse/group/merge each one of them into one node (i.e. a node per component), you'll get a tree with no cycles (a DAG actually). Each component (which is basically a subgraph with at least one cycle in it) can contain many more possible cycles internally, so SCC will NOT find all possible cycles, it will find all possible groups that have at least one cycle, and if you group them, then the graph will not have cycles. to find all simple cycles in a graph, as others mentioned, Johnson's algorithm is a candidate.
从节点X开始,检查所有子节点(如果无方向,父节点和子节点是等价的)。将这些子节点标记为X的子节点。对于任何这样的子节点A,标记它的子节点是A的子节点,X',其中X'标记为2步远。)如果您稍后点击X并将其标记为X的子节点”,这意味着X处于3节点周期中。回溯到它的父节点很容易(因为算法不支持这一点,所以你可以找到任何一个有X'的父节点)。
注意:如果图是无向的或者有任何双向边,这个算法会变得更复杂,假设你不想在一个周期内两次遍历同一条边。