比如,我有一个脚本,用这行代码调用:
./myscript -vfd ./foo/bar/someFile -o /fizz/someOtherFile
或者这个:
./myscript -v -f -d -o /fizz/someOtherFile ./foo/bar/someFile
什么是公认的解析方式,以便在每种情况下(或两者的某种组合)$v、$f和$d都将设置为true,而$outFile将等于/fiz/someOtherFile?
比如,我有一个脚本,用这行代码调用:
./myscript -vfd ./foo/bar/someFile -o /fizz/someOtherFile
或者这个:
./myscript -v -f -d -o /fizz/someOtherFile ./foo/bar/someFile
什么是公认的解析方式,以便在每种情况下(或两者的某种组合)$v、$f和$d都将设置为true,而$outFile将等于/fiz/someOtherFile?
当前回答
我想提交我的项目:https://github.com/flyingangel/argparser
source argparser.sh
parse_args "$@"
就这么简单。环境将填充与参数同名的变量
其他回答
当我尝试这个问题时,上面的答案似乎有点bug——这是我发现更强大的解决方案:
boolean_arg=""
arg_with_value=""
while [[ $# -gt 0 ]]
do
key="$1"
case $key in
-b|--boolean-arg)
boolean_arg=true
shift
;;
-a|--arg-with-value)
arg_with_value="$2"
shift
shift
;;
-*)
echo "Unknown option: $1"
exit 1
;;
*)
arg_num=$(( $arg_num + 1 ))
case $arg_num in
1)
first_normal_arg="$1"
shift
;;
2)
second_normal_arg="$1"
shift
;;
*)
bad_args=TRUE
esac
;;
esac
done
# Handy to have this here when adding arguments to
# see if they're working. Just edit the '0' to be '1'.
if [[ 0 == 1 ]]; then
echo "first_normal_arg: $first_normal_arg"
echo "second_normal_arg: $second_normal_arg"
echo "boolean_arg: $boolean_arg"
echo "arg_with_value: $arg_with_value"
exit 0
fi
if [[ $bad_args == TRUE || $arg_num < 2 ]]; then
echo "Usage: $(basename "$0") <first-normal-arg> <second-normal-arg> [--boolean-arg] [--arg-with-value VALUE]"
exit 1
fi
这里有一个getopts,它用最少的代码实现解析,并允许您在一种情况下使用eval和substring定义要提取的内容。
基本上eval“local key='val'”
function myrsync() {
local backup=("${@}") args=(); while [[ $# -gt 0 ]]; do k="$1";
case "$k" in
---sourceuser|---sourceurl|---targetuser|---targeturl|---file|---exclude|---include)
eval "local ${k:3}='${2}'"; shift; shift # Past two arguments
;;
*) # Unknown option
args+=("$1"); shift; # Past argument only
;;
esac
done; set -- "${backup[@]}" # Restore $@
echo "${sourceurl}"
}
在这里,将变量声明为局部变量,而不是全局变量。
调用为:
myrsync ---sourceurl http://abc.def.g ---sourceuser myuser ...
${k:3}基本上是一个从键中删除第一个---的子字符串。
我认为这个很简单:
#!/bin/bash
#
readopt='getopts $opts opt;rc=$?;[ "$rc$opt" = "0?" ]&&exit 1;[ $rc = 0 ]||{ shift $[OPTIND-1];false; }'
opts=vfdo:
# Enumerating options
while eval "$readopt"
do
echo OPT:$opt ${OPTARG+OPTARG:$OPTARG}
done
# Enumerating arguments
for arg
do
echo ARG:$arg
done
调用示例:
./myscript -v -do /fizz/someOtherFile -f ./foo/bar/someFile
OPT:v
OPT:d
OPT:o OPTARG:/fizz/someOtherFile
OPT:f
ARG:./foo/bar/someFile
无答案展示了增强的getopt。最热门的答案是误导性的:要么忽略-vfd样式的短选项(OP请求)或位置参数后的选项(OP也请求);并且它忽略解析错误。相反:
使用util-linux或以前的GNUglibc.1中的增强getopt它与GNUglibc的C函数getopt_long()一起工作。本页上没有其他解决方案可以做到这一切:在arguments 2中处理空格、引用字符甚至二进制(非增强型getopt无法做到这一点)它可以在结尾处处理选项:script.sh-o outFile file1 file2-v(getopts不执行此操作)allows=-style long选项:script.sh--outfile=fileOut--infile fileIn(如果自解析,则允许两者都很长)允许组合的短选项,例如-vfd(如果是自解析,则实际工作)允许触摸选项参数,例如-oOutfile或-vfdoOutfile它太旧了,以至于没有GNU系统缺少它(例如,任何Linux都有它)。您可以使用:getopt--test测试它的存在→ 返回值4。其他getopt或shell内置getopt用途有限。
以下通话
myscript -vfd ./foo/bar/someFile -o /fizz/someOtherFile
myscript -v -f -d -o/fizz/someOtherFile -- ./foo/bar/someFile
myscript --verbose --force --debug ./foo/bar/someFile -o/fizz/someOtherFile
myscript --output=/fizz/someOtherFile ./foo/bar/someFile -vfd
myscript ./foo/bar/someFile -df -v --output /fizz/someOtherFile
全部返回
verbose: y, force: y, debug: y, in: ./foo/bar/someFile, out: /fizz/someOtherFile
使用以下myscript
#!/bin/bash
# More safety, by turning some bugs into errors.
# Without `errexit` you don’t need ! and can replace
# ${PIPESTATUS[0]} with a simple $?, but I prefer safety.
set -o errexit -o pipefail -o noclobber -o nounset
# -allow a command to fail with !’s side effect on errexit
# -use return value from ${PIPESTATUS[0]}, because ! hosed $?
! getopt --test > /dev/null
if [[ ${PIPESTATUS[0]} -ne 4 ]]; then
echo 'I’m sorry, `getopt --test` failed in this environment.'
exit 1
fi
# option --output/-o requires 1 argument
LONGOPTS=debug,force,output:,verbose
OPTIONS=dfo:v
# -regarding ! and PIPESTATUS see above
# -temporarily store output to be able to check for errors
# -activate quoting/enhanced mode (e.g. by writing out “--options”)
# -pass arguments only via -- "$@" to separate them correctly
! PARSED=$(getopt --options=$OPTIONS --longoptions=$LONGOPTS --name "$0" -- "$@")
if [[ ${PIPESTATUS[0]} -ne 0 ]]; then
# e.g. return value is 1
# then getopt has complained about wrong arguments to stdout
exit 2
fi
# read getopt’s output this way to handle the quoting right:
eval set -- "$PARSED"
d=n f=n v=n outFile=-
# now enjoy the options in order and nicely split until we see --
while true; do
case "$1" in
-d|--debug)
d=y
shift
;;
-f|--force)
f=y
shift
;;
-v|--verbose)
v=y
shift
;;
-o|--output)
outFile="$2"
shift 2
;;
--)
shift
break
;;
*)
echo "Programming error"
exit 3
;;
esac
done
# handle non-option arguments
if [[ $# -ne 1 ]]; then
echo "$0: A single input file is required."
exit 4
fi
echo "verbose: $v, force: $f, debug: $d, in: $1, out: $outFile"
1增强的getopt可用于大多数“bash系统”,包括Cygwin;在OS X上,尝试brew安装gnu getopt或sudo端口安装getopt2 POSIX exec()约定没有可靠的方法在命令行参数中传递二进制NULL;这些字节过早地结束了参数3 1997年或之前发布的第一个版本(我只追溯到1997年)
我写了一个脚本,可以帮助轻松解析命令行参数https://github.com/unfor19/bargs
示例
$ bash example.sh -n Willy --gender male -a 99
Name: Willy
Age: 99
Gender: male
Location: chocolate-factory
$ bash example.sh -n Meir --gender male
[ERROR] Required argument: age
Usage: bash example.sh -n Willy --gender male -a 99
--person_name | -n [Willy] What is your name?
--age | -a [Required]
--gender | -g [Required]
--location | -l [chocolate-factory] insert your location
$ bash example.sh -h
Usage: bash example.sh -n Willy --gender male -a 99
--person_name | -n [Willy] What is your name?
--age | -a [Required]
--gender | -g [Required]
--location | -l [chocolate-factory] insert your location