比如,我有一个脚本,用这行代码调用:
./myscript -vfd ./foo/bar/someFile -o /fizz/someOtherFile
或者这个:
./myscript -v -f -d -o /fizz/someOtherFile ./foo/bar/someFile
什么是公认的解析方式,以便在每种情况下(或两者的某种组合)$v、$f和$d都将设置为true,而$outFile将等于/fiz/someOtherFile?
比如,我有一个脚本,用这行代码调用:
./myscript -vfd ./foo/bar/someFile -o /fizz/someOtherFile
或者这个:
./myscript -v -f -d -o /fizz/someOtherFile ./foo/bar/someFile
什么是公认的解析方式,以便在每种情况下(或两者的某种组合)$v、$f和$d都将设置为true,而$outFile将等于/fiz/someOtherFile?
当前回答
我想提交我的项目:https://github.com/flyingangel/argparser
source argparser.sh
parse_args "$@"
就这么简单。环境将填充与参数同名的变量
其他回答
来自digitalpeer.com,稍作修改:
用法myscript.sh-p=my_prefix-s=dirname-l=libname
#!/bin/bash
for i in "$@"
do
case $i in
-p=*|--prefix=*)
PREFIX="${i#*=}"
;;
-s=*|--searchpath=*)
SEARCHPATH="${i#*=}"
;;
-l=*|--lib=*)
DIR="${i#*=}"
;;
--default)
DEFAULT=YES
;;
*)
# unknown option
;;
esac
done
echo PREFIX = ${PREFIX}
echo SEARCH PATH = ${SEARCHPATH}
echo DIRS = ${DIR}
echo DEFAULT = ${DEFAULT}
要更好地理解${i#*=},请在本指南中搜索“Substring Removal”。它在功能上等同于调用一个不需要的子流程的‘sed’s/[^=]*=//'<<<“$i”`或调用两个不需要子流程的“echo”$i”|sed’s/[^=]*=//'`。
使用bash模块中的模块“参数”
例子:
#!/bin/bash
. import.sh log arguments
NAME="world"
parse_arguments "-n|--name)NAME;S" -- "$@" || {
error "Cannot parse command line."
exit 1
}
info "Hello, $NAME!"
根据这里的其他答案,这是我的版本:
#!/bin/bash
set -e
function parse() {
for arg in "$@"; do # transform long options to short ones
shift
case "$arg" in
"--name") set -- "$@" "-n" ;;
"--verbose") set -- "$@" "-v" ;;
*) set -- "$@" "$arg"
esac
done
while getopts "n:v" optname # left to ":" are flags that expect a value, right to the ":" are flags that expect nothing
do
case "$optname" in
"n") name=${OPTARG} ;;
"v") verbose=true ;;
esac
done
shift "$((OPTIND-1))" # shift out all the already processed options
}
parse "$@"
echo "hello $name"
if [ ! -z $verbose ]; then echo 'nice to meet you!'; fi
用法:
$ ./parse.sh
hello
$ ./parse.sh -n YOUR_NAME
hello YOUR_NAME
$ ./parse.sh -n YOUR_NAME -v
hello YOUR_NAME
nice to meet you!
$ ./parse.sh -v -n YOUR_NAME
hello YOUR_NAME
nice to meet you!
$ ./parse.sh -v
hello
nice to meet you!
我认为这个很简单:
#!/bin/bash
#
readopt='getopts $opts opt;rc=$?;[ "$rc$opt" = "0?" ]&&exit 1;[ $rc = 0 ]||{ shift $[OPTIND-1];false; }'
opts=vfdo:
# Enumerating options
while eval "$readopt"
do
echo OPT:$opt ${OPTARG+OPTARG:$OPTARG}
done
# Enumerating arguments
for arg
do
echo ARG:$arg
done
调用示例:
./myscript -v -do /fizz/someOtherFile -f ./foo/bar/someFile
OPT:v
OPT:d
OPT:o OPTARG:/fizz/someOtherFile
OPT:f
ARG:./foo/bar/someFile
另一个Shell参数分析器(ASAP)
符合POSIX,无getopt
我受到@bronson相对简单的回答的启发,并试图改进它(不增加太多复杂性)。结果如下:
使用-n[arg]、-abn[arg],--name[arg]和--name=arg样式中的任意一种选项;参数可以按任何顺序出现,循环后$@中只留下位置参数;使用--强制将剩余的参数视为位置参数;检测无效选项和缺少的参数;不依赖于getopt或外部工具(一个功能使用简单的sed命令);便携式,紧凑,可读性强,具有独立功能。
# Convenience functions.
usage_error () { echo >&2 "$(basename $0): $1"; exit 2; }
assert_argument () { test "$1" != "$EOL" || usage_error "$2 requires an argument"; }
# One loop, nothing more.
if [ "$#" != 0 ]; then
EOL=$(printf '\1\3\3\7')
set -- "$@" "$EOL"
while [ "$1" != "$EOL" ]; do
opt="$1"; shift
case "$opt" in
# Your options go here.
-f|--flag) flag='true';;
-n|--name) assert_argument "$1" "$opt"; name="$1"; shift;;
# Arguments processing. You may remove any unneeded line after the 1st.
-|''|[!-]*) set -- "$@" "$opt";; # positional argument, rotate to the end
--*=*) set -- "${opt%%=*}" "${opt#*=}" "$@";; # convert '--name=arg' to '--name' 'arg'
-[!-]?*) set -- $(echo "${opt#-}" | sed 's/\(.\)/ -\1/g') "$@";; # convert '-abc' to '-a' '-b' '-c'
--) while [ "$1" != "$EOL" ]; do set -- "$@" "$1"; shift; done;; # process remaining arguments as positional
-*) usage_error "unknown option: '$opt'";; # catch misspelled options
*) usage_error "this should NEVER happen ($opt)";; # sanity test for previous patterns
esac
done
shift # $EOL
fi
# Do something cool with "$@"... \o/
注:我知道。。。二进制模式为0x01030307的参数可能会破坏逻辑。但是,如果有人在命令行中传递这样的参数,他们应该得到它。