比如,我有一个脚本,用这行代码调用:
./myscript -vfd ./foo/bar/someFile -o /fizz/someOtherFile
或者这个:
./myscript -v -f -d -o /fizz/someOtherFile ./foo/bar/someFile
什么是公认的解析方式,以便在每种情况下(或两者的某种组合)$v、$f和$d都将设置为true,而$outFile将等于/fiz/someOtherFile?
比如,我有一个脚本,用这行代码调用:
./myscript -vfd ./foo/bar/someFile -o /fizz/someOtherFile
或者这个:
./myscript -v -f -d -o /fizz/someOtherFile ./foo/bar/someFile
什么是公认的解析方式,以便在每种情况下(或两者的某种组合)$v、$f和$d都将设置为true,而$outFile将等于/fiz/someOtherFile?
当前回答
假设我们创建一个名为test_args.sh的shell脚本,如下所示
#!/bin/sh
until [ $# -eq 0 ]
do
name=${1:1}; shift;
if [[ -z "$1" || $1 == -* ]] ; then eval "export $name=true"; else eval "export $name=$1"; shift; fi
done
echo "year=$year month=$month day=$day flag=$flag"
运行以下命令后:
sh test_args.sh -year 2017 -flag -month 12 -day 22
输出将是:
year=2017 month=12 day=22 flag=true
其他回答
使用bash模块中的模块“参数”
例子:
#!/bin/bash
. import.sh log arguments
NAME="world"
parse_arguments "-n|--name)NAME;S" -- "$@" || {
error "Cannot parse command line."
exit 1
}
info "Hello, $NAME!"
当我尝试这个问题时,上面的答案似乎有点bug——这是我发现更强大的解决方案:
boolean_arg=""
arg_with_value=""
while [[ $# -gt 0 ]]
do
key="$1"
case $key in
-b|--boolean-arg)
boolean_arg=true
shift
;;
-a|--arg-with-value)
arg_with_value="$2"
shift
shift
;;
-*)
echo "Unknown option: $1"
exit 1
;;
*)
arg_num=$(( $arg_num + 1 ))
case $arg_num in
1)
first_normal_arg="$1"
shift
;;
2)
second_normal_arg="$1"
shift
;;
*)
bad_args=TRUE
esac
;;
esac
done
# Handy to have this here when adding arguments to
# see if they're working. Just edit the '0' to be '1'.
if [[ 0 == 1 ]]; then
echo "first_normal_arg: $first_normal_arg"
echo "second_normal_arg: $second_normal_arg"
echo "boolean_arg: $boolean_arg"
echo "arg_with_value: $arg_with_value"
exit 0
fi
if [[ $bad_args == TRUE || $arg_num < 2 ]]; then
echo "Usage: $(basename "$0") <first-normal-arg> <second-normal-arg> [--boolean-arg] [--arg-with-value VALUE]"
exit 1
fi
另一个Shell参数分析器(ASAP)
符合POSIX,无getopt
我受到@bronson相对简单的回答的启发,并试图改进它(不增加太多复杂性)。结果如下:
使用-n[arg]、-abn[arg],--name[arg]和--name=arg样式中的任意一种选项;参数可以按任何顺序出现,循环后$@中只留下位置参数;使用--强制将剩余的参数视为位置参数;检测无效选项和缺少的参数;不依赖于getopt或外部工具(一个功能使用简单的sed命令);便携式,紧凑,可读性强,具有独立功能。
# Convenience functions.
usage_error () { echo >&2 "$(basename $0): $1"; exit 2; }
assert_argument () { test "$1" != "$EOL" || usage_error "$2 requires an argument"; }
# One loop, nothing more.
if [ "$#" != 0 ]; then
EOL=$(printf '\1\3\3\7')
set -- "$@" "$EOL"
while [ "$1" != "$EOL" ]; do
opt="$1"; shift
case "$opt" in
# Your options go here.
-f|--flag) flag='true';;
-n|--name) assert_argument "$1" "$opt"; name="$1"; shift;;
# Arguments processing. You may remove any unneeded line after the 1st.
-|''|[!-]*) set -- "$@" "$opt";; # positional argument, rotate to the end
--*=*) set -- "${opt%%=*}" "${opt#*=}" "$@";; # convert '--name=arg' to '--name' 'arg'
-[!-]?*) set -- $(echo "${opt#-}" | sed 's/\(.\)/ -\1/g') "$@";; # convert '-abc' to '-a' '-b' '-c'
--) while [ "$1" != "$EOL" ]; do set -- "$@" "$1"; shift; done;; # process remaining arguments as positional
-*) usage_error "unknown option: '$opt'";; # catch misspelled options
*) usage_error "this should NEVER happen ($opt)";; # sanity test for previous patterns
esac
done
shift # $EOL
fi
# Do something cool with "$@"... \o/
注:我知道。。。二进制模式为0x01030307的参数可能会破坏逻辑。但是,如果有人在命令行中传递这样的参数,他们应该得到它。
根据这里的其他答案,这是我的版本:
#!/bin/bash
set -e
function parse() {
for arg in "$@"; do # transform long options to short ones
shift
case "$arg" in
"--name") set -- "$@" "-n" ;;
"--verbose") set -- "$@" "-v" ;;
*) set -- "$@" "$arg"
esac
done
while getopts "n:v" optname # left to ":" are flags that expect a value, right to the ":" are flags that expect nothing
do
case "$optname" in
"n") name=${OPTARG} ;;
"v") verbose=true ;;
esac
done
shift "$((OPTIND-1))" # shift out all the already processed options
}
parse "$@"
echo "hello $name"
if [ ! -z $verbose ]; then echo 'nice to meet you!'; fi
用法:
$ ./parse.sh
hello
$ ./parse.sh -n YOUR_NAME
hello YOUR_NAME
$ ./parse.sh -n YOUR_NAME -v
hello YOUR_NAME
nice to meet you!
$ ./parse.sh -v -n YOUR_NAME
hello YOUR_NAME
nice to meet you!
$ ./parse.sh -v
hello
nice to meet you!
# As long as there is at least one more argument, keep looping
while [[ $# -gt 0 ]]; do
key="$1"
case "$key" in
# This is a flag type option. Will catch either -f or --foo
-f|--foo)
FOO=1
;;
# Also a flag type option. Will catch either -b or --bar
-b|--bar)
BAR=1
;;
# This is an arg value type option. Will catch -o value or --output-file value
-o|--output-file)
shift # past the key and to the value
OUTPUTFILE="$1"
;;
# This is an arg=value type option. Will catch -o=value or --output-file=value
-o=*|--output-file=*)
# No need to shift here since the value is part of the same string
OUTPUTFILE="${key#*=}"
;;
*)
# Do whatever you want with extra options
echo "Unknown option '$key'"
;;
esac
# Shift after checking all the cases to get the next option
shift
done
这使您既可以使用空格分隔的选项/值,也可以使用相等的定义值。
因此,您可以使用以下命令运行脚本:
./myscript --foo -b -o /fizz/file.txt
以及:
./myscript -f --bar -o=/fizz/file.txt
并且两者应该具有相同的最终结果。
赞成的意见:
允许-arg=value和-arg-value适用于bash中可以使用的任何arg名称意思是-a或-arg或--arg或-ar-g或其他纯粹的狂欢。无需学习/使用getopt或getopts
欺骗:
无法组合参数意思是没有-abc。您必须执行-a-b-c