我喜欢Jaco Pretorius的解决方案，但我想通过将“this”关键字指向模块/名称空间对象来使其更有用。 我的煎锅版本:

(function ($, undefined) {

    console.log(this);

}).call(window.myNamespace = window.myNamespace || {}, jQuery);

我认为对于这样一个简单的问题，你们都使用了太多的代码。 没必要为它回购。 这是一个单线函数。

namespace => namespace.split(".").reduce((last, next) => (last[next] = (last[next] || {})), window);

试试吧:

//——定义—— Const namespace = name => name.split(".")。减少(下)(最后,= >(去年[下]=(去年[下一个 ] || {})), 窗口); //——使用---- Const c =命名空间("a.b.c"); c.MyClass = class MyClass {}; //—参见---- Console.log ("a: "， a);

这是Ionuț G. Stan的回答的后续，但通过使用var ClassFirst = this显示了整洁代码的好处。ClassFirst = function(){…}，它利用JavaScript的闭包作用域来减少相同名称空间中的类的名称空间混乱。

var Namespace = new function() {
    var ClassFirst = this.ClassFirst = function() {
        this.abc = 123;
    }

    var ClassSecond = this.ClassSecond = function() {
        console.log("Cluttered way to access another class in namespace: ", new Namespace.ClassFirst().abc);
        console.log("Nicer way to access a class in same namespace: ", new ClassFirst().abc);
    }
}

var Namespace2 = new function() {
    var ClassFirst = this.ClassFirst = function() {
        this.abc = 666;
    }

    var ClassSecond = this.ClassSecond = function() {
        console.log("Cluttered way to access another class in namespace: ", new Namespace2.ClassFirst().abc);
        console.log("Nicer way to access a class in same namespace: ", new ClassFirst().abc);
    }
}

new Namespace.ClassSecond()
new Namespace2.ClassSecond()

输出:

Cluttered way to access another class in namespace: 123
Nicer way to access a class in same namespace: 123
Cluttered way to access another class in namespace: 666
Nicer way to access a class in same namespace: 666

我通常在闭包中构建它:

var MYNS = MYNS || {};

MYNS.subns = (function() {

    function privateMethod() {
        // Do private stuff, or build internal.
        return "Message";
    }

    return {
        someProperty: 'prop value',
        publicMethod: function() {
            return privateMethod() + " stuff";
        }
    };
})();

自从写了这篇文章以来，我的风格在这些年里有了微妙的变化，现在我发现自己是这样写闭包的:

var MYNS = MYNS || {};

MYNS.subns = (function() {
    var internalState = "Message";

    var privateMethod = function() {
        // Do private stuff, or build internal.
        return internalState;
    };
    var publicMethod = function() {
        return privateMethod() + " stuff";
    };

    return {
        someProperty: 'prop value',
        publicMethod: publicMethod
    };
})();

通过这种方式，我发现公共API和实现更容易理解。将return语句视为实现的公共接口。

另一种方式是，我认为它比对象文字形式限制少一点，是这样的:

var ns = new function() {

    var internalFunction = function() {

    };

    this.publicFunction = function() {

    };
};

上面的模式非常类似于模块模式，不管你喜欢与否，它允许你将所有函数公开为public，同时避免了对象字面量的刚性结构。

我使用这种方法:

var myNamespace = {}
myNamespace._construct = function()
{
    var staticVariable = "This is available to all functions created here"

    function MyClass()
    {
       // Depending on the class, we may build all the classes here
       this.publicMethod = function()
       {
          //Do stuff
       }
    }

    // Alternatively, we may use a prototype.
    MyClass.prototype.altPublicMethod = function()
    {
        //Do stuff
    }

    function privateStuff()
    {
    }

    function publicStuff()
    {
       // Code that may call other public and private functions
    }

    // List of things to place publically
    this.publicStuff = publicStuff
    this.MyClass = MyClass
}
myNamespace._construct()

// The following may or may not be in another file
myNamespace.subName = {}
myNamespace.subName._construct = function()
{
   // Build namespace
}
myNamespace.subName._construct()

外部代码可以是:

var myClass = new myNamespace.MyClass();
var myOtherClass = new myNamepace.subName.SomeOtherClass();
myNamespace.subName.publicOtherStuff(someParameter);