我有一条从a到B的直线和一个半径为R的圆。
用什么算法来检查直线是否与圆相交?它在圆边的哪个坐标上?
我有一条从a到B的直线和一个半径为R的圆。
用什么算法来检查直线是否与圆相交?它在圆边的哪个坐标上?
当前回答
采取
E是射线的起点, L是射线的端点, C是你测试的圆心 R是球面的半径
计算: d = L - E(射线方向矢量,从头到尾) f = E - C(从中心球到射线起点的向量)
然后通过…找到交点。 堵塞: P = E + t * d 这是一个参数方程 Px = Ex + tdx Py = Ey + tdy 成 (x - h)2 + (y - k)2 = r2 (h,k) =圆心。
注意:我们在这里将问题简化为2D,我们得到的解决方案也适用于3D
得到:
Expand x2 - 2xh + h2 + y2 - 2yk + k2 - r2 = 0 Plug x = ex + tdx y = ey + tdy ( ex + tdx )2 - 2( ex + tdx )h + h2 + ( ey + tdy )2 - 2( ey + tdy )k + k2 - r2 = 0 Explode ex2 + 2extdx + t2dx2 - 2exh - 2tdxh + h2 + ey2 + 2eytdy + t2dy2 - 2eyk - 2tdyk + k2 - r2 = 0 Group t2( dx2 + dy2 ) + 2t( exdx + eydy - dxh - dyk ) + ex2 + ey2 - 2exh - 2eyk + h2 + k2 - r2 = 0 Finally, t2( d · d ) + 2t( e · d - d · c ) + e · e - 2( e · c ) + c · c - r2 = 0 Where d is the vector d and · is the dot product. And then, t2( d · d ) + 2t( d · ( e - c ) ) + ( e - c ) · ( e - c ) - r2 = 0 Letting f = e - c t2( d · d ) + 2t( d · f ) + f · f - r2 = 0
所以我们得到: T2 *(d·d) + 2t*(f·d) + (f·f - r2) = 0
求解二次方程:
float a = d.Dot( d ) ;
float b = 2*f.Dot( d ) ;
float c = f.Dot( f ) - r*r ;
float discriminant = b*b-4*a*c;
if( discriminant < 0 )
{
// no intersection
}
else
{
// ray didn't totally miss sphere,
// so there is a solution to
// the equation.
discriminant = sqrt( discriminant );
// either solution may be on or off the ray so need to test both
// t1 is always the smaller value, because BOTH discriminant and
// a are nonnegative.
float t1 = (-b - discriminant)/(2*a);
float t2 = (-b + discriminant)/(2*a);
// 3x HIT cases:
// -o-> --|--> | | --|->
// Impale(t1 hit,t2 hit), Poke(t1 hit,t2>1), ExitWound(t1<0, t2 hit),
// 3x MISS cases:
// -> o o -> | -> |
// FallShort (t1>1,t2>1), Past (t1<0,t2<0), CompletelyInside(t1<0, t2>1)
if( t1 >= 0 && t1 <= 1 )
{
// t1 is the intersection, and it's closer than t2
// (since t1 uses -b - discriminant)
// Impale, Poke
return true ;
}
// here t1 didn't intersect so we are either started
// inside the sphere or completely past it
if( t2 >= 0 && t2 <= 1 )
{
// ExitWound
return true ;
}
// no intn: FallShort, Past, CompletelyInside
return false ;
}
其他回答
也许有另一种方法来解决这个问题,使用坐标系的旋转。
通常,如果一个线段是水平的或垂直的,这意味着平行于x轴或y轴,交点的求解很容易,因为我们已经知道交点的一个坐标,如果有的话。剩下的显然是用圆的方程找到另一个坐标。
受此启发,我们可以利用坐标系旋转,使一个轴的方向与线段的方向重合。
让我们以圆x^2+y^2=1和线段P1-P2为例,P1(-1.5,0.5)和P2(-0.5,-0.5)在x-y系统中。下面的方程提醒你旋转的原理,其中是逆时针方向的角度,x'-y'是旋转后的方程组:
x'=x*cos () + y*sin () y' = - x*sin () + y*cos ()
和反向
X = X ' * cos - y' * sin Y = x' * sin + Y ' * cos
考虑P1-P2方向(用-x表示为45°),我们可以取=45°。将第二个旋转方程转化为x-y系统中的圆方程:x^2+y^2=1,经过简单的运算,我们得到x'-y'系统中的“相同”方程:x'^2+y'^2=1。
利用第一个旋转方程=> P1(-根号(2)/2,根号(2)),P2(-根号(2)/ 2,0),线段端点变成x'-y'系统。
假设交点为p,在x'-y'中,Px = -根号2 /2。使用新的圆方程,我们得到Py = +根号(2)/2。将P转换成原始的x-y系统,最终得到P(-1,0)
为了实现这个数值,我们可以先看看线段的方向:水平,垂直或不垂直。如果它属于前两种情况,很简单。如果是最后一种情况,应用上述算法。
为了判断是否有交集,我们可以将解与端点坐标进行比较,看看它们之间是否有一个根。
我相信只要我们有了它的方程,这个方法也可以应用于其他曲线。唯一的缺点是,我们应该在x'-y'坐标系下解方程,这可能很难。
' VB.NET - Code
Function CheckLineSegmentCircleIntersection(x1 As Double, y1 As Double, x2 As Double, y2 As Double, xc As Double, yc As Double, r As Double) As Boolean
Static xd As Double = 0.0F
Static yd As Double = 0.0F
Static t As Double = 0.0F
Static d As Double = 0.0F
Static dx_2_1 As Double = 0.0F
Static dy_2_1 As Double = 0.0F
dx_2_1 = x2 - x1
dy_2_1 = y2 - y1
t = ((yc - y1) * dy_2_1 + (xc - x1) * dx_2_1) / (dy_2_1 * dy_2_1 + dx_2_1 * dx_2_1)
If 0 <= t And t <= 1 Then
xd = x1 + t * dx_2_1
yd = y1 + t * dy_2_1
d = Math.Sqrt((xd - xc) * (xd - xc) + (yd - yc) * (yd - yc))
Return d <= r
Else
d = Math.Sqrt((xc - x1) * (xc - x1) + (yc - y1) * (yc - y1))
If d <= r Then
Return True
Else
d = Math.Sqrt((xc - x2) * (xc - x2) + (yc - y2) * (yc - y2))
If d <= r Then
Return True
Else
Return False
End If
End If
End If
End Function
采取
E是射线的起点, L是射线的端点, C是你测试的圆心 R是球面的半径
计算: d = L - E(射线方向矢量,从头到尾) f = E - C(从中心球到射线起点的向量)
然后通过…找到交点。 堵塞: P = E + t * d 这是一个参数方程 Px = Ex + tdx Py = Ey + tdy 成 (x - h)2 + (y - k)2 = r2 (h,k) =圆心。
注意:我们在这里将问题简化为2D,我们得到的解决方案也适用于3D
得到:
Expand x2 - 2xh + h2 + y2 - 2yk + k2 - r2 = 0 Plug x = ex + tdx y = ey + tdy ( ex + tdx )2 - 2( ex + tdx )h + h2 + ( ey + tdy )2 - 2( ey + tdy )k + k2 - r2 = 0 Explode ex2 + 2extdx + t2dx2 - 2exh - 2tdxh + h2 + ey2 + 2eytdy + t2dy2 - 2eyk - 2tdyk + k2 - r2 = 0 Group t2( dx2 + dy2 ) + 2t( exdx + eydy - dxh - dyk ) + ex2 + ey2 - 2exh - 2eyk + h2 + k2 - r2 = 0 Finally, t2( d · d ) + 2t( e · d - d · c ) + e · e - 2( e · c ) + c · c - r2 = 0 Where d is the vector d and · is the dot product. And then, t2( d · d ) + 2t( d · ( e - c ) ) + ( e - c ) · ( e - c ) - r2 = 0 Letting f = e - c t2( d · d ) + 2t( d · f ) + f · f - r2 = 0
所以我们得到: T2 *(d·d) + 2t*(f·d) + (f·f - r2) = 0
求解二次方程:
float a = d.Dot( d ) ;
float b = 2*f.Dot( d ) ;
float c = f.Dot( f ) - r*r ;
float discriminant = b*b-4*a*c;
if( discriminant < 0 )
{
// no intersection
}
else
{
// ray didn't totally miss sphere,
// so there is a solution to
// the equation.
discriminant = sqrt( discriminant );
// either solution may be on or off the ray so need to test both
// t1 is always the smaller value, because BOTH discriminant and
// a are nonnegative.
float t1 = (-b - discriminant)/(2*a);
float t2 = (-b + discriminant)/(2*a);
// 3x HIT cases:
// -o-> --|--> | | --|->
// Impale(t1 hit,t2 hit), Poke(t1 hit,t2>1), ExitWound(t1<0, t2 hit),
// 3x MISS cases:
// -> o o -> | -> |
// FallShort (t1>1,t2>1), Past (t1<0,t2<0), CompletelyInside(t1<0, t2>1)
if( t1 >= 0 && t1 <= 1 )
{
// t1 is the intersection, and it's closer than t2
// (since t1 uses -b - discriminant)
// Impale, Poke
return true ;
}
// here t1 didn't intersect so we are either started
// inside the sphere or completely past it
if( t2 >= 0 && t2 <= 1 )
{
// ExitWound
return true ;
}
// no intn: FallShort, Past, CompletelyInside
return false ;
}
另一个在c#(部分圆类)。 经过测试,工作就像一个魅力。
public class Circle : IEquatable<Circle>
{
// ******************************************************************
// The center of a circle
private Point _center;
// The radius of a circle
private double _radius;
// ******************************************************************
/// <summary>
/// Find all intersections (0, 1, 2) of the circle with a line defined by its 2 points.
/// Using: http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/228841/how-do-i-calculate-the-intersections-of-a-straight-line-and-a-circle
/// Note: p is the Center.X and q is Center.Y
/// </summary>
/// <param name="linePoint1"></param>
/// <param name="linePoint2"></param>
/// <returns></returns>
public List<Point> GetIntersections(Point linePoint1, Point linePoint2)
{
List<Point> intersections = new List<Point>();
double dx = linePoint2.X - linePoint1.X;
if (dx.AboutEquals(0)) // Straight vertical line
{
if (linePoint1.X.AboutEquals(Center.X - Radius) || linePoint1.X.AboutEquals(Center.X + Radius))
{
Point pt = new Point(linePoint1.X, Center.Y);
intersections.Add(pt);
}
else if (linePoint1.X > Center.X - Radius && linePoint1.X < Center.X + Radius)
{
double x = linePoint1.X - Center.X;
Point pt = new Point(linePoint1.X, Center.Y + Math.Sqrt(Radius * Radius - (x * x)));
intersections.Add(pt);
pt = new Point(linePoint1.X, Center.Y - Math.Sqrt(Radius * Radius - (x * x)));
intersections.Add(pt);
}
return intersections;
}
// Line function (y = mx + b)
double dy = linePoint2.Y - linePoint1.Y;
double m = dy / dx;
double b = linePoint1.Y - m * linePoint1.X;
double A = m * m + 1;
double B = 2 * (m * b - m * _center.Y - Center.X);
double C = Center.X * Center.X + Center.Y * Center.Y - Radius * Radius - 2 * b * Center.Y + b * b;
double discriminant = B * B - 4 * A * C;
if (discriminant < 0)
{
return intersections; // there is no intersections
}
if (discriminant.AboutEquals(0)) // Tangeante (touch on 1 point only)
{
double x = -B / (2 * A);
double y = m * x + b;
intersections.Add(new Point(x, y));
}
else // Secant (touch on 2 points)
{
double x = (-B + Math.Sqrt(discriminant)) / (2 * A);
double y = m * x + b;
intersections.Add(new Point(x, y));
x = (-B - Math.Sqrt(discriminant)) / (2 * A);
y = m * x + b;
intersections.Add(new Point(x, y));
}
return intersections;
}
// ******************************************************************
// Get the center
[XmlElement("Center")]
public Point Center
{
get { return _center; }
set
{
_center = value;
}
}
// ******************************************************************
// Get the radius
[XmlElement]
public double Radius
{
get { return _radius; }
set { _radius = value; }
}
//// ******************************************************************
//[XmlArrayItemAttribute("DoublePoint")]
//public List<Point> Coordinates
//{
// get { return _coordinates; }
//}
// ******************************************************************
// Construct a circle without any specification
public Circle()
{
_center.X = 0;
_center.Y = 0;
_radius = 0;
}
// ******************************************************************
// Construct a circle without any specification
public Circle(double radius)
{
_center.X = 0;
_center.Y = 0;
_radius = radius;
}
// ******************************************************************
// Construct a circle with the specified circle
public Circle(Circle circle)
{
_center = circle._center;
_radius = circle._radius;
}
// ******************************************************************
// Construct a circle with the specified center and radius
public Circle(Point center, double radius)
{
_center = center;
_radius = radius;
}
// ******************************************************************
// Construct a circle based on one point
public Circle(Point center)
{
_center = center;
_radius = 0;
}
// ******************************************************************
// Construct a circle based on two points
public Circle(Point p1, Point p2)
{
Circle2Points(p1, p2);
}
要求:
using System;
namespace Mathematic
{
public static class DoubleExtension
{
// ******************************************************************
// Base on Hans Passant Answer on:
// http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2411392/double-epsilon-for-equality-greater-than-less-than-less-than-or-equal-to-gre
/// <summary>
/// Compare two double taking in account the double precision potential error.
/// Take care: truncation errors accumulate on calculation. More you do, more you should increase the epsilon.
public static bool AboutEquals(this double value1, double value2)
{
if (double.IsPositiveInfinity(value1))
return double.IsPositiveInfinity(value2);
if (double.IsNegativeInfinity(value1))
return double.IsNegativeInfinity(value2);
if (double.IsNaN(value1))
return double.IsNaN(value2);
double epsilon = Math.Max(Math.Abs(value1), Math.Abs(value2)) * 1E-15;
return Math.Abs(value1 - value2) <= epsilon;
}
// ******************************************************************
// Base on Hans Passant Answer on:
// http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2411392/double-epsilon-for-equality-greater-than-less-than-less-than-or-equal-to-gre
/// <summary>
/// Compare two double taking in account the double precision potential error.
/// Take care: truncation errors accumulate on calculation. More you do, more you should increase the epsilon.
/// You get really better performance when you can determine the contextual epsilon first.
/// </summary>
/// <param name="value1"></param>
/// <param name="value2"></param>
/// <param name="precalculatedContextualEpsilon"></param>
/// <returns></returns>
public static bool AboutEquals(this double value1, double value2, double precalculatedContextualEpsilon)
{
if (double.IsPositiveInfinity(value1))
return double.IsPositiveInfinity(value2);
if (double.IsNegativeInfinity(value1))
return double.IsNegativeInfinity(value2);
if (double.IsNaN(value1))
return double.IsNaN(value2);
return Math.Abs(value1 - value2) <= precalculatedContextualEpsilon;
}
// ******************************************************************
public static double GetContextualEpsilon(this double biggestPossibleContextualValue)
{
return biggestPossibleContextualValue * 1E-15;
}
// ******************************************************************
/// <summary>
/// Mathlab equivalent
/// </summary>
/// <param name="dividend"></param>
/// <param name="divisor"></param>
/// <returns></returns>
public static double Mod(this double dividend, double divisor)
{
return dividend - System.Math.Floor(dividend / divisor) * divisor;
}
// ******************************************************************
}
}
只是这个线程的一个补充… 下面是pahlevan发布的代码版本,但针对c# /XNA,并做了一些整理:
/// <summary>
/// Intersects a line and a circle.
/// </summary>
/// <param name="location">the location of the circle</param>
/// <param name="radius">the radius of the circle</param>
/// <param name="lineFrom">the starting point of the line</param>
/// <param name="lineTo">the ending point of the line</param>
/// <returns>true if the line and circle intersect each other</returns>
public static bool IntersectLineCircle(Vector2 location, float radius, Vector2 lineFrom, Vector2 lineTo)
{
float ab2, acab, h2;
Vector2 ac = location - lineFrom;
Vector2 ab = lineTo - lineFrom;
Vector2.Dot(ref ab, ref ab, out ab2);
Vector2.Dot(ref ac, ref ab, out acab);
float t = acab / ab2;
if (t < 0)
t = 0;
else if (t > 1)
t = 1;
Vector2 h = ((ab * t) + lineFrom) - location;
Vector2.Dot(ref h, ref h, out h2);
return (h2 <= (radius * radius));
}