清楚地区分使用工厂或工厂方法背后的思想是很重要的。 两者都旨在解决互斥的不同类型的对象创建问题。

让我们具体谈谈“工厂方法”:

首先，当您正在开发库或api时，这些库或api将用于进一步的应用程序开发，那么工厂方法是创建模式的最佳选择之一。原因;我们知道什么时候创建一个所需功能的对象，但对象的类型仍未确定，或者将根据传递的动态参数来决定。

Now the point is, approximately same can be achieved by using factory pattern itself but one huge drawback will introduce into the system if factory pattern will be used for above highlighted problem, it is that your logic of crating different objects(sub classes objects) will be specific to some business condition so in future when you need to extend your library's functionality for other platforms(In more technically, you need to add more sub classes of basic interface or abstract class so factory will return those objects also in addition to existing one based on some dynamic parameters) then every time you need to change(extend) the logic of factory class which will be costly operation and not good from design perspective. On the other side, if "factory method" pattern will be used to perform the same thing then you just need to create additional functionality(sub classes) and get it registered dynamically by injection which doesn't require changes in your base code.

interface Deliverable 
{
    /*********/
}

abstract class DefaultProducer 
{

    public void taskToBeDone() 
    {   
        Deliverable deliverable = factoryMethodPattern();
    }
    protected abstract Deliverable factoryMethodPattern();
}

class SpecificDeliverable implements Deliverable 
{
 /***SPECIFIC TASK CAN BE WRITTEN HERE***/
}

class SpecificProducer extends DefaultProducer 
{
    protected Deliverable factoryMethodPattern() 
    {
        return new SpecificDeliverable();
    }
}

public class MasterApplicationProgram 
{
    public static void main(String arg[]) 
    {
        DefaultProducer defaultProducer = new SpecificProducer();
        defaultProducer.taskToBeDone();
    }
}

清楚地区分使用工厂或工厂方法背后的思想是很重要的。 两者都旨在解决互斥的不同类型的对象创建问题。

让我们具体谈谈“工厂方法”:

首先，当您正在开发库或api时，这些库或api将用于进一步的应用程序开发，那么工厂方法是创建模式的最佳选择之一。原因;我们知道什么时候创建一个所需功能的对象，但对象的类型仍未确定，或者将根据传递的动态参数来决定。

Now the point is, approximately same can be achieved by using factory pattern itself but one huge drawback will introduce into the system if factory pattern will be used for above highlighted problem, it is that your logic of crating different objects(sub classes objects) will be specific to some business condition so in future when you need to extend your library's functionality for other platforms(In more technically, you need to add more sub classes of basic interface or abstract class so factory will return those objects also in addition to existing one based on some dynamic parameters) then every time you need to change(extend) the logic of factory class which will be costly operation and not good from design perspective. On the other side, if "factory method" pattern will be used to perform the same thing then you just need to create additional functionality(sub classes) and get it registered dynamically by injection which doesn't require changes in your base code.

interface Deliverable 
{
    /*********/
}

abstract class DefaultProducer 
{

    public void taskToBeDone() 
    {   
        Deliverable deliverable = factoryMethodPattern();
    }
    protected abstract Deliverable factoryMethodPattern();
}

class SpecificDeliverable implements Deliverable 
{
 /***SPECIFIC TASK CAN BE WRITTEN HERE***/
}

class SpecificProducer extends DefaultProducer 
{
    protected Deliverable factoryMethodPattern() 
    {
        return new SpecificDeliverable();
    }
}

public class MasterApplicationProgram 
{
    public static void main(String arg[]) 
    {
        DefaultProducer defaultProducer = new SpecificProducer();
        defaultProducer.taskToBeDone();
    }
}

UML从

Product:它定义Factory方法创建的对象的接口。

ConcreteProduct:实现Product接口

创建者:声明Factory方法

ConcreateCreator:实现Factory方法以返回ConcreteProduct的实例

问题陈述:使用定义游戏界面的工厂方法创建游戏工厂。

代码片段:

import java.util.HashMap;


/* Product interface as per UML diagram */
interface Game{
    /* createGame is a complex method, which executes a sequence of game steps */
    public void createGame();
}

/* ConcreteProduct implementation as per UML diagram */
class Chess implements Game{
    public Chess(){

    }
    public void createGame(){
        System.out.println("---------------------------------------");
        System.out.println("Create Chess game");
        System.out.println("Opponents:2");
        System.out.println("Define 64 blocks");
        System.out.println("Place 16 pieces for White opponent");
        System.out.println("Place 16 pieces for Black opponent");
        System.out.println("Start Chess game");
        System.out.println("---------------------------------------");
    }
}
class Checkers implements Game{
    public Checkers(){

    }
    public void createGame(){
        System.out.println("---------------------------------------");
        System.out.println("Create Checkers game");
        System.out.println("Opponents:2 or 3 or 4 or 6");
        System.out.println("For each opponent, place 10 coins");
        System.out.println("Start Checkers game");
        System.out.println("---------------------------------------");
    }
}
class Ludo implements Game{
    public Ludo(){

    }
    public void createGame(){
        System.out.println("---------------------------------------");
        System.out.println("Create Ludo game");
        System.out.println("Opponents:2 or 3 or 4");
        System.out.println("For each opponent, place 4 coins");
        System.out.println("Create two dices with numbers from 1-6");
        System.out.println("Start Ludo game");
        System.out.println("---------------------------------------");
    }
}

/* Creator interface as per UML diagram */
interface IGameFactory {
    public Game getGame(String gameName);
}

/* ConcreteCreator implementation as per UML diagram */
class GameFactory implements IGameFactory {

     HashMap<String,Game> games = new HashMap<String,Game>();
    /*  
        Since Game Creation is complex process, we don't want to create game using new operator every time.
        Instead we create Game only once and store it in Factory. When client request a specific game, 
        Game object is returned from Factory instead of creating new Game on the fly, which is time consuming
    */

    public GameFactory(){

        games.put(Chess.class.getName(),new Chess());
        games.put(Checkers.class.getName(),new Checkers());
        games.put(Ludo.class.getName(),new Ludo());        
    }
    public Game getGame(String gameName){
        return games.get(gameName);
    }
}

public class NonStaticFactoryDemo{
    public static void main(String args[]){
        if ( args.length < 1){
            System.out.println("Usage: java FactoryDemo gameName");
            return;
        }

        GameFactory factory = new GameFactory();
        Game game = factory.getGame(args[0]);
        if ( game != null ){                    
            game.createGame();
            System.out.println("Game="+game.getClass().getName());
        }else{
            System.out.println(args[0]+  " Game does not exists in factory");
        }           
    }
}

输出:

java NonStaticFactoryDemo Chess
---------------------------------------
Create Chess game
Opponents:2
Define 64 blocks
Place 16 pieces for White opponent
Place 16 pieces for Black opponent
Start Chess game
---------------------------------------
Game=Chess

这个例子通过实现FactoryMethod展示了一个Factory类。

Game is the interface for all type of games. It defines complex method: createGame() Chess, Ludo, Checkers are different variants of games, which provide implementation to createGame() public Game getGame(String gameName) is FactoryMethod in IGameFactory class GameFactory pre-creates different type of games in constructor. It implements IGameFactory factory method. game Name is passed as command line argument to NotStaticFactoryDemo getGame in GameFactory accepts a game name and returns corresponding Game object.

工厂:

创建对象而不向客户端公开实例化逻辑。

FactoryMethod

定义一个用于创建对象的接口，但是让子类来决定实例化哪个类。Factory方法允许类延迟实例化到子类

用例:

何时使用:客户端不知道在运行时需要创建什么具体的类，而只是想获得一个可以完成这项工作的类。

考虑一个场景，当您必须设计Order和Customer类时。为了简单和初始需求，您不需要Order类的factory，并使用许多“new Order()”语句填充应用程序。一切都很顺利。

现在出现了一个新的需求，即Order对象不能在没有客户关联的情况下实例化(新的依赖项)。现在你有以下考虑。

1-你创建了只对新实现有效的构造函数重载。(不可接受)。 2-您更改Order()签名并更改每个调用。(这不是一个很好的练习，而且真的很痛苦)。

相反，如果你已经为Order Class创建了一个工厂，你只需要修改一行代码就可以了。我建议几乎所有聚合关联都使用Factory类。希望这能有所帮助。

我认为这取决于你想要给你的代码带来的松耦合程度。

工厂方法解耦得很好，但是工厂类不行。

换句话说，使用工厂方法比使用简单的工厂(称为工厂类)更容易更改内容。

看看这个例子:https://connected2know.com/programming/java-factory-pattern/。现在，想象一下你想要带来一个新的动物。在Factory类中，您需要更改Factory，但在Factory方法中，不需要，您只需要添加一个新的子类。

工厂方法应该被认为是构造函数的替代品——尤其是在构造函数表达能力不够的时候。

class Foo{
  public Foo(bool withBar);
}

表现力不如:

class Foo{
  public static Foo withBar();
  public static Foo withoutBar();
}

当你需要一个复杂的过程来构造对象时，当构造需要一个你不想要的实际类的依赖关系时，当你需要构造不同的对象时，工厂类是有用的。