通过阅读Microsoft文档,我知道IDisposable接口的“主要”用途是清理非托管资源。
对我来说,“非托管”意味着数据库连接、套接字、窗口句柄等。但是,我看到过一些代码,其中使用Dispose()方法来释放托管资源,这对我来说似乎是多余的,因为垃圾收集器应该为你负责。
例如:
public class MyCollection : IDisposable
{
private List<String> _theList = new List<String>();
private Dictionary<String, Point> _theDict = new Dictionary<String, Point>();
// Die, clear it up! (free unmanaged resources)
public void Dispose()
{
_theList.clear();
_theDict.clear();
_theList = null;
_theDict = null;
}
}
我的问题是,这是否会使MyCollection使用的垃圾收集器释放内存比正常情况更快?
编辑:到目前为止,人们已经发布了一些使用IDisposable清理非托管资源(如数据库连接和位图)的好例子。但假设上述代码中的_theList包含一百万个字符串,并且您希望现在释放内存,而不是等待垃圾收集器。上面的代码能做到这一点吗?
给定的代码示例不是IDisposable用法的好示例。字典清除通常不应转到Dispose方法。字典项在超出范围时将被清除和处理。需要IDisposable实现来释放一些内存/处理程序,即使它们超出范围也不会释放/释放。
下面的示例显示了IDisposable模式的一个很好的示例,其中包含一些代码和注释。
public class DisposeExample
{
// A base class that implements IDisposable.
// By implementing IDisposable, you are announcing that
// instances of this type allocate scarce resources.
public class MyResource: IDisposable
{
// Pointer to an external unmanaged resource.
private IntPtr handle;
// Other managed resource this class uses.
private Component component = new Component();
// Track whether Dispose has been called.
private bool disposed = false;
// The class constructor.
public MyResource(IntPtr handle)
{
this.handle = handle;
}
// Implement IDisposable.
// Do not make this method virtual.
// A derived class should not be able to override this method.
public void Dispose()
{
Dispose(true);
// This object will be cleaned up by the Dispose method.
// Therefore, you should call GC.SupressFinalize to
// take this object off the finalization queue
// and prevent finalization code for this object
// from executing a second time.
GC.SuppressFinalize(this);
}
// Dispose(bool disposing) executes in two distinct scenarios.
// If disposing equals true, the method has been called directly
// or indirectly by a user's code. Managed and unmanaged resources
// can be disposed.
// If disposing equals false, the method has been called by the
// runtime from inside the finalizer and you should not reference
// other objects. Only unmanaged resources can be disposed.
protected virtual void Dispose(bool disposing)
{
// Check to see if Dispose has already been called.
if(!this.disposed)
{
// If disposing equals true, dispose all managed
// and unmanaged resources.
if(disposing)
{
// Dispose managed resources.
component.Dispose();
}
// Call the appropriate methods to clean up
// unmanaged resources here.
// If disposing is false,
// only the following code is executed.
CloseHandle(handle);
handle = IntPtr.Zero;
// Note disposing has been done.
disposed = true;
}
}
// Use interop to call the method necessary
// to clean up the unmanaged resource.
[System.Runtime.InteropServices.DllImport("Kernel32")]
private extern static Boolean CloseHandle(IntPtr handle);
// Use C# destructor syntax for finalization code.
// This destructor will run only if the Dispose method
// does not get called.
// It gives your base class the opportunity to finalize.
// Do not provide destructors in types derived from this class.
~MyResource()
{
// Do not re-create Dispose clean-up code here.
// Calling Dispose(false) is optimal in terms of
// readability and maintainability.
Dispose(false);
}
}
public static void Main()
{
// Insert code here to create
// and use the MyResource object.
}
}
是的,这段代码完全是多余和不必要的,它不会让垃圾回收器做任何它不会做的事情(即,一旦MyCollection的实例超出范围),尤其是.Clear()调用。
对编辑的回答:有点。如果我这样做:
public void WasteMemory()
{
var instance = new MyCollection(); // this one has no Dispose() method
instance.FillItWithAMillionStrings();
}
// 1 million strings are in memory, but marked for reclamation by the GC
在内存管理方面,它的功能与此相同:
public void WasteMemory()
{
var instance = new MyCollection(); // this one has your Dispose()
instance.FillItWithAMillionStrings();
instance.Dispose();
}
// 1 million strings are in memory, but marked for reclamation by the GC
如果您真的真的需要立即释放内存,请调用GC.Collect()。内存将在需要时释放。