你见过的最糟糕的安全漏洞是什么?为了保护罪犯,限制细节可能是个好主意。
不管怎样,这里有一个关于如果你发现了安全漏洞该怎么办的问题,还有一个关于如果公司(似乎)没有回应该怎么办的问题。
你见过的最糟糕的安全漏洞是什么?为了保护罪犯,限制细节可能是个好主意。
不管怎样,这里有一个关于如果你发现了安全漏洞该怎么办的问题,还有一个关于如果公司(似乎)没有回应该怎么办的问题。
当前回答
http://apache.org/.svn/entries
其他回答
我之前至少有一个同事可能符合这个条件。
1-800 dominos will give unlisted address's related to any target phone number. When prompted if you are calling about the phone number you called from select no. The system will prompt you for a new phone number, the system will then read back to you the name and address that's associated to this phone number. Enter in your target's phone number and you now have their name and address. This is pretty common with automated ordering systems and if dominos has fixed this there are literally hundreds more.
我曾经做过一份工作,其中有一个用Java代码编写的安全层,用于检查用户是否有权编辑DB表列。这是函数的样子:
public boolean canEdit(User user, DBColumn column) {
if(true) {
return true;
} else {
return false;
}
}
谁能忘记Windows 98的经典安全漏洞呢?
复制密码文本*********并将其粘贴到文字处理器中,就会显示几乎任何东西的密码。
In the 1970's Stanford had IBM 2741 hardcopy terminals spread around campus networked to an IBM 360/67. Account passwords were three characters. During logon, the password prompt would overprint a three-position blob of about nine random uppercase characters, so the subsequently-typed password would supposedly be masked by the blob. However, everyone typed their passwords in lowercase, which were trivial to discern against the uppercase background blob. That meant you could usually walk up to any terminal, peruse the hardcopy typically left behind by the previous user, and easily logon with their account and password.