你见过的最糟糕的安全漏洞是什么?为了保护罪犯,限制细节可能是个好主意。

不管怎样,这里有一个关于如果你发现了安全漏洞该怎么办的问题,还有一个关于如果公司(似乎)没有回应该怎么办的问题。


当前回答

In the 1970's Stanford had IBM 2741 hardcopy terminals spread around campus networked to an IBM 360/67. Account passwords were three characters. During logon, the password prompt would overprint a three-position blob of about nine random uppercase characters, so the subsequently-typed password would supposedly be masked by the blob. However, everyone typed their passwords in lowercase, which were trivial to discern against the uppercase background blob. That meant you could usually walk up to any terminal, peruse the hardcopy typically left behind by the previous user, and easily logon with their account and password.

其他回答

在因特网上发布你的ELMAH错误日志怎么样?

不是最糟糕的,但很好笑的一个是Android操作系统重启的bug。当用户使用G1手机时,他们可以在手机的任何地方输入“重启”(比如:短信或电子邮件),手机就会重新启动。

简单地说

exec unchecked_parameter_from_the_web

在Python中解析用户给出的字典字面量。那真的很可怕。

1-800 dominos will give unlisted address's related to any target phone number. When prompted if you are calling about the phone number you called from select no. The system will prompt you for a new phone number, the system will then read back to you the name and address that's associated to this phone number. Enter in your target's phone number and you now have their name and address. This is pretty common with automated ordering systems and if dominos has fixed this there are literally hundreds more.

login.jsp?type=user&redirct=/home.jsp&userid=12345&username=username&password=mypassword

这发生在一个非常大的网站上。当我看到这个的时候,我惊呆了。