我的应用程序有一个特定的功能,只能在根可用的设备上工作。与其让这个特性在使用时失败(然后向用户显示适当的错误消息),我更希望能够先静默地检查根目录是否可用,如果不可用,则首先隐藏相应的选项。
有办法做到这一点吗?
我的应用程序有一个特定的功能,只能在根可用的设备上工作。与其让这个特性在使用时失败(然后向用户显示适当的错误消息),我更希望能够先静默地检查根目录是否可用,如果不可用,则首先隐藏相应的选项。
有办法做到这一点吗?
当前回答
使用谷歌SafetyNet认证API,您可以轻松检查您的设备是否已根:
Add dependency in build.gradle(:app) implementation 'com.google.android.gms:play-services-safetynet:17.0.0' Get Api key and enable Android Device Verification API using link public static void sendSafetyNetRequest(Activity context) { if(GoogleApiAvailability.getInstance().isGooglePlayServicesAvailable(context, 13000000) == ConnectionResult.SUCCESS) { Log.e(TAG, "The SafetyNet Attestation API is available"); // TODO(developer): Change the nonce generation to include your own, used once value, // ideally from your remote server. String nonceData = "Safety Net Sample: " + System.currentTimeMillis(); ByteArrayOutputStream byteStream = new ByteArrayOutputStream(); Random mRandom = new SecureRandom(); byte[] bytes = new byte[24]; mRandom.nextBytes(bytes); try { byteStream.write(bytes); byteStream.write(nonceData.getBytes()); } catch (IOException e) { e.printStackTrace(); } byte[] nonce = byteStream.toByteArray(); SafetyNetClient client = SafetyNet.getClient(context); Task<SafetyNetApi.AttestationResponse> task = client.attest(nonce, API_KEY_FROM_STEP_2_LINK); task.addOnSuccessListener(context, attestationResponse -> { /* TODO(developer): Forward this result to your server together with the nonce for verification. You can also parse the JwsResult locally to confirm that the API returned a response by checking for an 'error' field first and before retrying the request with an exponential backoff. NOTE: Do NOT rely on a local, client-side only check for security, you must verify the response on a remote server! */ String jwsResult = attestationResponse.getJwsResult(); Log.e(TAG, "Success! SafetyNet result:\n" + jwsResult + "\n"); if (jwsResult == null) { Log.e(TAG, "jwsResult Null"); } final String[] jwtParts = jwsResult.split("\\."); if (jwtParts.length == 3) { String decodedPayload = new String(Base64.decode(jwtParts[1], Base64.DEFAULT)); Log.e(TAG, "decodedPayload : " + decodedPayload); } }); task.addOnFailureListener(context, e -> { // An error occurred while communicating with the service. String mResult = null; if (e instanceof ApiException) { // An error with the Google Play Services API contains some additional details. ApiException apiException = (ApiException) e; Util.showLog(TAG, "Error: " + CommonStatusCodes.getStatusCodeString(apiException.getStatusCode()) + ": " + apiException.getStatusMessage()); } else { // A different, unknown type of error occurred. Log.e(TAG, "ERROR! " + e.getMessage()); } }); } else { Log.e(TAG, "Prompt user to update Google Play services."; } } ` Check your logs for decodedPayload if ctsProfileMatch and basicIntegrity both are false it means your device is rooted . The Attestation API returns a JWS response which looks like:
{"nonce": "6pLrr9zWyl6TNzj+kpbR4LZcfPY3U2FmZXR5IE5ldCBTYW1wbGU6IDE2MTQ2NzkwMTIzNjc=", " timestamms ": 9860437986543, "apkPackageName": "你的包名将显示在这里","ctsProfileMatch": true, "apkDigestSha256": ["base64编码,用于签名请求应用程序的证书的SHA-256哈希值"],"basicIntegrity": true, "evaluationType": "BASIC"}
欲了解更多信息,请查看此链接。
其他回答
下面是一个类,它将以三种方式之一检查Root。
/** @author Kevin Kowalewski */
public class RootUtil {
public static boolean isDeviceRooted() {
return checkRootMethod1() || checkRootMethod2() || checkRootMethod3();
}
private static boolean checkRootMethod1() {
String buildTags = android.os.Build.TAGS;
return buildTags != null && buildTags.contains("test-keys");
}
private static boolean checkRootMethod2() {
String[] paths = { "/system/app/Superuser.apk", "/sbin/su", "/system/bin/su", "/system/xbin/su", "/data/local/xbin/su", "/data/local/bin/su", "/system/sd/xbin/su",
"/system/bin/failsafe/su", "/data/local/su", "/su/bin/su"};
for (String path : paths) {
if (new File(path).exists()) return true;
}
return false;
}
private static boolean checkRootMethod3() {
Process process = null;
try {
process = Runtime.getRuntime().exec(new String[] { "/system/xbin/which", "su" });
BufferedReader in = new BufferedReader(new InputStreamReader(process.getInputStream()));
if (in.readLine() != null) return true;
return false;
} catch (Throwable t) {
return false;
} finally {
if (process != null) process.destroy();
}
}
}
如果你已经在使用Fabric/Firebase Crashlytics,你可以打电话
CommonUtils.isRooted(context)
这是该方法的当前实现:
public static boolean isRooted(Context context) {
boolean isEmulator = isEmulator(context);
String buildTags = Build.TAGS;
if (!isEmulator && buildTags != null && buildTags.contains("test-keys")) {
return true;
} else {
File file = new File("/system/app/Superuser.apk");
if (file.exists()) {
return true;
} else {
file = new File("/system/xbin/su");
return !isEmulator && file.exists();
}
}
}
public static boolean isEmulator(Context context) {
String androidId = Secure.getString(context.getContentResolver(), "android_id");
return "sdk".equals(Build.PRODUCT) || "google_sdk".equals(Build.PRODUCT) || androidId == null;
}
一些用于设置系统属性ro的修改版本。Modversion用于此目的。事情似乎已经发生了变化;我几个月前在TheDude上的构建是这样的:
cmb@apollo:~$ adb -d shell getprop |grep build
[ro.build.id]: [CUPCAKE]
[ro.build.display.id]: [htc_dream-eng 1.5 CUPCAKE eng.TheDudeAbides.20090427.235325 test-keys]
[ro.build.version.incremental]: [eng.TheDude.2009027.235325]
[ro.build.version.sdk]: [3]
[ro.build.version.release]: [1.5]
[ro.build.date]: [Mon Apr 20 01:42:32 CDT 2009]
[ro.build.date.utc]: [1240209752]
[ro.build.type]: [eng]
[ro.build.user]: [TheDude]
[ro.build.host]: [ender]
[ro.build.tags]: [test-keys]
[ro.build.product]: [dream]
[ro.build.description]: [kila-user 1.1 PLAT-RC33 126986 ota-rel-keys,release-keys]
[ro.build.fingerprint]: [tmobile/kila/dream/trout:1.1/PLAT-RC33/126986:user/ota-rel-keys,release-keys]
[ro.build.changelist]: [17615# end build properties]
另一方面,来自1.5 SDK的模拟器,运行1.5镜像,也有根,可能类似于Android Dev Phone 1(你可能想要允许),并有这个:
cmb@apollo:~$ adb -e shell getprop |grep build
[ro.build.id]: [CUPCAKE]
[ro.build.display.id]: [sdk-eng 1.5 CUPCAKE 148875 test-keys]
[ro.build.version.incremental]: [148875]
[ro.build.version.sdk]: [3]
[ro.build.version.release]: [1.5]
[ro.build.date]: [Thu May 14 18:09:10 PDT 2009]
[ro.build.date.utc]: [1242349750]
[ro.build.type]: [eng]
[ro.build.user]: [android-build]
[ro.build.host]: [undroid16.mtv.corp.google.com]
[ro.build.tags]: [test-keys]
[ro.build.product]: [generic]
[ro.build.description]: [sdk-eng 1.5 CUPCAKE 148875 test-keys]
[ro.build.fingerprint]: [generic/sdk/generic/:1.5/CUPCAKE/148875:eng/test-keys]
至于零售构建,我手头没有,但在site:xda developers.com下的各种搜索提供了大量信息。这是荷兰的G1, ro。build。tags没有test-key,我认为这可能是最可靠的属性。
在rootbox中使用我的库非常简单。检查所需的代码如下:
//Pass true to <Shell>.start(...) call to run as superuser
Shell shell = null;
try {
shell = Shell.start(true);
} catch (IOException exception) {
exception.printStackTrace();
}
if (shell == null)
// We failed to execute su binary
return;
if (shell.isRoot()) {
// Verified running as uid 0 (root), can continue with commands
...
} else
throw Exception("Unable to gain root access. Make sure you pressed Allow/Grant in superuser prompt.");
另外两个方法,如果你想检查一个设备在你的应用程序中是否具有根功能:
检查是否存在“su”二进制文件:从Runtime.getRuntime().exec()运行"which su" 在/system/app/ SuperUser.apk目录下查找SuperUser.apk