使用谷歌SafetyNet认证API，您可以轻松检查您的设备是否已根:

Add dependency in build.gradle(:app) implementation 'com.google.android.gms:play-services-safetynet:17.0.0' Get Api key and enable Android Device Verification API using link public static void sendSafetyNetRequest(Activity context) { if(GoogleApiAvailability.getInstance().isGooglePlayServicesAvailable(context, 13000000) == ConnectionResult.SUCCESS) { Log.e(TAG, "The SafetyNet Attestation API is available"); // TODO(developer): Change the nonce generation to include your own, used once value, // ideally from your remote server. String nonceData = "Safety Net Sample: " + System.currentTimeMillis(); ByteArrayOutputStream byteStream = new ByteArrayOutputStream(); Random mRandom = new SecureRandom(); byte[] bytes = new byte[24]; mRandom.nextBytes(bytes); try { byteStream.write(bytes); byteStream.write(nonceData.getBytes()); } catch (IOException e) { e.printStackTrace(); } byte[] nonce = byteStream.toByteArray(); SafetyNetClient client = SafetyNet.getClient(context); Task<SafetyNetApi.AttestationResponse> task = client.attest(nonce, API_KEY_FROM_STEP_2_LINK); task.addOnSuccessListener(context, attestationResponse -> { /* TODO(developer): Forward this result to your server together with the nonce for verification. You can also parse the JwsResult locally to confirm that the API returned a response by checking for an 'error' field first and before retrying the request with an exponential backoff. NOTE: Do NOT rely on a local, client-side only check for security, you must verify the response on a remote server! */ String jwsResult = attestationResponse.getJwsResult(); Log.e(TAG, "Success! SafetyNet result:\n" + jwsResult + "\n"); if (jwsResult == null) { Log.e(TAG, "jwsResult Null"); } final String[] jwtParts = jwsResult.split("\\."); if (jwtParts.length == 3) { String decodedPayload = new String(Base64.decode(jwtParts[1], Base64.DEFAULT)); Log.e(TAG, "decodedPayload : " + decodedPayload); } }); task.addOnFailureListener(context, e -> { // An error occurred while communicating with the service. String mResult = null; if (e instanceof ApiException) { // An error with the Google Play Services API contains some additional details. ApiException apiException = (ApiException) e; Util.showLog(TAG, "Error: " + CommonStatusCodes.getStatusCodeString(apiException.getStatusCode()) + ": " + apiException.getStatusMessage()); } else { // A different, unknown type of error occurred. Log.e(TAG, "ERROR! " + e.getMessage()); } }); } else { Log.e(TAG, "Prompt user to update Google Play services."; } } ` Check your logs for decodedPayload if ctsProfileMatch and basicIntegrity both are false it means your device is rooted . The Attestation API returns a JWS response which looks like:

{"nonce": "6pLrr9zWyl6TNzj+kpbR4LZcfPY3U2FmZXR5IE5ldCBTYW1wbGU6IDE2MTQ2NzkwMTIzNjc="， " timestamms ": 9860437986543， "apkPackageName": "你的包名将显示在这里"，"ctsProfileMatch": true， "apkDigestSha256": ["base64编码，用于签名请求应用程序的证书的SHA-256哈希值"]，"basicIntegrity": true， "evaluationType": "BASIC"}

欲了解更多信息，请查看此链接。

一些用于设置系统属性ro的修改版本。Modversion用于此目的。事情似乎已经发生了变化;我几个月前在TheDude上的构建是这样的:

cmb@apollo:~$ adb -d shell getprop |grep build
[ro.build.id]: [CUPCAKE]
[ro.build.display.id]: [htc_dream-eng 1.5 CUPCAKE eng.TheDudeAbides.20090427.235325 test-keys]
[ro.build.version.incremental]: [eng.TheDude.2009027.235325]
[ro.build.version.sdk]: [3]
[ro.build.version.release]: [1.5]
[ro.build.date]: [Mon Apr 20 01:42:32 CDT 2009]
[ro.build.date.utc]: [1240209752]
[ro.build.type]: [eng]
[ro.build.user]: [TheDude]
[ro.build.host]: [ender]
[ro.build.tags]: [test-keys]
[ro.build.product]: [dream]
[ro.build.description]: [kila-user 1.1 PLAT-RC33 126986 ota-rel-keys,release-keys]
[ro.build.fingerprint]: [tmobile/kila/dream/trout:1.1/PLAT-RC33/126986:user/ota-rel-keys,release-keys]
[ro.build.changelist]: [17615# end build properties]

另一方面，来自1.5 SDK的模拟器，运行1.5镜像，也有根，可能类似于Android Dev Phone 1(你可能想要允许)，并有这个:

cmb@apollo:~$ adb -e shell getprop |grep build
[ro.build.id]: [CUPCAKE]
[ro.build.display.id]: [sdk-eng 1.5 CUPCAKE 148875 test-keys]
[ro.build.version.incremental]: [148875]
[ro.build.version.sdk]: [3]
[ro.build.version.release]: [1.5]
[ro.build.date]: [Thu May 14 18:09:10 PDT 2009]
[ro.build.date.utc]: [1242349750]
[ro.build.type]: [eng]
[ro.build.user]: [android-build]
[ro.build.host]: [undroid16.mtv.corp.google.com]
[ro.build.tags]: [test-keys]
[ro.build.product]: [generic]
[ro.build.description]: [sdk-eng 1.5 CUPCAKE 148875 test-keys]
[ro.build.fingerprint]: [generic/sdk/generic/:1.5/CUPCAKE/148875:eng/test-keys]

至于零售构建，我手头没有，但在site:xda developers.com下的各种搜索提供了大量信息。这是荷兰的G1, ro。build。tags没有test-key，我认为这可能是最可靠的属性。

在我的应用程序中，我通过执行“su”命令检查设备是否根。但是今天我删除了这部分代码。为什么?

因为我的应用程序成了内存杀手。怎么做?让我告诉你我的故事。

There were some complaints that my application was slowing down devices(Of course I thought that can not be true). I tried to figure out why. So I used MAT to get heap dumps and analyze, and everything seemed perfect. But after relaunching my app many times I realized that device is really getting slower and stopping my application didn't make it faster (unless I restart device). I analyzed dump files again while device is very slow. But everything was still perfect for dump file. Then I did what must be done at first. I listed processes.

$ adb shell ps

使震惊;我的应用程序有许多进程(应用程序的进程标签在manifest上)。有些是僵尸，有些不是。

对于一个只有一个Activity并只执行“su”命令的示例应用程序，我意识到在每次启动应用程序时都会创建一个僵尸进程。起初，这些僵尸进程分配0KB，但后来发生了一些事情，僵尸进程与我的应用程序的主进程占用了几乎相同的kb，它们成为了标准进程。

在bugs.sun.com: http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=6474073上有一个关于相同问题的错误报告，这解释了如果命令没有找到，将使用exec()方法创建僵尸。但我仍然不明白它们为什么以及如何成为标准流程并保持重要的kb。(这并不是一直都在发生)

你可以尝试如果你想下面的代码示例;

String commandToExecute = "su";
executeShellCommand(commandToExecute);

简单的命令执行方法;

private boolean executeShellCommand(String command){
    Process process = null;            
    try{
        process = Runtime.getRuntime().exec(command);
        return true;
    } catch (Exception e) {
        return false;
    } finally{
        if(process != null){
            try{
                process.destroy();
            }catch (Exception e) {
            }
        }
    }
}

总结:总结;我没有建议你确定设备是否扎根。但如果我是你，我不会使用Runtime.getRuntime().exec()。

顺便说一下;RootTools.isRootAvailable()也会引起同样的问题。

根据这里的一些答案，我合并了它们，并添加了一个检查是否安装了一些已知的根管理器应用程序:

fun isProbablyRooted(context: Context, alsoIncludeCheckingRootManagerApp: Boolean = false): Boolean {
    return hasRootManagerSystemApp(context) || (alsoIncludeCheckingRootManagerApp && hasRootManagerSystemApp(context))
}

fun hasRootManagerSystemApp(context: Context): Boolean {
    val rootAppsPackageNames = arrayOf("com.topjohnwu.magisk", "eu.chainfire.supersu", "com.koushikdutta.superuser", "com.noshufou.android.su", "me.phh.superuser")
    rootAppsPackageNames.forEach { rootAppPackageName ->
        try {
            context.packageManager.getApplicationInfo(rootAppPackageName, 0)
            return true
        } catch (e: Exception) {
        }
    }
    return false
}

fun hasSuBinary(): Boolean {
    return try {
        findBinary("su")
    } catch (e: Exception) {
        e.printStackTrace()
        false
    }
}

private fun findBinary(binaryName: String): Boolean {
    val paths = System.getenv("PATH")
    if (!paths.isNullOrBlank()) {
        val systemPlaces: List<String> = paths.split(":")
        return systemPlaces.firstOrNull { File(it, binaryName).exists() } != null
    }
    val places = arrayOf("/sbin/", "/system/bin/", "/system/xbin/", "/data/local/xbin/", "/data/local/bin/",
            "/system/sd/xbin/", "/system/bin/failsafe/", "/data/local/")
    return places.firstOrNull { File(it, binaryName).exists() } != null
}

清单:

<queries>
    <package android:name="com.topjohnwu.magisk" />
    <package android:name="eu.chainfire.supersu" />
    <package android:name="com.koushikdutta.superuser" />
    <package android:name="com.noshufou.android.su" />
    <package android:name="me.phh.superuser" />
</queries>

当然，这仍然是一个猜测，就像所有其他解一样。 例如，用户可以安装Magisk，而无需对设备进行root操作。

使用c++和ndk是最好的方法来检测根，即使用户使用的应用程序隐藏了他的根，如RootCloak。我用RootCloak测试了这段代码，即使用户试图隐藏它，我也能够检测到根。 所以你的cpp文件是这样的:

#include <jni.h>
#include <string>


/**
 *
 * function that checks for the su binary files and operates even if 
 * root cloak is installed
 * @return integer 1: device is rooted, 0: device is not 
 *rooted
*/
extern "C"
JNIEXPORT int JNICALL


Java_com_example_user_root_1native_rootFunction(JNIEnv *env,jobject thiz){
const char *paths[] ={"/system/app/Superuser.apk", "/sbin/su", "/system/bin/su",
                      "/system/xbin/su", "/data/local/xbin/su", "/data/local/bin/su", "/system/sd/xbin/su",
                      "/system/bin/failsafe/su", "/data/local/su", "/su/bin/su"};

int counter =0;
while (counter<9){
    if(FILE *file = fopen(paths[counter],"r")){
        fclose(file);
        return 1;
    }
    counter++;
}
return 0;
}

您将从java代码中调用该函数，如下所示

public class Root_detect {



   /**
    *
    * function that calls a native function to check if the device is 
    *rooted or not
    * @return boolean: true if the device is rooted, false if the 
    *device is not rooted
   */
   public boolean check_rooted(){

        int checker = rootFunction();

        if(checker==1){
           return true;
        }else {
           return false;
        }
   }
   static {
    System.loadLibrary("cpp-root-lib");//name of your cpp file
   }

   public native int rootFunction();
}

这里列出的许多答案都有内在的问题:

Checking for test-keys is correlated with root access but doesn't necessarily guarantee it "PATH" directories should be derived from the actual "PATH" environment variable instead of being hard coded The existence of the "su" executable doesn't necessarily mean the device has been rooted The "which" executable may or may not be installed, and you should let the system resolve its path if possible Just because the SuperUser app is installed on the device does not mean the device has root access yet

Stericson的RootTools库似乎可以更合理地检查root。它还有很多额外的工具和实用程序，所以我强烈推荐它。然而，并没有解释它是如何专门检查根目录的，而且它可能比大多数应用程序真正需要的要重一些。

我已经创建了几个基于RootTools库的实用程序方法。如果你只是想检查“su”可执行文件是否在设备上，你可以使用以下方法:

public static boolean isRootAvailable(){
    for(String pathDir : System.getenv("PATH").split(":")){
        if(new File(pathDir, "su").exists()) {
            return true;
        }
    }
    return false;
}

这个方法简单地遍历“PATH”环境变量中列出的目录，并检查其中是否存在“su”文件。

为了真正检查root访问权限，必须实际运行“su”命令。如果安装了一个像SuperUser这样的应用程序，那么在这一点上它可能会要求root访问，或者如果它已经被授予/拒绝，吐司可能会显示是否授予/拒绝访问。一个很好的命令是“id”，这样您可以验证用户id实际上是0(根)。

下面是一个示例方法来确定是否授予了根访问权:

public static boolean isRootGiven(){
    if (isRootAvailable()) {
        Process process = null;
        try {
            process = Runtime.getRuntime().exec(new String[]{"su", "-c", "id"});
            BufferedReader in = new BufferedReader(new InputStreamReader(process.getInputStream()));
            String output = in.readLine();
            if (output != null && output.toLowerCase().contains("uid=0"))
                return true;
        } catch (Exception e) {
            e.printStackTrace();
        } finally {
            if (process != null)
                process.destroy();
        }
    }

    return false;
}

实际测试运行"su"命令是很重要的，因为一些模拟器已经预安装了"su"可执行文件，但只允许某些用户像adb shell一样访问它。

在尝试运行“su”可执行文件之前检查它的存在也是很重要的，因为android已经知道不会正确地处理试图运行缺失命令的进程。随着时间的推移，这些幽灵进程会消耗大量内存。