一些用于设置系统属性ro的修改版本。Modversion用于此目的。事情似乎已经发生了变化;我几个月前在TheDude上的构建是这样的:

cmb@apollo:~$ adb -d shell getprop |grep build
[ro.build.id]: [CUPCAKE]
[ro.build.display.id]: [htc_dream-eng 1.5 CUPCAKE eng.TheDudeAbides.20090427.235325 test-keys]
[ro.build.version.incremental]: [eng.TheDude.2009027.235325]
[ro.build.version.sdk]: [3]
[ro.build.version.release]: [1.5]
[ro.build.date]: [Mon Apr 20 01:42:32 CDT 2009]
[ro.build.date.utc]: [1240209752]
[ro.build.type]: [eng]
[ro.build.user]: [TheDude]
[ro.build.host]: [ender]
[ro.build.tags]: [test-keys]
[ro.build.product]: [dream]
[ro.build.description]: [kila-user 1.1 PLAT-RC33 126986 ota-rel-keys,release-keys]
[ro.build.fingerprint]: [tmobile/kila/dream/trout:1.1/PLAT-RC33/126986:user/ota-rel-keys,release-keys]
[ro.build.changelist]: [17615# end build properties]

另一方面，来自1.5 SDK的模拟器，运行1.5镜像，也有根，可能类似于Android Dev Phone 1(你可能想要允许)，并有这个:

cmb@apollo:~$ adb -e shell getprop |grep build
[ro.build.id]: [CUPCAKE]
[ro.build.display.id]: [sdk-eng 1.5 CUPCAKE 148875 test-keys]
[ro.build.version.incremental]: [148875]
[ro.build.version.sdk]: [3]
[ro.build.version.release]: [1.5]
[ro.build.date]: [Thu May 14 18:09:10 PDT 2009]
[ro.build.date.utc]: [1242349750]
[ro.build.type]: [eng]
[ro.build.user]: [android-build]
[ro.build.host]: [undroid16.mtv.corp.google.com]
[ro.build.tags]: [test-keys]
[ro.build.product]: [generic]
[ro.build.description]: [sdk-eng 1.5 CUPCAKE 148875 test-keys]
[ro.build.fingerprint]: [generic/sdk/generic/:1.5/CUPCAKE/148875:eng/test-keys]

至于零售构建，我手头没有，但在site:xda developers.com下的各种搜索提供了大量信息。这是荷兰的G1, ro。build。tags没有test-key，我认为这可能是最可靠的属性。

在我的应用程序中，我通过执行“su”命令检查设备是否根。但是今天我删除了这部分代码。为什么?

因为我的应用程序成了内存杀手。怎么做?让我告诉你我的故事。

There were some complaints that my application was slowing down devices(Of course I thought that can not be true). I tried to figure out why. So I used MAT to get heap dumps and analyze, and everything seemed perfect. But after relaunching my app many times I realized that device is really getting slower and stopping my application didn't make it faster (unless I restart device). I analyzed dump files again while device is very slow. But everything was still perfect for dump file. Then I did what must be done at first. I listed processes.

$ adb shell ps

使震惊;我的应用程序有许多进程(应用程序的进程标签在manifest上)。有些是僵尸，有些不是。

对于一个只有一个Activity并只执行“su”命令的示例应用程序，我意识到在每次启动应用程序时都会创建一个僵尸进程。起初，这些僵尸进程分配0KB，但后来发生了一些事情，僵尸进程与我的应用程序的主进程占用了几乎相同的kb，它们成为了标准进程。

在bugs.sun.com: http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=6474073上有一个关于相同问题的错误报告，这解释了如果命令没有找到，将使用exec()方法创建僵尸。但我仍然不明白它们为什么以及如何成为标准流程并保持重要的kb。(这并不是一直都在发生)

你可以尝试如果你想下面的代码示例;

String commandToExecute = "su";
executeShellCommand(commandToExecute);

简单的命令执行方法;

private boolean executeShellCommand(String command){
    Process process = null;            
    try{
        process = Runtime.getRuntime().exec(command);
        return true;
    } catch (Exception e) {
        return false;
    } finally{
        if(process != null){
            try{
                process.destroy();
            }catch (Exception e) {
            }
        }
    }
}

总结:总结;我没有建议你确定设备是否扎根。但如果我是你，我不会使用Runtime.getRuntime().exec()。

顺便说一下;RootTools.isRootAvailable()也会引起同样的问题。

if [[ "`adb shell which su | grep -io "permission denied"`" != "permission denied" ]]; then
   echo "Yes. Rooted device."
 else
   echo "No. Device not rooted. Only limited tasks can be performed. Done."
    zenity --warning --title="Device Not Rooted" --text="The connected Android Device is <b>NOT ROOTED</b>. Only limited tasks can be performed." --no-wrap
fi

如果你已经在使用Fabric/Firebase Crashlytics，你可以打电话

CommonUtils.isRooted(context)

这是该方法的当前实现:

public static boolean isRooted(Context context) {
    boolean isEmulator = isEmulator(context);
    String buildTags = Build.TAGS;
    if (!isEmulator && buildTags != null && buildTags.contains("test-keys")) {
        return true;
    } else {
        File file = new File("/system/app/Superuser.apk");
        if (file.exists()) {
            return true;
        } else {
            file = new File("/system/xbin/su");
            return !isEmulator && file.exists();
        }
    }
}

public static boolean isEmulator(Context context) {
    String androidId = Secure.getString(context.getContentResolver(), "android_id");
    return "sdk".equals(Build.PRODUCT) || "google_sdk".equals(Build.PRODUCT) || androidId == null;
}

如果你不想使用任何第三方库或任何随机解决方案，那么就使用谷歌库来检测它。

Android设备验证

回应:

{
  "timestampMs": 9860437986543,
  "nonce": "R2Rra24fVm5xa2Mg",
  "apkPackageName": "com.package.name.of.requesting.app",
  "apkCertificateDigestSha256": ["base64 encoded, SHA-256 hash of the
                                  certificate used to sign requesting app"],
  "ctsProfileMatch": true,
  "basicIntegrity": true,
}

ctsprofilmatch如果设备已根，则给出false。

参考链接: [1]: https://developer.android.com/training/safetynet/attestation

根据这里的一些答案，我合并了它们，并添加了一个检查是否安装了一些已知的根管理器应用程序:

fun isProbablyRooted(context: Context, alsoIncludeCheckingRootManagerApp: Boolean = false): Boolean {
    return hasRootManagerSystemApp(context) || (alsoIncludeCheckingRootManagerApp && hasRootManagerSystemApp(context))
}

fun hasRootManagerSystemApp(context: Context): Boolean {
    val rootAppsPackageNames = arrayOf("com.topjohnwu.magisk", "eu.chainfire.supersu", "com.koushikdutta.superuser", "com.noshufou.android.su", "me.phh.superuser")
    rootAppsPackageNames.forEach { rootAppPackageName ->
        try {
            context.packageManager.getApplicationInfo(rootAppPackageName, 0)
            return true
        } catch (e: Exception) {
        }
    }
    return false
}

fun hasSuBinary(): Boolean {
    return try {
        findBinary("su")
    } catch (e: Exception) {
        e.printStackTrace()
        false
    }
}

private fun findBinary(binaryName: String): Boolean {
    val paths = System.getenv("PATH")
    if (!paths.isNullOrBlank()) {
        val systemPlaces: List<String> = paths.split(":")
        return systemPlaces.firstOrNull { File(it, binaryName).exists() } != null
    }
    val places = arrayOf("/sbin/", "/system/bin/", "/system/xbin/", "/data/local/xbin/", "/data/local/bin/",
            "/system/sd/xbin/", "/system/bin/failsafe/", "/data/local/")
    return places.firstOrNull { File(it, binaryName).exists() } != null
}

清单:

<queries>
    <package android:name="com.topjohnwu.magisk" />
    <package android:name="eu.chainfire.supersu" />
    <package android:name="com.koushikdutta.superuser" />
    <package android:name="com.noshufou.android.su" />
    <package android:name="me.phh.superuser" />
</queries>

当然，这仍然是一个猜测，就像所有其他解一样。 例如，用户可以安装Magisk，而无需对设备进行root操作。