这很容易扭曲正常人的大脑，所以我找到了一个更容易理解的视觉方法:

勒解释

如果两个范围“太胖”，无法放入正好是两者宽度之和的槽中，那么它们就会重叠。

对于范围[a1, a2]和[b1, b2]，这将是:

/**
 * we are testing for:
 *     max point - min point < w1 + w2    
 **/
if max(a2, b2) - min(a1, b1) < (a2 - a1) + (b2 - b1) {
  // too fat -- they overlap!
}

什么新东西。只是可读性更强。

def overlap(event_1, event_2):

    start_time_1 = event_1[0]
    end_time_1 = event_1[1]

    start_time_2 = event_2[0]
    end_time_2 = event_2[1]

    start_late = max(start_time_1, start_time_2)
    end_early = min(end_time_1, end_time_2)


    # The event that starts late should only be after the event ending early.
    if start_late > end_early:
        print("Absoloutly No overlap!")
    else:
        print("Events do overlap!")

重叠(X, Y):= if (X1 <= Y1) then (Y1 <= X2) else (X1 <= Y2)。

证明:

考虑X在Y之前或与Y左对齐的情况，即X1 <= Y1。那么Y要么在X内部开始，要么在X的末尾开始，即Y1 <= X2;或者Y远离x，第一个条件是重叠;第二个，不是。

在互补的情况下，Y在X之前，同样的逻辑适用于交换的实体。

So,

重叠(X, Y):= if (X1 <= Y) then (Y1 <= X2) else重叠(Y, X)。

但这似乎并不完全正确。在递归调用中，第一个测试是多余的，因为我们已经从第一个调用的第一个测试中知道了实体的相对位置。因此，我们实际上只需要测试第二个条件，即交换后(X1 <= Y2)。所以,

重叠(X, Y):= if (X1 <= Y1) then (Y1 <= X2) else (X1 <= Y2)。

QED.

Ada的实现:

   type Range_T is array (1 .. 2) of Integer;

   function Overlap (X, Y: Range_T) return Boolean is
     (if X(1) <= Y(1) then Y(1) <= X(2) else X(1) <= Y(2));

测试程序:

with Ada.Text_IO; use Ada.Text_IO;

procedure Main is

   type Range_T is array (1 .. 2) of Integer;

   function Overlap (X, Y: Range_T) return Boolean is
     (if X(1) <= Y(1) then Y(1) <= X(2) else X(1) <= Y(2));

   function Img (X: Range_T) return String is
     (" [" & X(1)'Img & X(2)'Img & " ] ");

   procedure Test (X, Y: Range_T; Expect: Boolean) is
      B: Boolean := Overlap (X, Y);
   begin
      Put_Line
        (Img (X) & " and " & Img (Y) &
         (if B then " overlap .......... "
               else " do not overlap ... ") &
         (if B = Expect then "PASS" else "FAIL"));
   end;
         
begin
   Test ( (1, 2), (2, 3), True);  --  chained
   Test ( (2, 3), (1, 2), True);

   Test ( (4, 9), (5, 7), True);  --  inside
   Test ( (5, 7), (4, 9), True);

   Test ( (1, 5), (3, 7), True);  --  proper overlap
   Test ( (3, 7), (1, 5), True);

   Test ( (1, 2), (3, 4), False);  -- back to back
   Test ( (3, 4), (1, 2), False);

   Test ( (1, 2), (5, 7), False);  -- disjoint
   Test ( (5, 7), (1, 2), False);
end;

以上程序输出:

 [ 1 2 ]  and  [ 2 3 ]  overlap .......... PASS
 [ 2 3 ]  and  [ 1 2 ]  overlap .......... PASS
 [ 4 9 ]  and  [ 5 7 ]  overlap .......... PASS
 [ 5 7 ]  and  [ 4 9 ]  overlap .......... PASS
 [ 1 5 ]  and  [ 3 7 ]  overlap .......... PASS
 [ 3 7 ]  and  [ 1 5 ]  overlap .......... PASS
 [ 1 2 ]  and  [ 3 4 ]  do not overlap ... PASS
 [ 3 4 ]  and  [ 1 2 ]  do not overlap ... PASS
 [ 1 2 ]  and  [ 5 7 ]  do not overlap ... PASS
 [ 5 7 ]  and  [ 1 2 ]  do not overlap ... PASS

如果有人正在寻找计算实际重叠的一行程序:

int overlap = ( x2 > y1 || y2 < x1 ) ? 0 : (y2 >= y1 && x2 <= y1 ? y1 : y2) - ( x2 <= x1 && y2 >= x1 ? x1 : x2) + 1; //max 11 operations

如果你想要少一些操作，但多一些变量:

bool b1 = x2 <= y1;
bool b2 = y2 >= x1;
int overlap = ( !b1 || !b2 ) ? 0 : (y2 >= y1 && b1 ? y1 : y2) - ( x2 <= x1 && b2 ? x1 : x2) + 1; // max 9 operations

以下是我的看法:

int xmin = min(x1,x2)
  , xmax = max(x1,x2)
  , ymin = min(y1,y2)
  , ymax = max(y1,y2);

for (int i = xmin; i < xmax; ++i)
    if (ymin <= i && i <= ymax)
        return true;

return false;

除非您正在对数十亿个宽间距整数运行一些高性能的范围检查器，否则我们的版本应该执行类似的操作。我的观点是，这是微观优化。

我相信min(upper(A)，upper(B))>=max(lower(A)，lower(B))将是一个很好的解决方案，不仅因为它的简单性，而且因为它超越了两个范围的可扩展性。