这通常不是最有效的解决方案,但它是我需要的。

function clone(obj, clones) {
    // Makes a deep copy of 'obj'. Handles cyclic structures by
    // tracking cloned obj's in the 'clones' parameter. Functions 
    // are included, but not cloned. Functions members are cloned.
    var new_obj,
        already_cloned,
        t = typeof obj,
        i = 0,
        l,
        pair; 

    clones = clones || [];

    if (obj === null) {
        return obj;
    }

    if (t === "object" || t === "function") {

        // check to see if we've already cloned obj
        for (i = 0, l = clones.length; i < l; i++) {
            pair = clones[i];
            if (pair[0] === obj) {
                already_cloned = pair[1];
                break;
            }
        }

        if (already_cloned) {
            return already_cloned; 
        } else {
            if (t === "object") { // create new object
                new_obj = new obj.constructor();
            } else { // Just use functions as is
                new_obj = obj;
            }

            clones.push([obj, new_obj]); // keep track of objects we've cloned

            for (key in obj) { // clone object members
                if (obj.hasOwnProperty(key)) {
                    new_obj[key] = clone(obj[key], clones);
                }
            }
        }
    }
    return new_obj || obj;
}

自行车测试...

a = []
a.push("b", "c", a)
aa = clone(a)
aa === a //=> false
aa[2] === a //=> false
aa[2] === a[2] //=> false
aa[2] === aa //=> true

功能测试...

f = new Function
f.a = a
ff = clone(f)
ff === f //=> true
ff.a === a //=> false

这是我创建的最快的方法,不使用原型,所以它将保持在新对象中拥有自己的所有权。

解决方案是对原件的顶级属性进行 iterate,创建两个副本,从原件中删除每个属性,然后重新设置原件并返回新副本,它只需要像顶级属性一样多次 iterate。

唯一的缺点是,原始对象必须配备其原创创建的名称空间,以便重新设置。

copyDeleteAndReset:function(namespace,strObjName){
    var obj = namespace[strObjName],
    objNew = {},objOrig = {};
    for(i in obj){
        if(obj.hasOwnProperty(i)){
            objNew[i] = objOrig[i] = obj[i];
            delete obj[i];
        }
    }
    namespace[strObjName] = objOrig;
    return objNew;
}

var namespace = {};
namespace.objOrig = {
    '0':{
        innerObj:{a:0,b:1,c:2}
    }
}

var objNew = copyDeleteAndReset(namespace,'objOrig');
objNew['0'] = 'NEW VALUE';

console.log(objNew['0']) === 'NEW VALUE';
console.log(namespace.objOrig['0']) === innerObj:{a:0,b:1,c:2};

因为回归只是太昂贵的JavaScript,我发现的大多数答案是使用回归,而JSON方法将错过非JSON转换部分(功能等)。所以我做了一些研究,并发现这个拖拉机技术避免它。

/*
 * Trampoline to avoid recursion in JavaScript, see:
 *     https://www.integralist.co.uk/posts/functional-recursive-javascript-programming/
 */
function trampoline() {
    var func = arguments[0];
    var args = [];
    for (var i = 1; i < arguments.length; i++) {
        args[i - 1] = arguments[i];
    }

    var currentBatch = func.apply(this, args);
    var nextBatch = [];

    while (currentBatch && currentBatch.length > 0) {
        currentBatch.forEach(function(eachFunc) {
            var ret = eachFunc();
            if (ret && ret.length > 0) {
                nextBatch = nextBatch.concat(ret);
            }
        });

        currentBatch = nextBatch;
        nextBatch = [];
    }
};

/*
 *  Deep clone an object using the trampoline technique.
 *
 *  @param target {Object} Object to clone
 *  @return {Object} Cloned object.
 */
function clone(target) {
    if (typeof target !== 'object') {
        return target;
    }
    if (target == null || Object.keys(target).length == 0) {
        return target;
    }

    function _clone(b, a) {
        var nextBatch = [];
        for (var key in b) {
            if (typeof b[key] === 'object' && b[key] !== null) {
                if (b[key] instanceof Array) {
                    a[key] = [];
                }
                else {
                    a[key] = {};
                }
                nextBatch.push(_clone.bind(null, b[key], a[key]));
            }
            else {
                a[key] = b[key];
            }
        }
        return nextBatch;
    };

    var ret = target instanceof Array ? [] : {};
    (trampoline.bind(null, _clone))(target, ret);
    return ret;
};

使用今天的JavaScript来克隆一个对象:ECMAScript 2015(以前被称为ECMAScript 6)

var original = {a: 1};

// Method 1: New object with original assigned.
var copy1 = Object.assign({}, original);

// Method 2: New object with spread operator assignment.
var copy2 = {...original};

旧浏览器可能不支持 ECMAScript 2015. 一个常见的解决方案是使用 JavaScript-to-JavaScript 编译器,如 Babel 发行您的 JavaScript 代码的 ECMAScript 5 版本。

正如 @jim-hall 指出的那样,这只是一个微小的副本. 属性属性被复制为参考:更改一个将改变另一个对象/实例的值。

我迟到回答这个问题,但我有另一种方式来克隆对象:

function cloneObject(obj) {
    if (obj === null || typeof(obj) !== 'object')
        return obj;
    var temp = obj.constructor(); // changed
    for (var key in obj) {
        if (Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(obj, key)) {
            obj['isActiveClone'] = null;
            temp[key] = cloneObject(obj[key]);
            delete obj['isActiveClone'];
        }
    }
    return temp;
}

var b = cloneObject({"a":1,"b":2});   // calling

更快、更快的是:

var a = {"a":1,"b":2};
var b = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(a));  

和

var a = {"a":1,"b":2};

// Deep copy
var newObject = jQuery.extend(true, {}, a);

我已经标记了代码,你可以在这里测试结果:

和分享结果: 参考: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Object/hasOwnProperty

// obj target object, vals source object
var setVals = function (obj, vals) {
    if (obj && vals) {
        for (var x in vals) {
            if (vals.hasOwnProperty(x)) {
                if (obj[x] && typeof vals[x] === 'object') {
                    obj[x] = setVals(obj[x], vals[x]);
                } else {
                    obj[x] = vals[x];
                }
            }
        }
    }
    return obj;
};