class Handler { static deepCopy (obj) { if (Object.prototype.toString.call(obj) === '[object Array]') { const result = []; for (let i = 0, len = obj.length; i < len; i++) { result[i] = Handler.deepCopy(obj[i]); } return result; } else if (Object.prototype.toString.call(obj) === '[object Object]') { const result = {}; for (let prop in obj) { result[prop] = Handler.deepCopy(obj[prop]); } return result; } return obj; } }

因为回归只是太昂贵的JavaScript,我发现的大多数答案是使用回归,而JSON方法将错过非JSON转换部分(功能等)。所以我做了一些研究,并发现这个拖拉机技术避免它。

/*
 * Trampoline to avoid recursion in JavaScript, see:
 *     https://www.integralist.co.uk/posts/functional-recursive-javascript-programming/
 */
function trampoline() {
    var func = arguments[0];
    var args = [];
    for (var i = 1; i < arguments.length; i++) {
        args[i - 1] = arguments[i];
    }

    var currentBatch = func.apply(this, args);
    var nextBatch = [];

    while (currentBatch && currentBatch.length > 0) {
        currentBatch.forEach(function(eachFunc) {
            var ret = eachFunc();
            if (ret && ret.length > 0) {
                nextBatch = nextBatch.concat(ret);
            }
        });

        currentBatch = nextBatch;
        nextBatch = [];
    }
};

/*
 *  Deep clone an object using the trampoline technique.
 *
 *  @param target {Object} Object to clone
 *  @return {Object} Cloned object.
 */
function clone(target) {
    if (typeof target !== 'object') {
        return target;
    }
    if (target == null || Object.keys(target).length == 0) {
        return target;
    }

    function _clone(b, a) {
        var nextBatch = [];
        for (var key in b) {
            if (typeof b[key] === 'object' && b[key] !== null) {
                if (b[key] instanceof Array) {
                    a[key] = [];
                }
                else {
                    a[key] = {};
                }
                nextBatch.push(_clone.bind(null, b[key], a[key]));
            }
            else {
                a[key] = b[key];
            }
        }
        return nextBatch;
    };

    var ret = target instanceof Array ? [] : {};
    (trampoline.bind(null, _clone))(target, ret);
    return ret;
};

有这么多方法可以实现这一点,但如果你想做到这一点没有任何图书馆,你可以使用以下方式:

const cloneObject = (oldObject) => {
  let newObject = oldObject;
  if (oldObject && typeof oldObject === 'object') {
    if(Array.isArray(oldObject)) {
      newObject = [];
    } else if (Object.prototype.toString.call(oldObject) === '[object Date]' && !isNaN(oldObject)) {
      newObject = new Date(oldObject.getTime());
    } else {
      newObject = {};
      for (let i in oldObject) {
        newObject[i] = cloneObject(oldObject[i]);
      }
    }

  }
  return newObject;
}

让我知道你在想什么。

Object.assign({},sourceObj)只有在其属性没有参考类型密钥时才会克隆对象。

obj={a:"lol",b:["yes","no","maybe"]}
clonedObj = Object.assign({},obj);

clonedObj.b.push("skip")// changes will reflected to the actual obj as well because of its reference type.
obj.b //will also console => yes,no,maybe,skip

因此,对于深度克隆,不可能以这种方式实现。

最有效的解决方案是

var obj = Json.stringify(yourSourceObj)
var cloned = Json.parse(obj);

如何将对象的关键与其价值相结合?

function deepClone(o) {
    var keys = Object.keys(o);
    var values = Object.values(o);

    var clone = {};

    keys.forEach(function(key, i) {
        clone[key] = typeof values[i] == 'object' ? Object.create(values[i]) : values[i];
    });

    return clone;
}

注意: 这种方法不一定会做更深的复制,但它只会用一个内部对象的深度复制,这意味着当你给出像 {a: {b: {c: null}}} 这样的东西时,它只会克隆直接在它们内部的对象,所以 deepClone(a.b.c)技术上是对 a.b.c 的参考,而 deepClone(a.b)则是克隆,而不是参考。

如果你发现自己做这种类型的事情是正常的(例如,创建 undo redo 功能 ) 它可能值得看看 Immutable.js

const map1 = Immutable.fromJS( { a: 1, b: 2, c: { d: 3 } } );
const map2 = map1.setIn( [ 'c', 'd' ], 50 );

console.log( `${ map1.getIn( [ 'c', 'd' ] ) } vs ${ map2.getIn( [ 'c', 'd' ] ) }` ); // "3 vs 50"

https://codepen.io/anon/pen/OBpqNE?编辑器=1111