这本书读起来很有趣。我自己也在思考同样的问题，思考这个问题的好处是:

Trying to imagine how to implement OOP concepts in a non-OOP language helps me understand the strengths of the OOp language (in my case, C++). This helps give me better judgement about whether to use C or C++ for a given type of application -- where the benefits of one out-weighs the other. In my browsing the web for information and opinions on this I found an author who was writing code for an embedded processor and only had a C compiler available: http://www.eetimes.com/discussion/other/4024626/Object-Oriented-C-Creating-Foundation-Classes-Part-1

在他的案例中，用普通C语言分析和调整面向对象的概念是一种有效的追求。他似乎愿意牺牲一些面向对象的概念，因为尝试用C语言实现它们会带来性能开销。

我得到的教训是，是的，在某种程度上它是可以做到的，是的，有一些很好的理由去尝试。

In the end, the machine is twiddling stack pointer bits, making the program counter jump around and calculating memory access operations. From the efficiency standpoint, the fewer of these calculations done by your program, the better... but sometimes we have to pay this tax simply so we can organize our program in a way that makes it least susceptible to human error. The OOP language compiler strives to optimize both aspects. The programmer has to be much more careful implementing these concepts in a language like C.

是的，这是可能的。

这是纯C语言，没有宏预处理。它具有继承、多态、数据封装(包括私有数据)。它没有等效的受保护限定符，这意味着私有数据在整个继承链中也是私有的。

#include "triangle.h"
#include "rectangle.h"
#include "polygon.h"

#include <stdio.h>

int main()
{
    Triangle tr1= CTriangle->new();
    Rectangle rc1= CRectangle->new();

    tr1->width= rc1->width= 3.2;
    tr1->height= rc1->height= 4.1;

    CPolygon->printArea((Polygon)tr1);

    printf("\n");

    CPolygon->printArea((Polygon)rc1);
}

/*output:
6.56
13.12
*/

我已经研究这个一年了

由于GObject系统很难用纯C语言使用，所以我尝试编写一些不错的宏来简化C语言的OO风格。

#include "OOStd.h"

CLASS(Animal) {
    char *name;
    STATIC(Animal);
    vFn talk;
};
static int Animal_load(Animal *THIS,void *name) {
    THIS->name = name;
    return 0;
}
ASM(Animal, Animal_load, NULL, NULL, NULL)

CLASS_EX(Cat,Animal) {
    STATIC_EX(Cat, Animal);
};
static void Meow(Animal *THIS){
    printf("Meow!My name is %s!\n", THIS->name);
}

static int Cat_loadSt(StAnimal *THIS, void *PARAM){
    THIS->talk = (void *)Meow;
    return 0;
}
ASM_EX(Cat,Animal, NULL, NULL, Cat_loadSt, NULL)


CLASS_EX(Dog,Animal){
    STATIC_EX(Dog, Animal);
};

static void Woof(Animal *THIS){
    printf("Woof!My name is %s!\n", THIS->name);
}

static int Dog_loadSt(StAnimal *THIS, void *PARAM) {
    THIS->talk = (void *)Woof;
    return 0;
}
ASM_EX(Dog, Animal, NULL, NULL, Dog_loadSt, NULL)

int main(){
    Animal *animals[4000];
    StAnimal *f;
    int i = 0;
    for (i=0; i<4000; i++)
    {
        if(i%2==0)
            animals[i] = NEW(Dog,"Jack");
        else
            animals[i] = NEW(Cat,"Lily");
    };
    f = ST(animals[0]);
    for(i=0; i<4000; ++i) {
        f->talk(animals[i]);
    }
    for (i=0; i<4000; ++i) {
        DELETE0(animals[i]);
    }
    return 0;
}

这是我的项目网站(我没有足够的时间写en。Doc，不过中文的Doc要好得多)。

东方海外海湾合作委员会

我相信，用C语言实现OOP除了本身很有用外，还是学习OOP和理解其内部工作原理的好方法。许多程序员的经验表明，要有效和自信地使用一项技术，程序员必须理解底层概念最终是如何实现的。在C语言中模拟类、继承和多态性就教会了我们这一点。

为了回答最初的问题，这里有一些资源，教如何在C中进行OOP:

embeddegurus.com博客文章“C中基于对象的编程”展示了如何在可移植C中实现类和单继承: http://embeddedgurus.com/state-space/2008/01/object-based-programming-in-c/

应用笔记“C+ - C面向对象编程”展示了如何使用预处理器宏在C中实现类、单继承和后期绑定(多态性): http://www.state-machine.com/resources/cplus_3.0_manual.pdf，示例代码可从http://www.state-machine.com/resources/cplus_3.0.zip获得

我建议使用Objective-C，它是C的超集。

虽然Objective-C已经有30年的历史了，但它允许编写优雅的代码。

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Objective-C

命名空间通常通过以下方式实现:

stack_push(thing *)

而不是

stack::push(thing *)

要将C结构体变成类似c++类的东西，您可以转向:

class stack {
     public:
        stack();
        void push(thing *);
        thing * pop();
        static int this_is_here_as_an_example_only;
     private:
        ...
};

Into

struct stack {
     struct stack_type * my_type;
     // Put the stuff that you put after private: here
};
struct stack_type {
     void (* construct)(struct stack * this); // This takes uninitialized memory
     struct stack * (* operator_new)(); // This allocates a new struct, passes it to construct, and then returns it
     void (*push)(struct stack * this, thing * t); // Pushing t onto this stack
     thing * (*pop)(struct stack * this); // Pops the top thing off the stack and returns it
     int this_is_here_as_an_example_only;
}Stack = {
    .construct = stack_construct,
    .operator_new = stack_operator_new,
    .push = stack_push,
    .pop = stack_pop
};
// All of these functions are assumed to be defined somewhere else

和做的事:

struct stack * st = Stack.operator_new(); // Make a new stack
if (!st) {
   // Do something about it
} else {
   // You can use the stack
   stack_push(st, thing0); // This is a non-virtual call
   Stack.push(st, thing1); // This is like casting *st to a Stack (which it already is) and doing the push
   st->my_type.push(st, thing2); // This is a virtual call
}

我没有做析构函数或删除，但它遵循相同的模式。

This_is_here_as_an_example_only类似于一个静态类变量——在一个类型的所有实例之间共享。所有的方法都是静态的，除了一些采用this *