另一个python解决方案是使用itertools.combination模块，如下所示:

#!/usr/local/bin/python

from itertools import combinations

def find_sum_in_list(numbers, target):
    results = []
    for x in range(len(numbers)):
        results.extend(
            [   
                combo for combo in combinations(numbers ,x)  
                    if sum(combo) == target
            ]   
        )   

    print results

if __name__ == "__main__":
    find_sum_in_list([3,9,8,4,5,7,10], 15)

输出:[(8,7)，(5,10)，(3,8,4)，(3,5,7)]

这是R中的一个解

subset_sum = function(numbers,target,partial=0){
  if(any(is.na(partial))) return()
  s = sum(partial)
  if(s == target) print(sprintf("sum(%s)=%s",paste(partial[-1],collapse="+"),target))
  if(s > target) return()
  for( i in seq_along(numbers)){
    n = numbers[i]
    remaining = numbers[(i+1):length(numbers)]
    subset_sum(remaining,target,c(partial,n))
  }
}

我在做类似的scala作业。我想在这里发布我的解决方案:

 def countChange(money: Int, coins: List[Int]): Int = {
      def getCount(money: Int, remainingCoins: List[Int]): Int = {
        if(money == 0 ) 1
        else if(money < 0 || remainingCoins.isEmpty) 0
        else
          getCount(money, remainingCoins.tail) +
            getCount(money - remainingCoins.head, remainingCoins)
      }
      if(money == 0 || coins.isEmpty) 0
      else getCount(money, coins)
    }

这个问题的一个迭代c++堆栈解决方案。与其他迭代解决方案不同的是，它不会对中间序列进行不必要的复制。

#include <vector>
#include <iostream>

// Given a positive integer, return all possible combinations of
// positive integers that sum up to it.

std::vector<std::vector<int>> print_all_sum(int target){
    std::vector<std::vector<int>> output;
    std::vector<int> stack;

    int curr_min = 1;
    int sum = 0;
    while (curr_min < target) {
        sum += curr_min;
        if (sum >= target) {
            if (sum == target) {
                output.push_back(stack); // make a copy
                output.back().push_back(curr_min);
            }
            sum -= curr_min + stack.back();
            curr_min = stack.back() + 1;
            stack.pop_back();
        } else {
            stack.push_back(curr_min);
        }
    }

    return output;
}

int main()
{
    auto vvi = print_all_sum(6);

    for (auto const& v: vvi) {
        for(auto const& i: v) {
        std::cout << i;
        }
        std::cout << "\n";
    }

    return 0;
}

输出print_all_sum (6):

111111
11112
1113
1122
114
123
15
222
24
33

c#版本的@msalvadores代码的答案

void Main()
{
    int[] numbers = {3,9,8,4,5,7,10};
    int target = 15;
    sum_up(new List<int>(numbers.ToList()),target);
}

static void sum_up_recursive(List<int> numbers, int target, List<int> part)
{
   int s = 0;
   foreach (int x in part)
   {
       s += x;
   }
   if (s == target)
   {
        Console.WriteLine("sum(" + string.Join(",", part.Select(n => n.ToString()).ToArray()) + ")=" + target);
   }
   if (s >= target)
   {
        return;
   }
   for (int i = 0;i < numbers.Count;i++)
   {
         var remaining = new List<int>();
         int n = numbers[i];
         for (int j = i + 1; j < numbers.Count;j++)
         {
             remaining.Add(numbers[j]);
         }
         var part_rec = new List<int>(part);
         part_rec.Add(n);
         sum_up_recursive(remaining,target,part_rec);
   }
}
static void sum_up(List<int> numbers, int target)
{
    sum_up_recursive(numbers,target,new List<int>());
}

我想我应该用这个问题的答案，但我不能，所以这是我的答案。它使用的是《计算机程序的结构和解释》中答案的修改版本。我认为这是一个更好的递归解，应该更能取悦纯粹主义者。

我的答案是用Scala(如果我的Scala很烂，我很抱歉，我刚刚开始学习)。findsumcombination的疯狂之处在于对递归的原始列表进行排序和惟一，以防止欺骗。

def findSumCombinations(target: Int, numbers: List[Int]): Int = {
  cc(target, numbers.distinct.sortWith(_ < _), List())
}

def cc(target: Int, numbers: List[Int], solution: List[Int]): Int = {
  if (target == 0) {println(solution); 1 }
  else if (target < 0 || numbers.length == 0) 0
  else 
    cc(target, numbers.tail, solution) 
    + cc(target - numbers.head, numbers, numbers.head :: solution)
}

使用它:

 > findSumCombinations(12345, List(1,5,22,15,0,..))
 * Prints a whole heap of lists that will sum to the target *