这里有一种方法可以用不变的方式来做。它处理负数以及一个额外的奖励。与编辑原始数组相比，这以性能为代价减少了可能的错误数量。

const numbers = [1, 2, 3];
const moveElement = (array, from, to) => {
  const copy = [...array];
  const valueToMove = copy.splice(from, 1)[0];
  copy.splice(to, 0, valueToMove);
  return copy;
};

console.log(moveElement(numbers, 0, 2))
// > [2, 3, 1]
console.log(moveElement(numbers, -1, -3))
// > [3, 1, 2] 

splice()方法的作用是:向数组中添加/从数组中删除项，并返回已删除的项。 注意:该方法会改变原始数组。/ w3schools /

Array.prototype.move = function(from,to){
  this.splice(to,0,this.splice(from,1)[0]);
  return this;
};

var arr = [ 'a', 'b', 'c', 'd', 'e'];
arr.move(3,1);//["a", "d", "b", "c", "e"]


var arr = [ 'a', 'b', 'c', 'd', 'e'];
arr.move(0,2);//["b", "c", "a", "d", "e"]

由于函数是可链的，这也工作:

alert(arr.move(0,2).join(','));

演示

如果你想要npm上的一个版本，array-move是最接近这个答案的，尽管它不是相同的实现。更多细节请参见其用法部分。这个答案的前一个版本(修改了Array.prototype.move)可以在npm的Array.prototype.move中找到。

我在这个函数上做得相当成功:

函数array_move(arr, old_index, new_index) { If (new_index >= arr.length) { Var k = new_index - arr。长度+ 1; 当(k——){ arr.push(定义); ｝ ｝ 加勒比海盗。拼接(new_index, 0, arr.)拼接(old_index, 1) [0]); 返回arr;//用于测试 }; //返回[2,1,3] Console.log (array_move([1,2,3]， 0,1));

请注意，最后一个返回值只是用于测试目的:splice在原地对数组执行操作，因此不需要返回值。通过扩展，这个动作是一个原地操作。如果你想避免这种情况并返回一个副本，请使用slice。

逐步执行代码:

If new_index is greater than the length of the array, we want (I presume) to pad the array properly with new undefineds. This little snippet handles this by pushing undefined on the array until we have the proper length. Then, in arr.splice(old_index, 1)[0], we splice out the old element. splice returns the element that was spliced out, but it's in an array. In our above example, this was [1]. So we take the first index of that array to get the raw 1 there. Then we use splice to insert this element in the new_index's place. Since we padded the array above if new_index > arr.length, it will probably appear in the right place, unless they've done something strange like pass in a negative number.

解释负指数的一个更花哨的版本:

function array_move(arr, old_index, new_index) { while (old_index < 0) { old_index += arr.length; } while (new_index < 0) { new_index += arr.length; } if (new_index >= arr.length) { var k = new_index - arr.length + 1; while (k--) { arr.push(undefined); } } arr.splice(new_index, 0, arr.splice(old_index, 1)[0]); return arr; // for testing purposes }; // returns [1, 3, 2] console.log(array_move([1, 2, 3], -1, -2));

它应该正确地解释像array_move([1,2,3]， -1， -2)这样的事情(将最后一个元素移动到倒数第二个位置)。结果应该是[1,3,2]。

无论哪种方式，在你最初的问题中，对于c之后的a，你需要做array_move(arr, 0,2)对于b之前的d，你需要做array_move(arr, 3,1)。

我认为最好的方法是为数组定义一个新属性

Object.defineProperty(Array.prototype, 'move', {
    value: function (old_index, new_index) {
        while (old_index < 0) {
            old_index += this.length;
        }
        while (new_index < 0) {
            new_index += this.length;
        }
        if (new_index >= this.length) {
            let k = new_index - this.length;
            while ((k--) + 1) {
                this.push(undefined);
            }
        }
        this.splice(new_index, 0, this.splice(old_index, 1)[0]);
        return this;
    }
});

console.log([10, 20, 30, 40, 50].move(0, 1));  // [20, 10, 30, 40, 50]
console.log([10, 20, 30, 40, 50].move(0, 2));  // [20, 30, 10, 40, 50]

我喜欢不可变的，函数式的语句:)…

const swapIndex = (array, from, to) => (
  from < to 
    ? [...array.slice(0, from), ...array.slice(from + 1, to + 1), array[from], ...array.slice(to + 1)] 
    : [...array.slice(0, to), array[from], ...array.slice(to, from), ...array.slice(from + 1)]
);

var ELEMS = ['a', 'b', 'c', 'd', 'e']; /* Source item will remove and it will be placed just after destination */ function moveItemTo(sourceItem, destItem, elements) { var sourceIndex = elements.indexOf(sourceItem); var destIndex = elements.indexOf(destItem); if (sourceIndex >= -1 && destIndex > -1) { elements.splice(destIndex, 0, elements.splice(sourceIndex, 1)[0]); } return elements; } console.log('Init: ', ELEMS); var result = moveItemTo('a', 'c', ELEMS); console.log('BeforeAfter: ', result);