对于Linux和Mac OS X，如果使用gcc或任何使用glibc的编译器，可以使用execinfo.h中的backtrace()函数打印堆栈跟踪，并在出现分段错误时优雅地退出。文档可以在libc手册中找到。

下面是一个示例程序，它安装了一个SIGSEGV处理程序，并在发生段错误时将堆栈跟踪输出到stderr。这里的baz()函数会导致触发处理程序的段错误:

#include <stdio.h>
#include <execinfo.h>
#include <signal.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <unistd.h>


void handler(int sig) {
  void *array[10];
  size_t size;

  // get void*'s for all entries on the stack
  size = backtrace(array, 10);

  // print out all the frames to stderr
  fprintf(stderr, "Error: signal %d:\n", sig);
  backtrace_symbols_fd(array, size, STDERR_FILENO);
  exit(1);
}

void baz() {
 int *foo = (int*)-1; // make a bad pointer
  printf("%d\n", *foo);       // causes segfault
}

void bar() { baz(); }
void foo() { bar(); }


int main(int argc, char **argv) {
  signal(SIGSEGV, handler);   // install our handler
  foo(); // this will call foo, bar, and baz.  baz segfaults.
}

使用-g -rdynamic编译可以在输出中获得符号信息，glibc可以使用它来创建一个漂亮的stacktrace:

$ gcc -g -rdynamic ./test.c -o test

执行此命令将得到以下输出:

$ ./test
Error: signal 11:
./test(handler+0x19)[0x400911]
/lib64/tls/libc.so.6[0x3a9b92e380]
./test(baz+0x14)[0x400962]
./test(bar+0xe)[0x400983]
./test(foo+0xe)[0x400993]
./test(main+0x28)[0x4009bd]
/lib64/tls/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xdb)[0x3a9b91c4bb]
./test[0x40086a]

这显示了堆栈中每个帧的加载模块、偏移量和函数。在这里，您可以看到信号处理程序位于堆栈顶部，除了main、foo、bar和baz之外，还在main之前有libc函数。

看:

男人3回溯

And:

#include <exeinfo.h>
int backtrace(void **buffer, int size);

这些是GNU扩展。

城里的新国王来了 https://github.com/bombela/backward-cpp

在代码中放置1个头文件，安装1个库。

我个人使用这个函数来调用它

#include "backward.hpp"
void stacker() {

using namespace backward;
StackTrace st;


st.load_here(99); //Limit the number of trace depth to 99
st.skip_n_firsts(3);//This will skip some backward internal function from the trace

Printer p;
p.snippet = true;
p.object = true;
p.color = true;
p.address = true;
p.print(st, stderr);
}

You are probably not going to like this - all I can say in its favour is that it works for me, and I have similar but not identical requirements: I am writing a compiler/transpiler for a 1970's Algol-like language which uses C as it's output and then compiles the C so that as far as the user is concerned, they're generally not aware of C being involved, so although you might call it a transpiler, it's effectively a compiler that uses C as it's intermediate code. The language being compiled has a history of providing good diagnostics and a full backtrace in the original native compilers. I've been able to find gcc compiler flags and libraries etc that allow me to trap most of the runtime errors that the original compilers did (although with one glaring exception - unassigned variable trapping). When a runtime error occurs (eg arithmetic overflow, divide by zero, array index out of bounds, etc) the original compilers output a backtrace to the console listing all variables in the stack frames of every active procedure call. I struggled to get this effect in C, but eventually did so with what can only be described as a hack... When the program is invoked, the wrapper that supplies the C "main" looks at its argv, and if a special option is not present, it restarts itself under gdb with an altered argv containing both gdb options and the 'magic' option string for the program itself. This restarted version then hides those strings from the user's code by restoring the original arguments before calling the main block of the code written in our language. When an error occurs (as long as it is not one explicitly trapped within the program by user code), it exits to gdb which prints the required backtrace.

启动序列中的关键代码行包括:

  if ((argc >= 1) && (strcmp(origargv[argc-1], "--restarting-under-gdb")) != 0) {
    // initial invocation
    // the "--restarting-under-gdb" option is how the copy running under gdb knows
    // not to start another gdb process.

and

  char *gdb [] = {
    "/usr/bin/gdb", "-q", "-batch", "-nx", "-nh", "-return-child-result",
    "-ex", "run",
    "-ex", "bt full",
    "--args"
  };

The original arguments are appended to the gdb options above. That should be enough of a hint for you to do something similar for your own system. I did look at other library-supported backtrace options (eg libbacktrace, https://codingrelic.geekhold.com/2010/09/gcc-function-instrumentation.html, etc) but they only output the procedure call stack, not the local variables. However if anyone knows of any cleaner mechanism to get a similar effect, do please let us know. The main downside to this is that the variables are printed in C syntax, not the syntax of the language the user writes in. And (until I add suitable #line directives on every generated line of C :-() the backtrace lists the C source file and line numbers.

G PS我使用的gcc编译选项是:

 GCCOPTS=" -Wall -Wno-return-type -Wno-comment -g -fsanitize=undefined
 -fsanitize-undefined-trap-on-error -fno-sanitize-recover=all -frecord-gcc-switches
 -fsanitize=float-divide-by-zero -fsanitize=float-cast-overflow -ftrapv
 -grecord-gcc-switches -O0 -ggdb3 "

ulimit -c unlimited

是一个系统变量，它将允许在应用程序崩溃后创建一个核心转储。在这种情况下是无限的。在同一目录中查找一个名为core的文件。确保在编译代码时启用了调试信息!

问候

忘记改变你的源代码，用backtrace()函数或宏来做一些hack -这些只是糟糕的解决方案。

作为一个有效的解决方案，我的建议是:

用"-g"标志编译程序，用于将调试符号嵌入二进制(不用担心，这不会影响您的性能)。 在linux上运行下一个命令:"ulimit -c unlimited" -允许系统进行大崩溃转储。 当你的程序崩溃时，在工作目录中你会看到文件“core”。 gdb -batch -ex "backtrace" ./your_program_exe ./core . exe .执行下一个命令，将backtrace输出到标准输出

这将以人类可读的方式(包含源文件名和行号)打印程序的正确可读回溯。 此外，这种方法将给你自由自动化你的系统: 编写一个简短的脚本，检查进程是否创建了核心转储，然后通过电子邮件向开发人员发送回溯信息，或将其记录到一些日志系统中。