如何迭代由空格分隔的单词组成的字符串中的单词?

注意,我对C字符串函数或那种字符操作/访问不感兴趣。比起效率,我更喜欢优雅。我当前的解决方案:

#include <iostream>
#include <sstream>
#include <string>

using namespace std;

int main() {
    string s = "Somewhere down the road";
    istringstream iss(s);

    do {
        string subs;
        iss >> subs;
        cout << "Substring: " << subs << endl;
    } while (iss);
}

当前回答

我喜欢将boost/regex方法用于此任务,因为它们为指定拆分条件提供了最大的灵活性。

#include <iostream>
#include <string>
#include <boost/regex.hpp>

int main() {
    std::string line("A:::line::to:split");
    const boost::regex re(":+"); // one or more colons

    // -1 means find inverse matches aka split
    boost::sregex_token_iterator tokens(line.begin(),line.end(),re,-1);
    boost::sregex_token_iterator end;

    for (; tokens != end; ++tokens)
        std::cout << *tokens << std::endl;
}

其他回答

LazyString拆分器:

#include <string>
#include <algorithm>
#include <unordered_set>

using namespace std;

class LazyStringSplitter
{
    string::const_iterator start, finish;
    unordered_set<char> chop;

public:

    // Empty Constructor
    explicit LazyStringSplitter()
    {}

    explicit LazyStringSplitter (const string cstr, const string delims)
        : start(cstr.begin())
        , finish(cstr.end())
        , chop(delims.begin(), delims.end())
    {}

    void operator () (const string cstr, const string delims)
    {
        chop.insert(delims.begin(), delims.end());
        start = cstr.begin();
        finish = cstr.end();
    }

    bool empty() const { return (start >= finish); }

    string next()
    {
        // return empty string
        // if ran out of characters
        if (empty())
            return string("");

        auto runner = find_if(start, finish, [&](char c) {
            return chop.count(c) == 1;
        });

        // construct next string
        string ret(start, runner);
        start = runner + 1;

        // Never return empty string
        // + tail recursion makes this method efficient
        return !ret.empty() ? ret : next();
    }
};

我将此方法称为LazyStringSplitter是因为一个原因——它不会一次性拆分字符串。本质上,它的行为类似于python生成器它公开了一个名为next的方法,该方法返回从原始字符串拆分的下一个字符串我使用了c++11STL中的无序集,因此查找分隔符的速度要快得多下面是它的工作原理

测试程序

#include <iostream>
using namespace std;

int main()
{
    LazyStringSplitter splitter;

    // split at the characters ' ', '!', '.', ','
    splitter("This, is a string. And here is another string! Let's test and see how well this does.", " !.,");

    while (!splitter.empty())
        cout << splitter.next() << endl;
    return 0;
}

输出,输出

This
is
a
string
And
here
is
another
string
Let's
test
and
see
how
well
this
does

改进这一点的下一个计划是实施开始和结束方法,以便可以执行以下操作:

vector<string> split_string(splitter.begin(), splitter.end());

使用vector作为基类的快速版本,可完全访问其所有运算符:

    // Split string into parts.
    class Split : public std::vector<std::string>
    {
        public:
            Split(const std::string& str, char* delimList)
            {
               size_t lastPos = 0;
               size_t pos = str.find_first_of(delimList);

               while (pos != std::string::npos)
               {
                    if (pos != lastPos)
                        push_back(str.substr(lastPos, pos-lastPos));
                    lastPos = pos + 1;
                    pos = str.find_first_of(delimList, lastPos);
               }
               if (lastPos < str.length())
                   push_back(str.substr(lastPos, pos-lastPos));
            }
    };

用于填充STL集的示例:

std::set<std::string> words;
Split split("Hello,World", ",");
words.insert(split.begin(), split.end());

这是我的条目:

template <typename Container, typename InputIter, typename ForwardIter>
Container
split(InputIter first, InputIter last,
      ForwardIter s_first, ForwardIter s_last)
{
    Container output;

    while (true) {
        auto pos = std::find_first_of(first, last, s_first, s_last);
        output.emplace_back(first, pos);
        if (pos == last) {
            break;
        }

        first = ++pos;
    }

    return output;
}

template <typename Output = std::vector<std::string>,
          typename Input = std::string,
          typename Delims = std::string>
Output
split(const Input& input, const Delims& delims = " ")
{
    using std::cbegin;
    using std::cend;
    return split<Output>(cbegin(input), cend(input),
                         cbegin(delims), cend(delims));
}

auto vec = split("Mary had a little lamb");

第一个定义是采用两对迭代器的STL样式泛型函数。第二个是一个方便的函数,可以让你不用自己做所有的开始和结束。例如,如果要使用列表,还可以将输出容器类型指定为模板参数。

它之所以优雅(IMO),是因为与其他大多数答案不同,它不限于字符串,而是可以与任何STL兼容的容器一起使用。在不更改上述代码的情况下,您可以说:

using vec_of_vecs_t = std::vector<std::vector<int>>;

std::vector<int> v{1, 2, 0, 3, 4, 5, 0, 7, 8, 0, 9};
auto r = split<vec_of_vecs_t>(v, std::initializer_list<int>{0, 2});

这将在每次遇到0或2时将向量v分割成单独的向量。

(还有一个额外的好处,即使用字符串,这个实现比基于strtok()和getline()的版本更快,至少在我的系统上是这样。)

有一种更简单的方法可以做到这一点!!

#include <vector>
#include <string>
std::vector<std::string> splitby(std::string string, char splitter) {
    int splits = 0;
    std::vector<std::string> result = {};
    std::string locresult = "";
    for (unsigned int i = 0; i < string.size(); i++) {
        if ((char)string.at(i) != splitter) {
            locresult += string.at(i);
        }
        else {
            result.push_back(locresult);
            locresult = "";
        }
    }
    if (splits == 0) {
        result.push_back(locresult);
    }
    return result;
}

void printvector(std::vector<std::string> v) {
    std::cout << '{';
    for (unsigned int i = 0; i < v.size(); i++) {
        if (i < v.size() - 1) {
            std::cout << '"' << v.at(i) << "\",";
        }
        else {
            std::cout << '"' << v.at(i) << "\"";
        }
    }
    std::cout << "}\n";
}

我喜欢将boost/regex方法用于此任务,因为它们为指定拆分条件提供了最大的灵活性。

#include <iostream>
#include <string>
#include <boost/regex.hpp>

int main() {
    std::string line("A:::line::to:split");
    const boost::regex re(":+"); // one or more colons

    // -1 means find inverse matches aka split
    boost::sregex_token_iterator tokens(line.begin(),line.end(),re,-1);
    boost::sregex_token_iterator end;

    for (; tokens != end; ++tokens)
        std::cout << *tokens << std::endl;
}