现在我在框架中有一个中心模块,它使用Python 2.6 multiprocessing模块生成多个进程。因为它使用多处理,所以有一个模块级的多处理感知日志,log = multiprocessing.get_logger()。根据文档,这个日志记录器(EDIT)没有进程共享锁,所以你不会在sys. exe中弄乱东西。Stderr(或任何文件句柄),让多个进程同时写入它。

我现在遇到的问题是框架中的其他模块不支持多处理。在我看来,我需要让这个中心模块上的所有依赖都使用多处理感知日志。这在框架内很烦人,更不用说对框架的所有客户端了。还有我想不到的选择吗?


当前回答

到2020年,似乎有一种更简单的多处理日志记录方式。

这个函数将创建记录器。你可以在这里设置格式和你想要输出的位置(文件,stdout):

def create_logger():
    import multiprocessing, logging
    logger = multiprocessing.get_logger()
    logger.setLevel(logging.INFO)
    formatter = logging.Formatter(\
        '[%(asctime)s| %(levelname)s| %(processName)s] %(message)s')
    handler = logging.FileHandler('logs/your_file_name.log')
    handler.setFormatter(formatter)

    # this bit will make sure you won't have 
    # duplicated messages in the output
    if not len(logger.handlers): 
        logger.addHandler(handler)
    return logger

在init中实例化记录器:

if __name__ == '__main__': 
    from multiprocessing import Pool
    logger = create_logger()
    logger.info('Starting pooling')
    p = Pool()
    # rest of the code

现在,你只需要在每个需要记录日志的函数中添加这个引用:

logger = create_logger()

并输出消息:

logger.info(f'My message from {something}')

希望这能有所帮助。

其他回答

我喜欢zzzeek的回答。我只会用管道代替队列,因为如果多个线程/进程使用相同的管道端来生成日志消息,它们将被混淆。

QueueHandler在Python 3.2+中是原生的,并且正是这样做的。它很容易在以前的版本中复制。

Python文档有两个完整的示例:从多个进程记录到单个文件

对于那些使用Python < 3.2的人,只需将QueueHandler从https://gist.github.com/vsajip/591589复制到自己的代码中,或者导入logutils。

每个进程(包括父进程)将其日志记录放在Queue上,然后监听线程或进程(为每个进程提供了一个示例)拾取这些日志并将它们全部写入一个文件—没有损坏或乱码的风险。

对于可能需要这个的人,我为multiprocessing_logging包写了一个装饰器,它将当前进程名添加到日志中,这样就可以清楚地看到谁记录了什么。

它还运行install_mp_handler(),因此在创建池之前运行它是没有用的。

这让我可以看到哪个工作人员创建了哪些日志消息。

下面是蓝图和示例:

import sys
import logging
from functools import wraps
import multiprocessing
import multiprocessing_logging

# Setup basic console logger as 'logger'
logger = logging.getLogger()
console_handler = logging.StreamHandler(sys.stdout)
console_handler.setFormatter(logging.Formatter(u'%(asctime)s :: %(levelname)s :: %(message)s'))
logger.setLevel(logging.DEBUG)
logger.addHandler(console_handler)


# Create a decorator for functions that are called via multiprocessing pools
def logs_mp_process_names(fn):
    class MultiProcessLogFilter(logging.Filter):
        def filter(self, record):
            try:
                process_name = multiprocessing.current_process().name
            except BaseException:
                process_name = __name__
            record.msg = f'{process_name} :: {record.msg}'
            return True

    multiprocessing_logging.install_mp_handler()
    f = MultiProcessLogFilter()

    # Wraps is needed here so apply / apply_async know the function name
    @wraps(fn)
    def wrapper(*args, **kwargs):
        logger.removeFilter(f)
        logger.addFilter(f)
        return fn(*args, **kwargs)

    return wrapper


# Create a test function and decorate it
@logs_mp_process_names
def test(argument):
    logger.info(f'test function called via: {argument}')


# You can also redefine undecored functions
def undecorated_function():
    logger.info('I am not decorated')


@logs_mp_process_names
def redecorated(*args, **kwargs):
    return undecorated_function(*args, **kwargs)


# Enjoy
if __name__ == '__main__':
    with multiprocessing.Pool() as mp_pool:
        # Also works with apply_async
        mp_pool.apply(test, ('mp pool',))
        mp_pool.apply(redecorated)
        logger.info('some main logs')
        test('main program')

下面是我简单的破解/变通方法…不是最全面的,但很容易修改,比我在写这篇文章之前找到的任何其他答案都更容易阅读和理解:

import logging
import multiprocessing

class FakeLogger(object):
    def __init__(self, q):
        self.q = q
    def info(self, item):
        self.q.put('INFO - {}'.format(item))
    def debug(self, item):
        self.q.put('DEBUG - {}'.format(item))
    def critical(self, item):
        self.q.put('CRITICAL - {}'.format(item))
    def warning(self, item):
        self.q.put('WARNING - {}'.format(item))

def some_other_func_that_gets_logger_and_logs(num):
    # notice the name get's discarded
    # of course you can easily add this to your FakeLogger class
    local_logger = logging.getLogger('local')
    local_logger.info('Hey I am logging this: {} and working on it to make this {}!'.format(num, num*2))
    local_logger.debug('hmm, something may need debugging here')
    return num*2

def func_to_parallelize(data_chunk):
    # unpack our args
    the_num, logger_q = data_chunk
    # since we're now in a new process, let's monkeypatch the logging module
    logging.getLogger = lambda name=None: FakeLogger(logger_q)
    # now do the actual work that happens to log stuff too
    new_num = some_other_func_that_gets_logger_and_logs(the_num)
    return (the_num, new_num)

if __name__ == '__main__':
    multiprocessing.freeze_support()
    m = multiprocessing.Manager()
    logger_q = m.Queue()
    # we have to pass our data to be parallel-processed
    # we also need to pass the Queue object so we can retrieve the logs
    parallelable_data = [(1, logger_q), (2, logger_q)]
    # set up a pool of processes so we can take advantage of multiple CPU cores
    pool_size = multiprocessing.cpu_count() * 2
    pool = multiprocessing.Pool(processes=pool_size, maxtasksperchild=4)
    worker_output = pool.map(func_to_parallelize, parallelable_data)
    pool.close() # no more tasks
    pool.join()  # wrap up current tasks
    # get the contents of our FakeLogger object
    while not logger_q.empty():
        print logger_q.get()
    print 'worker output contained: {}'.format(worker_output)

我建议使用logger_tt库:https://github.com/Dragon2fly/logger_tt

multiporcessing_logging库不能在我的macOSX上工作,而logger_tt可以。